This document discusses methods for estimating activity duration in construction project management. It describes:
1) Factors that can cause variation in actual activity duration from estimates such as varying skill levels, unexpected events, work efficiency, and mistakes.
2) Six common methods for estimating activity duration - similarity to past projects, historical data, expert advice, Delphi technique, three-point technique, and wide-band Delphi technique.
3) The Delphi technique involves gathering anonymous estimates from a group through multiple iterations to reach consensus. The wide-band Delphi uses both the Delphi approach and three-point estimates of optimistic, pessimistic, and most likely durations.
This document discusses methods for estimating activity duration in construction project management. It describes:
1) Factors that can cause variation in actual activity duration from estimates such as varying skill levels, unexpected events, work efficiency, and mistakes.
2) Six common methods for estimating activity duration - similarity to past projects, historical data, expert advice, Delphi technique, three-point technique, and wide-band Delphi technique.
3) The Delphi technique involves gathering anonymous estimates from a group through multiple iterations to reach consensus. The wide-band Delphi uses both the Delphi approach and three-point estimates of optimistic, pessimistic, and most likely durations.
This document discusses methods for estimating activity duration in construction project management. It describes:
1) Factors that can cause variation in actual activity duration from estimates such as varying skill levels, unexpected events, work efficiency, and mistakes.
2) Six common methods for estimating activity duration - similarity to past projects, historical data, expert advice, Delphi technique, three-point technique, and wide-band Delphi technique.
3) The Delphi technique involves gathering anonymous estimates from a group through multiple iterations to reach consensus. The wide-band Delphi uses both the Delphi approach and three-point estimates of optimistic, pessimistic, and most likely durations.
o Activity duration is a random variable. Because we
don’t know what factors will be operative when work is underway on an activity, we cannot know exactly how long it will take. o There will, of course, be varying estimates with varying precision for each activity. Estimating Activity Duration
o One of your goals in estimating activity duration is to
define the activity to a level of granularity so that your estimates have a narrow variance o That is, the estimate is as good as you can get it at the planning stages of the project. o As project work is completed, you will be able to improve the earlier estimates of activities scheduled later in the project. Variation in Activity Duration
o There are several causes of variation in the actual
activity duration: o Varying skill levels o Unexpected events o Efficiency of work time o Mistakes and misunderstandings o Common cause variation Varying skill levels
o You may get a higher- or lower-skilled person
assigned to the activity, causing the actual duration to vary from planned duration. Unexpected events
o These include Random acts of nature, delays,
incorrect shipments of materials, traffic jams, power failures etc. Efficiency of work time
o Every time a worker is interrupted, it takes more time to
get up to the level of productivity. o You cannot control the frequency or time of interruptions, but you do know that they will happen. Mistakes and misunderstandings
o There may be some sort of non intentional mistakes
or misunderstandings that can cause the delay of a particular activities. Common cause variation
o Apart from all of these factors that can influence
activity duration, the reality is that durations will vary for no reason other than the statistical variation that arises because the duration is in fact a random variable. o It has a natural variation, and nothing you do can really decrease that variation. Six Methods for Estimating Activity Duration o Similarity to other activities o Historical data o Expert advice o Delphi technique o Three-point technique o Wide-band Delphi technique Similarity to other activities
o Some of the activities in your WBS may be similar to
activities completed in other projects. o Your or others’ recollections of those activities and their duration can be used to estimate the present activity’s duration. o In most cases, using the estimates from those activities provides estimates that are good enough. Historical data
o Every good project management methodology contains a
project notebook that records the estimated and actual activity duration. o This historical record can be used on other projects. o The recorded data becomes your knowledge base for estimating activity duration. o This technique differs from the previous technique in that it uses a record, rather than depending on memory. Expert advice
o When the project involves a breakthrough technology or
a technology that is being used for the first time in the organization, there may not be any local experience or even professionals skilled in the technology within the organization. o In these cases, you will have to appeal to outside authorities. Delphi technique
o The Delphi technique can produce good estimates in
the absence of expert advice. o This is a group technique that extracts and summarizes the knowledge of the group to arrive at an estimate. o After the group is briefed on the project and the nature of the activity, each individual in the group is asked to make his or her best guess of the activity duration. Delphi technique
o The results are tabulated and presented, as shown in
Figure to the group in a histogram labeled First Pass. o Those participants whose estimates fall in the outer quartiles are asked to share the reason for their guess. o After listening to the arguments, each group member is asked to guess again. o The results are presented as a histogram labeled Second Pass, and again the outer quartile estimates are defended. Delphi technique
o A third guess is made, and the histogram plotted is
labeled Third Pass. o Final adjustments are allowed. o The average of the third guess is used as the group’s estimate. Delphi technique Three-point technique
o To use the three-point technique you need three estimates of
activity duration: o Optimistic. The optimistic time is defined as the shortest duration one has had or might expect to experience given that everything happens as expected. o Pessimistic. The pessimistic time is that duration that would be experienced (or has been experienced) if everything that could go wrong did go wrong, yet the activity was completed. o Most likely. The most likely time is that time usually experienced. Wide-band Delphi technique o Combining the Delphi and three-point methods results in the wide-band Delphi technique. o It involves a panel, as in the Delphi technique. In place of a single estimate, the panel members are asked, at each iteration, to give their optimistic, pessimistic, and most likely estimates for the duration of the chosen activity. o The results are compiled, and any extreme estimates are removed. o Averages are computed for each of the three estimates, and the averages are used as the optimistic, pessimistic, and most likely estimates of activity duration. Wide-band Delphi technique Organizational breakdown structure (OBS)