The document discusses Richard Dedekind's 1879 text on "substitutions" where he defines a process that transforms elements of one "domain" into another domain. Dedekind goes on to define an "equivalence" between these domains when the transformation preserves the original domain's size and structure. It also mentions that Dedekind began lecturing on group theory in 1856 and would spend decades abstracting algebra and developing set theory as a framework for his research.
The document discusses Richard Dedekind's 1879 text on "substitutions" where he defines a process that transforms elements of one "domain" into another domain. Dedekind goes on to define an "equivalence" between these domains when the transformation preserves the original domain's size and structure. It also mentions that Dedekind began lecturing on group theory in 1856 and would spend decades abstracting algebra and developing set theory as a framework for his research.
The document discusses Richard Dedekind's 1879 text on "substitutions" where he defines a process that transforms elements of one "domain" into another domain. Dedekind goes on to define an "equivalence" between these domains when the transformation preserves the original domain's size and structure. It also mentions that Dedekind began lecturing on group theory in 1856 and would spend decades abstracting algebra and developing set theory as a framework for his research.
"substitutions." Dedekind publishes a book on the subject of substitutions, by which he means a proccess which transforms "elements a, b, c, ..." of one "domain" into elements "a', b', c', ..." of another "domain." Dedekind goes on on Cantor – Cardinality the define an "equivalence" of these Cantor -- R is domains that is realized when the Cantor and Dedekind (1874). Richard Dedekind George Cantor (1872).Georg Cantor and uncountable (1873). Cantor defines cardinality as the size of a given set. Cantor transformation preserves the original domain's size and structure. In 1856, He began a series of Cantor first establishes that In contrast to much of Richard Dedekind meet for the further declares the lectures on Group Theory -- the set of Real Numbers is not Dedekind's work involving first time and initiate an on- cardinality of N is aleph- using the word "domain" to refer countable. Later, algebraic discrete sets, Cantor again off-again correspondence. naught and that the to sets and groups. Dedekind will numbers are countable and begins lecturing and They would collaborate several cardinality of all infinite sets spend the next several decades transcendental numbers are researching on continuous times over the following decades is not equal. (The cardinality abstracting algebra, and will not countable. sets. of all countably infinite sets is develop a "set theory" as a also aleph-null.) framework for his research. Aleph-numbers
John Venn -- Venn
Cantor -- Proof that R is Diagrams(1880). Cantor - Cantor's Paradox (1899). uncountable (1891). Venn Diagrams A visualization of the contents Georg Cantor discovers Cantor's paradox, a first indication of the inadequacy of the Giuseppe Peano – Cantor publishes his famous, elegant proof concerning the non-countability of of sets -- along with their intersecteing and disjointed subsets. The name Venn Diagram would come about later; Venn referred to his axioms of naive set theory. Notation(1895) R. creation as Eulerian Circles, as it was based on Euler Diagrams developed 100 years earlier. Proper Venn Diagrams differ from Euler Peano's text "Formulario Mathematico" established much of the standard Diagrams in that all possible intersections are set theoretical notation common today. Notation included: shown. In Euler Diagrams, disjoint sets are - intersection and union, depicted as such. - inclusion, - element of, and - differences. Zermelo in 1908 was the first to attempt an axiomatisation of set theory. Many other mathematicians attempted to axiomatise set theory. Fraenkel, von Neumann, Bernays Russell's and Gödel are all important figures in this development. Gödel showed the
Paradox(1901). limitations of any axiomatic theory
and the aims of many Burtrand Russell discovers a paradox mathematicians such as Frege and inherent in Naive Set Theory, "the set Hilbert could never be achieved.“ of all sets that do not contain
HISTORY OF SET THEORY
themselves" establishing a need for an axiomatic set theory.