1) Injuria sine damnum refers to the infringement of a legal right without damage.
2) If a legal right is violated, the plaintiff can bring an action whether they suffered an actual loss or not.
3) Ashby v. White established that infringing on a private right is actionable even without pecuniary damage, as Ashby's right to vote was violated despite his preferred candidate winning.
1) Injuria sine damnum refers to the infringement of a legal right without damage.
2) If a legal right is violated, the plaintiff can bring an action whether they suffered an actual loss or not.
3) Ashby v. White established that infringing on a private right is actionable even without pecuniary damage, as Ashby's right to vote was violated despite his preferred candidate winning.
1) Injuria sine damnum refers to the infringement of a legal right without damage.
2) If a legal right is violated, the plaintiff can bring an action whether they suffered an actual loss or not.
3) Ashby v. White established that infringing on a private right is actionable even without pecuniary damage, as Ashby's right to vote was violated despite his preferred candidate winning.
1) Injuria sine damnum refers to the infringement of a legal right without damage.
2) If a legal right is violated, the plaintiff can bring an action whether they suffered an actual loss or not.
3) Ashby v. White established that infringing on a private right is actionable even without pecuniary damage, as Ashby's right to vote was violated despite his preferred candidate winning.
• 'Injuria' refers to infringement of a legal right and
the term 'damnum' means substantial harm, loss or damage. • If there has been violation of a legal right, the same is actionable whether the plaintiff has suffered any loss or not. • This maxim provides : (1) infringement of a legal right of a person. (2) no actual loss or damage is required to prove. (3) infringement of a private right is actionable per se. Ashby v. White, (1703) 92 ER 126. FACTS: • Plaintiff was a qualified voter at a Parliamentary election, but defendant, a returning officer, wrongfully refused to take plaintiff’s vote. No loss was suffered by such refusal because the candidate for whom he wanted to vote won the election. HELD: • Plaintiff succeeded in his action. REASONING: • Injuria sine damnum explained. Ashby v. White, (1703) 92 ER 126.
• Injury : Deprivation of legal right to vote
• Damage: none Since the candidate to whom the plaintiff wanted to vote still won the election
• Thus, injuria sine damnum.
Ashby v. White, (1703) 92 ER 126. • It was held that the defendant (White) by preventing the Plaintiff (Ashby) from voting, violated Ashby’s legal right. Thus, Ashby was entitled to damages.
• Chief Justice Holt said:
• “Every injury imports a damage though it does not cost the party one farthing. For a damage not merely pecuniary but an injury imports damage, when a person is thereby hindered of his rights.”