Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chap.5 Language Issues in ESP (Hedging and Move) )
Chap.5 Language Issues in ESP (Hedging and Move) )
應外系副教授 / 外語中心主任
蘇綉惠 (Patricia Su)
hhsu@cyut.edu.tw
Hedging/ vague language
A feature of academic writing is the nee
d to be cautious in one’s claims or state
ments.
Hedging represents the use of linguistic
devices to show hesitation or uncertaint
y, display politeness and indirectness, a
nd defer to the reader’s point of view
(Hinkel, 1996, 1997).
Hedging/ vague language
George Lakoff termed ‘hedging’ in 1972,
197 that “ words whose job it is to mak
e things fuzzier or less fuzzy.”
Selinker (1979) “an important and nece
ssary feature of ESP/EAP writing.. the w
ell-known practice of hedging in scientifi
c writing
Three ways to comment on a
prediction
Makaya and Bloor (1987)
examined in economics reports.
modal verbs (may, might, etc.)
By hedging Adverbs (possibly, perhaps, etc.)
Adjectives (likely, probably, etc.)
Impersonal verbs (suggest, seem, etc.)
By attribution X expects y …
According to X, the y