PTD 2020 Annual

Inspection
Report-MPT
(Nyaung-U City)

Report Date: 20 Apr 2020

By Propel Network & Kinetic Myanmar
Contents
1. Test Configuration/ Methodology.......................……….…………… ………………………………………………….……….…… 3-5

2. Cluster Drive Route……………..........…………………………….………………………………………...……………...….….…… 6

3. Test Result (KPI) ………………….………………………………………………………………….…………………..……….....…… 6-7

4. Test Result (Plot) …….…..………………………………………..…………………………….……………..………………..……….. 8-16

5. Analysis ………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………….….. 17-39

6. Engineering Parameter …….……………………………......……………………………………………………………………….….. 40-43

7. Conclusion ………………………………………………………………………….………………………………………………….….. 44-45

2
1. Test Configuration / Methodology / Drive Route

3
 Test Configuration & Methodology:
■ Test Configuration & Settings
□ Equipment configuration : Nemo Invex II, Samsung Galaxy S9 , Samsung Galaxy S6, PC Tel Scanner
□ Drive test Date : 24 Mar 2020
□ City Centre : 21.19543 / 94.91011
□ City Radius : 5Km

Test Case

Traffic File
UE Scenario Technology Call Type Idle Time
Time Size
UE1 Short Call Auto mode Short Call 5 Sec 120 S -
UE2 MOS Originating Call Auto mode Short Call 5 Sec 120 S -
UE3 MOS Terminating Call Auto mode Short Call 5 Sec 120 S -
UE4 Short Message Service Auto mode Messaging 5 Sec - -

UE5 Download Throughput Auto mode HTTP 5 Sec 9999 S 100 Mb

Download
HTTP
UE6 Upload Throughput Auto mode 5 Sec 9999 S 100 Mb
Upload
Ext-1 Scanner - - - - -

4
Drive Route :

5
2. QOS KPI

6
MPT QOS KPI :
Test KPI Incar Threshold Result Pass/Fail
RSRP (Scanner)  
>=-95dBm (%) >=-121dBm 54.23% PASS
-95 > X >= -105dBm (%) >=-121dBm 23.59% PASS
-105> X >= -115dBm (%) >=-121dBm 16.65% PASS
-115>X>= -121dBm(%) >=-121dBm 4.12% PASS
-121dBm > X (%) >=-121dBm 1.41% FAIL
RSCP(Scanner)
>=-75dBm (%) >=-100dBm 1.36% PASS
-75 > X >= -85dBm (%) >=-100dBm 3.71% PASS
-85 > X >= -95dBm (%) >=-100dBm 6.08% PASS
-95> X >= -100dBm (%) >=-100dBm 4.55% PASS
-100 dBm > X (%) >=-100dBm 84.30% FAIL
Rx Level (Scanner)
>=-75dBm (%) >=-100dBm 93.40% PASS
-75 > X >= -85dBm (%) >=-100dBm 6.60% PASS
-85 > X >= -95dBm (%) >=-100dBm 0.01% PASS
-95> X >= -100dBm (%) >=-100dBm 0.00% PASS
-100dBm > X (%) >=-100dBm 0.00% PASS
Drop Call  
Drop Call Rate (%) <= 2% 0.00% PASS
CSSR  
Call Setup Success Rate (%) >=95% 100% PASS
CCR  
Call Completion Rate (%) >=92% 100% PASS
HOSR
Handover Success Rate (%) >=92% 100% PASS
Setup Time
Call Connection Time <=5s 4.14s PASS
Voice Quality
MOS >=3.5 3.64 PASS
Throughput  
Minimum HTTP Download Throughput => 128Kbps >=128Kbps = 100% 79.83% FAIL
Minimum HTTP Upload Throughput => 64Kbps >=64Kbps = 100% 77.81% FAIL
SMS  
SMS Delivery Success Rate >=97% 96.96% FAIL
Data Established Rate
Packet Data Setup Success Rate >=95% 100% PASS

7
3. Test Plot

8
RSRP Plot(Scanner) - % Cover
% of Sample = 98.59% => Threshold
(RSRP=>-121)

9
CINR Plot(Scanner)

10
RSCP Plot(Scanner) - % Cover
% of Sample => Threshold(RSCP=>-100=15.7%)

11
EcNo Plot(Scanner)

12
Rx Level Plot(Scanner) - % Cover
% of Sample =100%=> Threshold
(Rx Level=>-100)

13
Mean Opinion Score (MOS)

14
HTTP Download

15
HTTP Upload

16
5. Area Of Concerns & Analysis

17
Problematic Region : RSRP (Scanner)
% of Sample = 94.47% => Threshold
(RSRP=>-121)

1
PA
3
PA

PA
2

PA
PA :: Problematic
Problematic Area
Area

18
Problematic Region : RSRP (Scanner) (#PA1)
RSRP (Scanner) CINR

1
PA

1
PA
m

5km
3k

Site

Site
Site

RSRP (Scanner) Analysis:

1. Based on given Engineering parameter, nearest sites are lying over 3km & 5km from
the problematic region causing poor LTE coverage .
2. Elevation is also uneven leading to weak signal penetration.

PA
PA :: Problematic
Problematic Area
Area

19
Problematic Region : RSRP (Scanner) (#PA2)
RSRP (Scanner) CINR

Sites

m
2k
2km
3km Sites

PA2
PA2

RSRP (Scanner) Analysis:

1. Based on given Engineering parameter, nearest site are over 2km & 3km far from the
problematic region that is resulting into poor coverage and quality.
2. Elevation is also uneven leading to weak signal penetration.

PA
PA :: Problematic
Problematic Area
Area

20
Problematic Region : RSRP (Scanner) (#PA3)
RSRP (Scanner) CINR
Site

Site
3
PA

Site

3
Site PA

RSRP (Scanner) Analysis:

1. As per attached photo, sites is 1km far from problematic region based on given
Engineering parameter but we are getting poor coverage and poor signal quality.
2. That’s why, we have to check whether site have alarm or not.

PA
PA :: Problematic
Problematic Area
Area

21
Problematic Region : RSCP (Scanner)
% of Sample => Threshold(RSCP=>-100=15.7%)

PA1

RSCP (Scanner) Analysis:

UMTS coverage(RSCP) fail to meet QOS commitment in most part of the cluster . RSRP and RX level is up
to mark ,but RSCP degraded below -100dBm even in area having UMTS sites. Need to check alarm and
On Air Status of all UMTS Cells as results seems abnormal.
PA
PA :: Problematic
Problematic Area
Area

22
Problematic Region : DL Throughput

2
PA1 PA

3
PA
PA4

PA
PA :: Problematic
Problematic Area
Area

23
Problematic Region : DL Throughput Analysis (#PA1)
DL Throughput RSRP, RSCP
PA1

m
Sites 1k
PA1
m
1k

1km
1km

Technology & Band

PA1
DL Throughput Analysis:
1. Highlighted region have poor throughput and not
meeting QOS commitment as LTE signal strength
degraded and UE fall back to WCDMA technology
from LTE.
2. Based on given Engineering parameter, nearest site
are is 1km far and in dense clutter,
3. Elevation is also uneven leading to weak signal
penetration.

PA
PA :: Problematic
Problematic Area
Area

24
Problematic Region : DL Throughput Analysis (#PA2)
DL Throughput RSRP, RSCP
Site

2
PA 2
PA

2.5
km
EcNo, SNR
2
PA
DL Throughput Analysis:
In problematic area PA2, sites are lying around
2km nearby the problematic region based on
given Engineering parameter resulting into poor
coverage , quality and throughput.

PA
PA :: Problematic
Problematic Area
Area

25
Problematic Region : DL Throughput Analysis (#PA3)
DL Throughput RSRP, RSCP
2km 4km PA3

Sites

5km
Sites

PA3

Technology & Band

DL Throughput Analysis:
1. Highlighted region have poor throughput and not
meeting QOS commitment LTE signal strength
PA3
degraded and UE fall back to WCDMA technology
from LTE.
2. Based on given Engineering parameter, nearest sites
are around 2km, 4km & 5km far from the
problematic region that is resulting into poor
coverage, quality and throughput .
3. Elevation is also uneven leading to weak signal
penetration.

PA
PA :: Problematic
Problematic Area
Area

26
Problematic Region : DL Throughput Analysis (#PA4)
DL Throughput RSRP, RSCP Site

Site
5km

m
Site 2k

PA4

PA4

Technology & Band

DL Throughput Analysis:
1. Highlighted region have poor throughput and not
meeting QOS commitment as LTE signal strength
degraded and UE fall back to WCDMA technology from
LTE.
2. Based on given Engineering parameter, nearest site is
around 2km & 5km far from the problematic region that
is resulting into resulting into poor coverage, quality and
throughput .
PA4 3. Elevation is also uneven leading to weak signal
penetration.

PA
PA :: Problematic
Problematic Area
Area

27
Problematic Region : UL Throughput

PA1

2
PA
PA5

3
PA

4
PA

PA
PA :: Problematic
Problematic Area
Area

28
Problematic Region : UL Throughput Analysis (#PA1)
UL Throughput RSCP Sites

2k
PA1

m
1.5
km
Site
1km
PA1

EcNo

PA1

UL Throughput Analysis:
1. In problematic area PA1, sites are lying around 1km & 2km
nearby the problematic region based on given Engineering
parameter resulting into poor coverage, quality and
throughput .
2. Elevation is also uneven leading to weak signal
penetration.

PA
PA :: Problematic
Problematic Area
Area

29
Problematic Region : UL Throughput Analysis (#PA2)
UL Throughput RSCP

2
2

PA
PA
4km

5km
Sites

EcNo

PA2
UL Throughput Analysis:
1. Based on given Engineering parameter, nearest sites are
around 4km & 5km far from the problematic region that is
resulting into poor coverage, quality and throughput .
2. Elevation is also uneven leading to weak signal
penetration.

PA
PA :: Problematic
Problematic Area
Area

30
Problematic Region : UL Throughput Analysis (#PA3)
UL Throughput RSCP

3
PA
Site

Site

Site 3
PA

Site

EcNo

UL Throughput Analysis:
Signal Quality degraded in the problematic
3
region leading to poor throughput .Need to
PA
check traffic load and alarm on nearby site .

PA
PA :: Problematic
Problematic Area
Area

31
Problematic Region : UL Throughput Analysis (#PA4)
UL Throughput RSCP Site

1km
3k
Site

1km
3km Site

4
3k m PA

4
PA

EcNo

UL Throughput Analysis:
1. In problematic area PA4, sites are lying around 1km & 3km
nearby the problematic region based on given Engineering
resulting into poor coverage, quality and throughput .
2. Elevation is also uneven leading to weak signal
penetration.
4
PA

PA
PA :: Problematic
Problematic Area
Area

32
Problematic Region : UL Throughput Analysis (#PA5)
UL Throughput RSCP
Site
m
1.5k

2km
PA5 PA5

Site

Technology & Band

UL Throughput Analysis:
1. Highlighted region have poor throughput and not
meeting QOS commitment as LTE signal strength
PA5 degraded and UE fall back to WCDMA technology
from GSM.
2. Based on given Engineering parameter, nearest site
is around 2km & 1.5km far from the problematic
region that is resulting into poor coverage, quality
and throughput .
3. Elevation is also uneven leading to weak signal
penetration.

PA
PA :: Problematic
Problematic Area
Area

33
Problematic Region : SMS
PA1

PA3

PA2

PA
PA :: Problematic
Problematic Area
Area

34
Problematic Region : SMS Analysis (#PA1, #PA2 & #PA3)
SMS Send Failure SMS Send Attempt

PA1

PA3

PA2

SMS Send Success

SMS Analysis:
Out of 692 SMS attempt, 21 SMS fails occur resulting into poor
SMS success rate. Need to check why few area happening so
many SMS fail.

PA
PA :: Problematic
Problematic Area
Area

35
6. Engineering Parameter

36
Physical Antenna Parameter Information
           

Sr. No. Site ID Latitude Longitude Township Division Site Type Tower Height

           
1 MDY00159 21.19261 94.90469 Nyaung-U OnAir GF 42
2 MDY00216 21.20549 94.91234 Nyaung-U OnAir GF 42
3 MDY00224 21.19168 94.88858 Nyaung-U OnAir GF 42
4 MDY01001 21.17115 94.92044 Nyaung-U OnAir GF 11
5 MDY01002 21.197326 94.917573 Nyaung-U OnAir GF 11
6 MDY01003 21.19547 94.90721 Nyaung-U OnAir RT 9
7 MDY01004 21.163777 94.92655 Nyaung-U OnAir RT 5
8 MDY01005 21.17933 94.9254 Nyaung-U OnAir GF 11
9 MDY01006 21.17603 94.91736 Nyaung-U OnAir GF 11
10 MDY01007 21.18329 94.91152 Nyaung-U OnAir GF 11

37
Physical Antenna Parameter Information
           

Sr. No. Site ID Latitude Longitude Township Division Site Type Tower Height

           
11 MDY01008 21.18848 94.91533 Nyaung-U OnAir GF 11
12 MDY01009 21.20599 94.91715 Nyaung-U OnAir GF 11
13 MDY01011 21.19911 94.90453 Nyaung-U OnAir RT 3.5
14 MDY01018 21.15734 94.93193 Nyaung-U OnAir GF 15
15 MDY01600 21.184109 94.87712 Nyaung-U OnAir COW 30

38
Site Location:

39
7. Conclusion

40
Conclusion:
Overall Performance :
1. Rx Level signal strength is meeting the QOS commitment .
2. Voice KPI such as CSSR, CCR, HOSR, DCR & Call setup time are also lying
within the range of threshold.
3. Data Established rate is also maintained to 100%.

Area Of Concern :
4. RSRP and RSCP signal strength are not meeting as per QOS commitment
in few area. Coverage is mostly degraded in few region where have no nearby site.
2. Download throughput is not meeting as per QOS commitment in few area.
Throughput is mostly degraded in few region where UE either fall back to WCDMA
technology or have poor coverage.
3. Upload throughput is not meeting as per QOS commitment in few area.
4. 21 SMS send failures occur leading to drop in SMS success rate.

41
Thank You

42