Testing For Normality

You might also like

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 12

Testing for Normality


Most statistical procedures require us to verify at least two assumptions :
the normality assumption
the assumption of absence of outliers

There are two categories of methods used to check the normality assumption:
Numerical methods
Graphical methods

Numerical methods:
Skewness and kurtosis indicators
The Shapiro-Wilk normality test
 
Graphical methods:
The histogram
The Q-Q plot

 

The variable is normally distributed with a 99% confidence level if both standard scores lie in this
interval: (-2.58, 2.58).

The hypotheses of the Shapiro-Wilk test:

H0: the variable is normally distributed


H1: the variable is not normally distributed

We accept the null hypothesis if we have Sig.>0,05


The Q-Q plot for a positively skewed
distribution
The Q-Q plot for a negatively skewed
distribution
The Q-Q plot for a leptokurtic distribution
The Q-Q plot for a platikurtic distribution
What to do if the normality
assumption is violated?
1. The first solution consists of applying a transformation to the variable so that, hopefully,
the new variable is normally distributed.

2. The second solution consists of running a nonparametric test if our variables are not
normal. (for example, the Spearman correlation or the Mann-Whitney test).

3. The third solution : run the analysis regardless. Many parametric tests are pretty robust to
deviations from normality, especially when the samples are large

4. The fourth solution consists of performing a so called “sensitivity analysis”. In other words,
you would run two tests: a parametric test and a nonparametric one. If both tests lead to
the same conclusion, the normality violations are not an issue. If the conclusions are
totally different, the deviations from normality seem to be a problem.

You might also like