The document discusses different types of defective contracts under Philippine law:
1) Rescissible contracts are valid until rescinded due to economic prejudice or lesion to one party.
2) Voidable contracts are valid until annulled due to incapacity or vitiated consent of one party.
3) Unenforceable contracts cannot be enforced in court without being ratified first, usually due to lack of required formalities.
4) Void contracts are invalid from the beginning due to failure to meet essential requirements or being unlawful.
The document discusses different types of defective contracts under Philippine law:
1) Rescissible contracts are valid until rescinded due to economic prejudice or lesion to one party.
2) Voidable contracts are valid until annulled due to incapacity or vitiated consent of one party.
3) Unenforceable contracts cannot be enforced in court without being ratified first, usually due to lack of required formalities.
4) Void contracts are invalid from the beginning due to failure to meet essential requirements or being unlawful.
The document discusses different types of defective contracts under Philippine law:
1) Rescissible contracts are valid until rescinded due to economic prejudice or lesion to one party.
2) Voidable contracts are valid until annulled due to incapacity or vitiated consent of one party.
3) Unenforceable contracts cannot be enforced in court without being ratified first, usually due to lack of required formalities.
4) Void contracts are invalid from the beginning due to failure to meet essential requirements or being unlawful.
2. Voidable (Article 1390 – 1402) 3. Unenforceable (1403 – 1408) 4. Void (Article 1409 -1422) Recission – a process to render inefficacious a contract validly entered into and normally binding, by reason of external conditions, causing economic prejudice and to a party.
Requisites of Rescission
1. There exists a valid contract;
2. There is lesion or economic/financial prejudice. Rescissible Contracts 1. Those entered into by guardians whenever the wards whom they represent suffer lesion by more than one-fourth of the value of the things which are the object thereof; 2. Those agreed upon in misrepresentation of the absentees, when the latter suffer lesion by more than one fourth; 3. Those undertaken in fraud of the creditors; 4. Those things which are under litigation; 5. All contracts specially declared by law to be rescissible. Voidable Contracts – valid until annulled.
1. One of the parties is incapable of giving consent;
2. One where the consent is vitiated by mistake, violence, intimidation, undue influence or fraud. Annulment v. Rescission Basis of action is incapacity to give Basis is lesion or damage consent; damage is not important; Defect is intrinsic Defect is extrinsic Annulment is a principal action; Rescission is subsidiary Public interest governs Rescisison is a remedy Private interest Unenforceable Contracts
1. Those entered into in the name of another person by one
who has not authority or legal representation, who has acted beyond his powers; 2. Those that do not comply with the statute of fraud; 3. Those where both parties are incapable of giving consent; Statute of Fraud – a law that requires certain acts and contracts to be in writing to be valid.
Unenforceable contract cannot be sued upon or
enforced unless ratified. As if they have not effect at all. The following contracts should always in writing: 1. An agreement that by its term is not to be enforced within the year; 2. A special promise to answer for the debt, default, or miscarriage of another; 3. An agreement made in consideration of marriage, other than mutual promise to marry; 4. An agreement for the sale of goods, chattels, or things in action the amount of which exceeds Php500.00 5. Lease agreement for more than a year; 6. A representation as to the credit of a third person; Void contracts – have no force and effect for failure to meet the essential requisites of contracts or because of being unlawful illegal. The following contracts are inexistent and void from the beginning:
1. Those whose cause, object or purpose is contrary to law, morals,
good customs, public order or public policy; 2. Absolutely simulated or fictitious contract; 3. Those whose cause or object did not exist at the time of the transaction; 4. Those whose object is outside the commerce of men; 5. Those which contemplate an impossible service; 6. Those where the intention of the parties relative to the principal contract cannot be ascertained. Void distinguish from Unenforceable Contract
Void Unenforceable Contract
Cannot be ratified; May be ratified; No contract at all; There is a contract but it cannot Can be directly assailed by be enforced by a court action; anybody; Cannot be assailed by third parties. Characteristics of a Void Contract 1. The defense of illegality cannot be waived; 2. The action or defense for their declaration as inexistent does not prescribed; 3. Defense of illegality is not available to third persons whose interest are not directly affected; 4. It cannot give rise to a contract; 5. Generally, produces no effect; 6. No action to declare it void is needed; 7. Cannot be ratified Void distinguished from Rescissible Contract Void Rescisssible Produces no effect; Valid unless rescinded; Defect is incapacity of the parties or Defect consists in damage or lesion lack of essential elements; to one of the parties; Action to declare illegality does not Action prescribes; prescribe; Rescissible character may be Cannot be assailed by a third person. assailed by third person. Void Distinguish from Voidable Contract
Void Voidable Contract
May be ratified Can not be ratified; Produces effect until annulled Produces no effect at all; Defect consists of incapacity or Public policy is militated against; vitiated consent; No action is required; Action to annul is required; Does not prescribe; May prescribe; Absolute nullity. Conditional nullity