Chapter 4 Brown (P

You might also like

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 18

Chapter 4 Brown (p.

86-114)
Entry behavior

Goal formulation

Method of training

Evaluation
procedures
Steps how
training would go
Learning Theories based on 4 Psychologists

Behavioral
Cognitive stance
viewpoint
(Ausubel)
(Pavlov&Skinner)

A constructivist
school of thought
(Rogers)
Pavlov’s Classical Behaviorism

A dog – a bell – salivation

Stimulus?
Conditioned response?
Drawing on Pavlov’s Finding, John B. Watson (1913) coined
the term behaviorism  rejecting mentalistic notions of
innateness and instinct.

Later, E.L Thorndike expanded the theory and came up with


the Thorndike’s Law of Effect (paved a way for B.F. Skinner)
Skinner vs Pavlov

Skinner Pavlov
Operant Conditioning Respondent Conditioning 
one ‘operates’ on the concern on responded behavior
environment elicited by preceding stimulus
Deemphasizing stimuli  Emphasizing the stimuli
concern more on the
consequences
Reponses emitted and governed Responses elicited by identifiable
by the consequences they stimuli
produce
Rely on reinforces to strengthen Merely rely on the association of
the behavior a prior stimulus with a following
response
Discussion:
How might behaviorism take
place in a foreign language
classroom?
Ausubel’s Subsumption Theory

Subsumption a process of relating and


anchoring new material to relevant established
entities in cognitive structure
Rote learning vs meaningful learning

Rote Learning
Meaningful Learning
 Process of acquiring
 As new material enters the
material as discrete and
cognitive field, it interacts
isolated entities
with and subsumed under
 Not permitting the
a more inclusive
establishment of
conceptual system
meaningful relationship
 Dealing with retention and
 e.g learning necessary
long term memory
phone numbers
Systematic Forgetting Ausubel

 Cognitive pruning procedure  the elimination of


unnecessary clutter for more necessary material to enter the
cognitive field.
 Language attrition  the loss of second language skills is
possible. (possible in bilingualism)

Do you think language attrition might


be beneficial?
Have you ever experienced a language
attrition?
Rogers’s Humanistic Psychology

 Has more of an affective focus than a cognitive one


 Highlighting the social and interactive nature of learning just like
Vygotsky
 His idea is in contrast to Skinner’s
 Rogers studied the “whole person” as a physical and cognitive,
but a primarily emotional being
 Flaws valuable time is lost in the process of allowing students
to discover facts and principles for themselves, a nonthreatening
environment might omit the classroom tension needed for
learning.
8 Types of Learning from Gagne (1965, p.58-59)

1. Signal learning
2. Stimulus-response learning
3. Chaining
4. Verbal association
5. Multiple discrimination
6. Concept learning
7. Principle learning
8. Problem solving
Transfer, Interference, and Overgeneralization

Positive Transfer (prior knowledge


benefits the learning the learning
task)
Transfer
Negative Transfer (previously
learned material interferes with
subsequent material) 
interference

Overgeneralization
e.g. walk-walk, open-opened,
fly-flied
Inductive and Deductive Reasoning

Grammar Translation Method vs Communicative


Language Teaching
Language Aptitude

Is there an ability or ‘talent’ that we can call


foreign language aptitude?
Is so, what is it, and is it innate or
environmentally “nurtured”?

You might also like