The document discusses data analysis from a questionnaire on contract management inefficiencies in rural road projects. It was sent via Google Forms to 71 respondents including engineers from the Health Building Section of DUDBC and contractors. 42 responses were received, with a 100% response rate from the 6 engineers and a 55% response rate from the 36 contractor representatives.
The document discusses data analysis from a questionnaire on contract management inefficiencies in rural road projects. It was sent via Google Forms to 71 respondents including engineers from the Health Building Section of DUDBC and contractors. 42 responses were received, with a 100% response rate from the 6 engineers and a 55% response rate from the 36 contractor representatives.
The document discusses data analysis from a questionnaire on contract management inefficiencies in rural road projects. It was sent via Google Forms to 71 respondents including engineers from the Health Building Section of DUDBC and contractors. 42 responses were received, with a 100% response rate from the 6 engineers and a 55% response rate from the 36 contractor representatives.
INTERPRETATION • The questionnaires related to inefficiencies in contract management practice in rural roads were sent to the corresponding respondents via email through the Google Forms. The study targeted a sample size of 71 respondents including 6 Engineers of Health Building Section of DUDBC and 36 Contractor’s representatives basically, Engineers/PM. Out of the above 71, the number of responses collected from respondents is 42. • Table 4.1: Questionnaire Response Rate • S.N. Descriptions Sample Size Actual Response Percentage • 1. HBS Engineer 6 6 100% • 2. Contractor’s Engineers/PM 65 36 55% • 36