COLEGIO DE DAGUPAN ACTION

RESEARCH MANUSCRIPT
STANDARD CONTENTS &
FORMATTING REQUIREMENTS
REYNALD JAY F HIDALGO, Ph․D․
Assistant Vice President for Academic Affairs
DEAN, School of Information Technology Education
MEMBER, Oral Defense Committee
Sample Interventions
• Multisensory Strategy (Performance in Grade 1 Math)
• Children’s Song (Reading Skills of Kinder)
• Collaborative Strategy (ICT Skills of Grade 8)
• Differentiated Instruction (Academic Performance)
• Guided Dialogue (Speaking Skills)
• Response Card (Academic Performance of Grade 10)
• Explicit Timing Strategy (Mathematics Performance)
• Peer Tutoring Strategy (Mathematics Performance)
Sample Interventions
• Cooperative Learning
• Circle Chart Technique (Reading)
• Guided Reading Strategy
• Problem-Base Approach (Mathematics)
• Strategic Intervention Materials
• Computer Aided Instruction
• Manipulative Materials (Math)
• Remedial Teaching
• Drill Cards
• Phonics Instruction (Kinder)
• Fishbone Approach (Araling Panlipunan)
• Game-Based Learning
• Sight Words
Sample Descriptive Evaluative Researches
• Classroom Management Skills of TLE Teachers in …
• Effects of Social Dances in the Health Awareness…
• Stress Coping Mechanisms of…
• 21st Century Leadership Skills of…
• Innovative Teaching Strategies of…
• Challenges and Strategies in Strengthening PTA Roles…
• Status of Child Protection Policy…
• The Instructional Supervision Practices of…
• Classroom Disciplinary Problems Encountered by Elementary Teachers…
• Assessment of Bullying in…
Basic Parts

 Preliminaries
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODOLOGY
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
 Bibliography
 Appendices
Preliminaries
 Title Page
 Approval Form
 Abstract
 Acknowledgement
 Dedication
 Table of Contents
 List of Tables
 List of Figures
Chapter 1
INTRODUCTION
 Background of the Study
 Conceptual Framework
 Paradigm of the Study
 Statement of the Problem (SOP)
 Hypothesis
 Significance of the Study
 Chapter 1- Background of the Study
INDICATOR MINIMUM NUMBER
OF PAGE/S
 an overview of what the research is all about 2
describing the problem situation

 includes current data on the performance of the 1

target respondents

 justify the existence of the problem by citing 2

statistical data and authoritative sources
 Chapter 1- Background of the Study
INDICATOR MINIMUM NUMBER
OF PAGE/S
 Presents and discusses the intervention selected 2
including a brief history of the intervention and
its developers/proponents

 Presents researches relevant to the 3

effectiveness of the chosen intervention
Min of 5 citations
 Includes the aim of the action research 2
 Chapter 1- Conceptual Framework
INDICATOR MINIMUM NUMBER
OF PAGE/S
 Identify and discuss the variables included in 1
the study
Chapter 1- Paradigm of the Study
INPUT PROCESS OUTPUT

 Administer pre- Difference

test examination between the Test
 Test Scores before  Use the Scores of Grade 3
<intervention Pupils In
the use of the
approach> for Mathematics
<intervention>
 Test Scores after <duration> before and after
 Administer post- the use of
the use of the
test examination <intervention>
<intervention>
 Test for the
difference Effectiveness of
between the the <intervention>
pretest and post-
test scores

feedback
 Chapter 1- Statement of the Problem
INDICATOR MINIMUM NUMBER
OF PAGE/S
 Presents a main problem followed by specific 1
problems
 Chapter 1- Hypothesis
INDICATOR MINIMUM NUMBER
OF PAGE/S
 Presents when comparison of measurable data 1
or test for relationships is part of the subject of
the Action Research (with the SOP)
 Chapter 1- Significance of the Study
INDICATOR MINIMUM NUMBER
OF PAGE/S
 Presents how the findings of the research is 1
beneficial to the respondents and to the other
stakeholders. (with the SOP)
Chapter 2
METHODOLOGY
 Research Design
 Sources of Data
 Instrumentation
 Data Collection
 Tools for Data Analysis.
 Chapter 2- Research Design
INDICATOR MINIMUM NUMBER
OF PAGE/S
 Presents the identified design 5
 Uses the STATE-DEFINE-JUSTIFY rule
(across Chapter 2)

<STATE>The researcher made use of quasi-experimental pretest-posttest

design. <DEFINE-at least two definitions> Saunders (2016) defined √ as ...
According to Cooper (2018), descriptive research is… <JUSTIFY- relate
and discuss thoroughly why you selected such design> The researcher
selected the use of descriptive research because…
 Chapter 2- Sources of Data
INDICATOR MINIMUM NUMBER
OF PAGE/S
 described the place where the study was 5
conducted including the research population or
the sampling method used in determining the (across Chapter 2)
subjects of the study.
 Chapter 2- Instrumentation and Data
Collection
INDICATOR MINIMUM NUMBER
OF PAGE/S
 Uses the STATE-DEFINE-JUSTIFY rule 5
 describe the instrument, what is measured, how
it was interpreted and to whom and how it was (across Chapter 2)
administered
 mention the type of instruments used including
the rating scales, schedule when the
intervention is conducted, tally sheets,
performance checklists and others
 include a discussion on the test conducted to
ensure the validity and reliability
 Chapter 2- Tools for Data Analysis
INDICATOR MINIMUM NUMBER
OF PAGE/S
 Uses the STATE-DEFINE-JUSTIFY rule 5
 present the statistical tools or the treatment
employed in the analysis and interpretation of (across Chapter 2)
the collected data
 describe the tools used for data analysis for
each of the problems
 numerical and descriptive values to interpret
data is determined and justified
Chapter 3
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 contains sub-sections which are one-to-one
correspondence with the number of sub-
problems in the SOP.
Chapter 3
Given the following SOPs:
1 . What is the performance of the Grade 5 pupils before and after the use of graphic organizers?
2 . Is there a significant difference between the performance of the Grade 5 pupils before and after
the use of graphic organizers?
 
Sub-sections in Chapter 3 will be:

Performance of the Grade 5 pupils Before and After the Use of Graphic Organizers (for SOP number
1)
<DISCUSSIONS>
Difference Between the Performance of the Grade 5 pupils Before and After the Use of Graphic
Organizers (for SOP number 2)
< DISCUSSIONS >
Chapter 3
The PRESENT-SHOW-DISCUSS is followed in the presentation of tables/figures/plates.
Example:
Performance of the Grade 5 pupils Before and After the Use of Graphic Organizers
<PRESENT the figure> Figure 3.1 presents the test scores of the Grade 5 pupils
before the use of graphic organizers.
<SHOW the figure>

<FIGURE TITLE>(in the case of tables, the TABLE TITLE is placed above the table)

<DISCUSS and analyze the contents of the figure (for tables, avoid table
reading)> < include at least 4 cross-references>
Chapter 4
SUMMARY, CONCLUSSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 Summary
 Conclusions
 Recommendations
 Chapter 4- Summary
INDICATOR MINIMUM NUMBER
OF PAGE/S
 Research objectives 4
 SOP in paragraph form
 Summary of the methodology (across Chapter 4)
 Salient findings (including the results of the
hypothesis testing)
 Chapter 4- Conclusion
INDICATOR MINIMUM NUMBER
OF PAGE/S
 brief, generalized statements deduced from the 4
findings to answer the general and sub-
problems (across Chapter 4)
 aligned to the research problems, briefly
worded and directly answering in sequential
order the research problem
 are not restatement of the findings and free
from any misleading impression, bias or unfair
and incorrect generalization
 Stated in paragraph form
 Chapter 4- Recommendations
INDICATOR MINIMUM NUMBER
OF PAGE/S
 acceptable and relevant suggestions that offer 4
solutions to the problems or issues presented in
the study based from the conclusions (across Chapter 4)
 presented in an enumerated and numbered
format
Bibliography
• Include all materials used and reviewed by the researcher
• Use the APA format

Darina Dicheva, Christo Dichev, Gennady Agre, & Galia Angelova. (2015).
Gamification in Education: A Systematic Mapping Study. Journal of
Educational Technology & Society,18(3), 75-88. Retrieved from
http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.18.3.75

Jen-Wei Chang, & Hung-Yu Wei. (2016). Exploring Engaging Gamification

Mechanics in Massive Online Open Courses. Journal of Educational
Technology & Society, 19(2), 177-203. Retrieved from
http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.19.2.177
Appendices
 Permit to Conduct the Study
 Raw Data used in the Study
 Pretest and Posttest evaluation tools
 List of instructional materials used with brief description/s
 Schedule on the conduct of the experiment
 Pictures of the Intervention materials used
 Pictures while conducting the study (not during the pretest
and posttest assessment)
Curriculum Vitae
How Will You be Rated?
• 80 percent correctness of manuscriot vis-à-vis the prescribed
template
• 20 percent performance during the defense (including organization of
presentation and the ability to respond to questions)
Important Reminders
• 10 days after the final defense, each day late minus 1 direct to the
grade
• CD Copy of manuscripts will be CHECKED!
• No Chapter Introduction across ALL CHAPTERS
Frequently Asked Questions
• Would you explain your intervention
• Why did you chose that intervention?
• How long did you performed your experiment? When did you start?
• What was the lessons you discussed during your experiment?
• Explain your intervention
• Why are the scores very high/very low? What are your observations?
• How did you grouped your pupils?
• How many participants are there in your experiment?
Additional Reminders
• Submission of checklist evaluation duly signed by your professor-
August 25, 2019
• Submit transfer credentials to the Registrar’s Office ASAP to facilitate
checklist evaluation (provide a photocopy of your credentials attached
to your checklist to your professor/adviser)
• Request for fb account Expy Ol; request for the group (this will be our
means of communication)