To write effective tests, three criteria must be met:
1. Tasks must represent what students are expected to be able to do.
2. Tasks must elicit valid writing samples that reflect students' true abilities.
3. Scoring rubrics and procedures must ensure samples are reliably assessed.
To write effective tests, three criteria must be met:
1. Tasks must represent what students are expected to be able to do.
2. Tasks must elicit valid writing samples that reflect students' true abilities.
3. Scoring rubrics and procedures must ensure samples are reliably assessed.
To write effective tests, three criteria must be met:
1. Tasks must represent what students are expected to be able to do.
2. Tasks must elicit valid writing samples that reflect students' true abilities.
3. Scoring rubrics and procedures must ensure samples are reliably assessed.
representative of the population of tasks that we should expect the students to be able to perform. 2. The tasks should elicit valid samples of writing (which truly represent the student’s ability) 3. It is essential that the samples of writing can and will be scored reliably. Representative tasks
i) Specify all possible content (operations, types
of text, addressees, length of texts, topics, dialect and style) ii) Include a representative sample of the specified content: try to select a representative set of tasks. The more tasks (within reason) that we set, the more representative of a candidate’s ability (the more valid). If a test includes a wide ranging and representative sample of specifications, the test is more likely to have a beneficial backwash effect. Elicit a valid sample of writing ability
Set as many separate tasks as is feasible:
Candidates performance on a task or different tasks can’t be always consistent, so we have to offer candidates as many “fresh starts” as possible, and each task may represent a fresh start. Test only writing ability, nothing else. Test writing not creativity, imagination, general knowledge, etc. Restrict candidates: Writing tasks should be well defined, candidates should know just what it is required. (specify length, give notes, clues or pictures). Ensure valid and reliable scoring
Set tasks which can be reliably scored.
Set as many tasks as possible Restrict candidates Give no choice of tasks Ensure long enough samples Create appropriate scales for scoring Calibrate the scale to be used Select and train scorers Follow acceptable scoring procedures Holistic vs Analytic Scoring
Holistic (Impressionistic) involves the assignment of a
single score to a piece of writing on the basis of an overall impression of it. An advantage is that it can be very rapid. Analytic Scoring requires a separate score for each of a number of aspects of a task. Advantages: 1.It disposes of the problem of uneven development of subskills 2. Scorers are compelled to consider aspects of performance which they might otherwise ignore 3. The very fact that the scorer has to give a number of scores will tend to make scoring more reliable.