Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Unit-6 Suppliers, Competitors and Business Ethics
Unit-6 Suppliers, Competitors and Business Ethics
Unit-6 Suppliers, Competitors and Business Ethics
Unit-6
Overview
• Show how other businesses – suppliers and competitors –
exist in mutual interdependence with a given organization
• Describe the ethical issues and problems that arise in an
organisation’s dealings with its suppliers and competitors
• Outline how globalization reframes these problems
• Discuss whether corporations should assume some degree
of extended responsibility for the ethics of their suppliers
• Assess the arguments suggesting that attention to
business interrelationships and the network economy may
contribute to more sustainable business models
Suppliers and competitors as stakeholders
Suppliers as stakeholders
• A stakeholder of a corporation is an individual or a group that
either is harmed by or benefits from the corporation or whose
rights can be violated, or have to be respected, by the
corporation (Evan and Freeman 1993)
• Organisations and their suppliers can be seen as mutually
dependent
Competitors as stakeholders
• Forgotten stakeholders? (Spence et al. 2001)
– Legal rights (e.g. not influencing other’s pricing)
– Moral claims (e.g. right to fair play)
• So, businesses should not be seen as isolated islands of
economic activity, but as actors operating within a web of
other businesses, bound by mutual interests and interlinked
flows of resources and rewards
– Firms thus best understood as part of industrial network
Supplier relationship as part of an industrial network
Potential
Supplier’s supplier
supplier Competitor
Supplier
Corporation
Supplier’s
supplier
Supplier
Competitor
Supplier’s
supplier Potential
supplier
Ethical issues and suppliers
Ethical issues (I)
• Misuse of power
– Resource dependence theory can help understand relative power of
buyer and seller
• The question of loyalty
– Doesn’t fit easily with economic view of firm, but can create
mutually-beneficial outcomes
• Preferential treatment
– Big challenge: procedural justice approach can help
• Conflicts of interest
– A conflict of interest occurs when a person or organization’s
obligation to act in the interests of another is interfered with by a
competing interest that may obstruct the fulfilment of that
obligation
Ethical issues (II)
Gifts, bribes and hospitality
• Consider the intention of the gift giver
• Look at the impact on the receiver
• Focus on the perception of other parties
• Many large organizations have a formal purchasing code of
ethics
• Guidelines provided by professional bodies such as the
International Chartered Institute of Purchasing and Supply
Ethics of negotiation (I)
• Ethics and negotiation – oil and water?
• Here are ten popular negotiating actions, all of which can
be challenged on ethical grounds (Reitz et al.,1998):
– Lies
– Puffery
– Deception
– Weakening the opponent
– Strengthening one’s own position
– Non-disclosure
– Information exploitation
– Change of mind
– Distraction
– Maximisation
Ethics of negotiation (II)
A more ethical approach to negotiating should
steer clear of these tactics. This is because:
• It is the right thing to do
• Such practices incur costs for the negotiator. These are:
– Rigid negotiating – encourages narrow tactics
– Damaged relationships – risk of enmity
– Sullied reputation – making future bargaining troublesome
– Lost opportunities – tends to prevent progressive discussions that
open up new issues
• Basic idea: negotiation is not so much zero-sum as a chance
to build mutually-beneficial relationships
Ethical issues and competitors
Problems of overly aggressive
competition
• Intelligence gathering and industrial espionage create
ethical questions when
– Questionable tactics
– Private or confidential information
– Purpose for which information gathered is against public interest
• ‘Dirty tricks’
– Negative advertising
– Stealing customers
– Predatory pricing
– Sabotage
• Anti-competitive behaviour
Problems of insufficient
competition
• Collusion and cartels
– Select groups of competitors band together in a
cartel or trading group to fix prices and other
trading arrangements for their own mutual benefit
• Abuse of dominant position
– E.g. Microsoft
Globalization, suppliers, and
competitors
The ethical challenges of global
business networks
The ethical challenges of global
business networks
• Reshaping of ethical consideration with
suppliers and competitors brings up:
– Different ways of doing business
– Impacts on indigenous businesses
– Differing labour and environmental standards
– Extended chain of responsibility
Different ways of doing business (I)
Rank Country Score
1 Belgium 8.8 Bribe paying for multinational
1 Canada 8.8 companies according to country of
3 Netherlands 8.7 origin
5 Germany 8.6
Note: Scores based on 0 to 10, where
5 United Kingdom 8.6
a perfect score, indicating no
5 Japan 8.6
8 Australia 8.5
perceived propensity to pay bribes, is
9 Singapore 8.1
10. Thus, companies headquartered
9 USA 8.1
in those countries with a lower score
12 Spain 7.9 have a higher perceived propensity to
14 South Africa 6.5 bribe
14 South Korea 6.5
Source: figures extracted from 2008
17 Italy 7.4
Bribe Payers Index at
17 Brazil 7.4
www.transparency.org
19 India 6.8
20 Mexico 6.6
21 China 6.5
22 Russia 5.9
Different ways of doing business
(II)
Business Sector Score Top ten sectors for bribe paying
Public works/construction 5.2
Note: The scores range from 0 to 10,
Real estate/property development 5.7
where 0 represents the view that
Oil and gas 5.9
‘bribes are almost always paid’ and
Heavy manufacturing 6.0
10 that ‘bribes are never paid’ by a
Mining 6.0
sector.
Pharmaceuticals/medical care 6.2
Utilities 6.3
Source: figures extracted from 2008
Civilian aerospace 6.4
Bribe Payers Index at
www.transparency.org
Power generation and transmission 6.4
Forestry 6.5
Impacts on indigenous
businesses
• Size, power and political influence of MNCs often means that
they enjoy considerable cost and other advantages compared
to local competitors
• Offer employment alternatives to people who would
otherwise start their own business (Spencer, 2008: 341)
• Exposure to the competition of a major multinational can
severely threaten the business of indigenous competitors (Klein,
2000)
Differing labour and
environmental standards
• Western firms increasingly sourced through global supply
chains
• ‘Race to the bottom’ occasioned by demand by MNCs for
lower-cost production in developing countries
• Ethical problem = lower costs often accompanied by
‘sweatshop’ conditions
– poorer labour conditions
– less environmental protection
– lower attention to health and safety
Extended chain of responsibility
Shifts towards global supply and competition
mean that individual firms appear to be faced
with prospect of an extended chain of
responsibility
• No longer acceptable to argue that the ethics of a firms
suppliers or a firms impact on its competitors was simply not
any of its business (see Emmelhainz and Adams 1999)
The corporate citizen in the
business community
Ethical sourcing and fair trade
Ethical sourcing
• Ethical sourcing is the inclusion of explicit social, ethical,
and/or environmental criteria into supply chain
management policies, procedures and programmes
• Suppliers’ willingness to comply or resist pressure to certify
(e.g. ISO 14001) is strongly determined by the type of
relationship they have to the companies that purchase from
them (Delmas and Montiel 2009)
– Suppliers with a high dependence on their customers are more likely
to comply
– as are relatively new entrants to the industry
– For suppliers, the public act of gaining ethical certification can act as
a way of reducing information asymmetries between themselves and
potential buyers
Business-business regulation
• Ethical sourcing as business-business regulation
– Pressure exerted by powerful corporate customers to comply with
ethical sourcing guidelines and criteria constitutes strong and often
very effective regulation of supply chain members (Locke and Romis,
2007)
Strategies of business-business regulation
• Disengagement
– Setting of clear standards for suppliers and a means for assessing
compliance with those standards
– Failure to meet standards in short- medium term will result in
disengagement by the company
• Engagement
– Rely on longer-term ‘aims’ together with incremental ‘targets’ in
order to foster a step-by-step approach to improving standards.
– Firm likely to work with their suppliers to achieve improvements
Fair trade
• Fair trade is a system aimed at offering ‘the most
disadvantaged producers in developing countries the
opportunity to move out of poverty through creating market
access under beneficial rather than exploitative terms. The
objective is to empower producers to develop their own
business and wider communities through international
trade’ (Nicholls & Opal 2005: 6)
• Aims of fair trade movement
– Foster the protection and empowerment of growers
– Encourage community development by guaranteeing minimum
prices and conditions
• In 2008, Fair Trade sales grew 22% (est. €2.9Bn)
– But success could put pressure on ethical standards
– Challenges also from recruiting employees with mainstream business
skills (Davies & Crane, 2010)
Comparison: Fairtrade & New
York Prices for Cocoa, 1994-2009