ACTIVITY- BASED COSTING

John Wiley & Sons, Inc. © 2005

ACTIVITY-BASED COSTING VERSUS
TRADITIONAL COSTING
Study Objective 1

Traditional Costing Systems

 Allocates overhead using a single predetermined
rate.
Job order costing: direct labor cost is assumed
to be the relevant activity base.
Process costing: machine hours is the relevant
activity base.

 Assumption was satisfactory when direct labor

was a major portion of total manufacturing costs.
Wide acceptance of a high correlation between
direct labor and overhead costs.
 Traditional Costing Systems:
Continued

 Direct labor is still often the appropriate basis

for assigning overhead costs when:
Direct labor constitutes a significant part of
total product cost
and
High correlation exists between direct labor and
changes in overhead costs.

Overhead Direct Labor Products

Costs Hours/Dollars
 Need for a New Approach
 Tremendous change in manufacturing and service
industries.

 Decrease in amount of direct labor usage.

 Significant increase in total overhead costs.

 May be inappropriate to use plant-wide

predetermined overhead rates based on direct labor
or machine hours when a lack of correlation exists.

 Complex manufacturing processes may require

multiple allocation bases; this approach is called
Activity-Based Costing (ABC).
 Activity-Based Costing (ABC)

 An overhead cost allocation system that allocates

overhead to multiple activity cost pools
and
 Assigns the activity cost pools to products or
services by means of cost drivers that represent the
activities used.
 Activity-Based Costing (ABC)
Terms
 Activity: any event, action, transaction, or work
sequence that causes a cost to be incurred in
producing a product or providing a service.

 Activity Cost Pool: a distinct type of activity.

For example: ordering materials or setting up
machines.

 Cost Drivers: any factors or activities that have a

direct cause-effect relationship with the
resources consumed.
 The Logic Behind ABC

Products consume activities,

and
activities consume resources.
 Activity-Based Costing (ABC) – Continued

 ABC allocates overhead costs in two stages:

Stage 1: Overhead costs are allocated to activity

cost pools.

Stage 2: The overhead costs allocated to the cost

pools is assigned to products using cost
drivers.

 The more complex a product’s manufacturing

operation, the more activities and cost drivers likely
to be present.
Activities and Related Cost Drivers
ABC System Design – Lift Jack Company
 Traditional Costing vs ABC

 ABC does not replace an existing job

order/process cost system.

 ABC does segregate overhead into various

cost pools to provide more accurate cost
information.

 ABC, thus, supplements – it does not replace

– the traditional cost system.
 Traditional Costing vs ABC
An Illustration
Study Objectives 2, 3, & 4

 Atlas Company produces two automotive antitheft devices:

 The Boot: a high volume item with sales totaling 25,000 per year
 The Club: a low volume item with sales totaling 5,000 per year

 Each product requires 1 hour of direct labor

 Total annual direct labor hours (DLH) 30,000 (25,000 + 5000)
 Direct labor cost $12 per unit for each product

 Expected annual manufacturing overhead costs $900,000

 Direct materials cost:

 The Boot - $40 per unit
 The Club - $30 per unit
 Activity-Based Costing:
A Closer Look
Study Objective 5

More accurate product costing through:

 Use of more cost pools to assign overhead costs
 Enhanced control over overhead costs
 Better management decisions
Activity-Based Costing: A Closer Look
Limitations of ABC

 Can be expensive to use

 Some arbitrary allocations continue
 Activity-Based Costing:
A Closer Look

Use ABC When One or More of the Following Exist:

 Products differ greatly in volume/manufacturing complexity
 Products lines are
 Numerous
 Diverse
 Require different degrees of support services
 Overhead costs are a significant portion of total costs
 Significant change in manufacturing process or number of
products
 Value-Added vs.
Non-Value-Added Activities
Value-Added Activity
An activity that increases the worth
of a product or service such as:

Manufacturing Company Service Company

engineering design performing surgery
machining legal research services
assembly delivering packages
painting
packaging
 Value-Added vs.
Non-Value-Added Activities
Non-Value-Added Activities
An activity that adds cost to, or increases the time
spent on, a product/service without increasing its
market value such as:
Manufacturing Company Service Company
Repair of machines Taking appointments
Storage of inventory Reception
Moving of raw materials, Bookkeeping/billing
assemblies, and finished goods Traveling
Building maintenance Ordering supplies
Inspections
Inventory Control
 Hierarchy of Activity Levels
Four Levels Types of Activities
Unit-Level Activities Machine-related:
Drilling, cutting, milling
Labor-related
Assembling, painting
Batch-Level Activities Equipment setups
Purchase ordering
Inspection
Material handling
Product-Level Activities Product design
Engineering changes
Facility-Level Activities Plant management
salaries
Plant depreciation
Property taxes
Utilities
Cost Drivers
Machine Hours
Direct labor hours/cost
Number of setups/setup time
Number of purchase orders
Number of inspections or
inspection time
Number of material moves
Number of product designs
Number of changes
Number of employees
managed
Square footage
Square footage
Square footage
 Just-In-Time Processing (JIT)

A processing system dedicated to having the

right amount of materials, products, or parts
arrive as they are needed, thereby reducing
the amount of inventory.
Just-In-Time Processing

100 pairs of Send rubber and

sneakers... shoe laces directly
got it! to the factory.

Sales Order
Received
s
Susan’r
Socce ers
Sneak

Cu st o mer
o
Goods Manufactured hipped t
G oo d s S
 JIT Processing
Objective of JIT:
Eliminate all manufacturing inventories

Elements of JIT:
 Dependable suppliers
 Multi-skilled work force
 Total quality control system

Benefits of JIT:
 Reduced inventory
 Enhanced product quality
 Reduced rework and storage costs
 Savings from improved flow of goods
 COPYRIGHT

Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction or
translation of this work beyond that permitted in Section 117 of the 1976 United
States Copyright Act without the express written consent of the copyright owner is
unlawful. Request for further information should be addressed to the Permissions
Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. The purchaser may make back-up copies for
his/her own use only and not for distribution or resale. The Publisher assumes no
responsibility for errors, omissions, or damages, caused by the use of these
programs or from the use of the information contained herein.