Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Private Law Notes 2020
Private Law Notes 2020
2. Natural persons
3. Property
4. Tort law
5. Law of contract
6. Legal systems
7. Intellectual property
It’s “A body of rules for the guidance of human conduct which are
imposed upon and enforced among the members of a given state”.
The courses Comparative Personal, Family and Inheritance Law,
Comparative Contract Law,
Comparative Property Law, Intellectual Property Law, and partly
Banking and Securities Law focus on questions that fall under t
he notion of private law/civil law.
Thereby, it is first necessary to briefly outline the major
characteristics of private/civil law and place our subject
matter within the system of private/civil law.
This is what the first lecture will be about.
collected and prepared by
Mohamed Abdi Kadiye, Contacts:
+252613323723, Email:
mckadiye@hotmail.com
A preliminary remark must be made that the attempts t
o structure law in the way presented below and
identify separate body of civil law is shared in
most civil law
jurisdictions originating in continental Europe.
However, these may not be reflected so much
in the legal thinking of common law jurisdictions. Neve
rtheless,
On the one hand the choice of our subject matter perso
nal, family and inheritance law displays the characterist
ics of the civil law.
collected and prepared by
Mohamed Abdi Kadiye, Contacts:
+252613323723, Email:
mckadiye@hotmail.com
Private law is that part of a civil law legal system which is
part of the jus commune that involves relationships
between individuals, such as the law of Torts, contracts,
intellectual property, family law, law of succession and
commercial law.
One involves equality between the players: legal
subjects are free to enter into the legal relations
of their choice, and they have the power to
mutually influence the contents of their relation:
their rights and obligations.
Eventually this happens when persons enter into
legal relations with each other as private parties,
within their private capacities.
collected and prepared by
Mohamed Abdi Kadiye, Contacts:
+252613323723, Email:
mckadiye@hotmail.com
Example;
When Janis and Inga decide, that Janis will buy Inga’s watch, they both have the
option to decide whether or not Janis will buy and Inga will sell the
watch – that is to say, whether to make the contract for the
sale of Inga’s watch.
The same is true of the question of what the major conditions of the deal should be
the-price, time and place of performance, supplementing services
such as whether or not Inga will provide Janis with extra batteries, etc.
All these issues are decided by the parties mutually and either of
the two parties can at any time say “no” to what the other party proposes.
The same is true of other kinds of private relations, e.g. whether or not
they will want to start seeing each other and later on be married to each other.
For example, when Janis has to pay taxes to the tax authority of his
country, he can not say “no, I do not want to pay taxes,
i.e. I do not want to enter into a tax paying relationship with you”.
He cannot alter the terms of the relationship with the tax authorities either: he can not say “oh, I
am willing to pay taxes, but less –or at a later time – than required”.
Or, if Janis suddenly
were to kill someone and the police were to arrest him, then the prosecution to charge and
finally the court to sentence him, he can not tell the
police, the prosecutor or the court “leave me alone, I do not want to enter into a
legal relationship with you”.
It is easy to discover that in these examples the representatives of “the
other side” the tax authority officer, the policeman, the prosecutor, the
judge did not act in their private capacities like Inga when selling her
watch to Janis.
They acted in a capacity to represent the interests of the public rather than of the
private individual.
To the tax authority officer as a private person it is likely not to matter whether Janis
pays taxes or not; however, to the public interest of the
community (the state) whom he represents, it is important that legal subjects pay the
ir due taxes.
There,by,in all these situations it is a public interest that overwrite
s the equality and freedom of the other party
enjoyed in private relations.
It is not difficult to recognize that the public interest that
prevails over the autonomy of the private individual is represented
by the state.
collected and prepared by
Mohamed Abdi Kadiye, Contacts:
+252613323723, Email:
mckadiye@hotmail.com
In legal relations where the parties act freely, they act in their own private interests
as private individuals or in another word as civilians.
Thereby, this area of law is named private law or civil law. In cases where
one of the parties lacks this freedom whereas the other has a compelling power to
bind the other party, it is usually for the interests of the public.
Thereby, this area of law is named public law.
Private or civil law covers such cases as company law, where relations are between
private individuals who want to associate for a
common business purpose and set up a company of their own to pursue a profit‐making
activity; contract law where
equals are making deals between themselves; family law, where private individuals
get together for the purposes of establishing a family through marriage, having-
children and taking care of and raising their children; copyright law, where one
individual creates a piece in the literary, artistic or scientific domain for the use
and enjoyment of all others in society, etc.
The course Comparative administrative and
constitutional law, which students have had by the t
ime they
encounter their first private law courses, was a goo
d example of public law fields.
collected and prepared by
Mohamed Abdi Kadiye, Contacts:
+252613323723, Email:
mckadiye@hotmail.com
Note that the contrast of private and public law
does not cover the entire legal system, albeit it
fairly well covers the overwhelming majority of legal
relations.
For example the branch of private international law
(conflict of laws) deals with situations in which the
subjects of the legal relationship are not the state and subordinated le
gal subjects such as
taxpayers, criminal offenders, etc., as in public law, or private persons
acting in theoretically
equal positions such as in private law, but legal systems between whic
h a choice has to be
made because the case is factually connected to more than one legal s
ystem.
collected and prepared by
Mohamed Abdi Kadiye, Contacts:
+252613323723, Email:
mckadiye@hotmail.com
On the other hand, common law thinking often
comes to the same conclusions as civil law, even if
through different lines of thought.
It is, however, not the objective of this course to deal
in detail with the underlying differences between common
law and civil law, such as the source of law (judge‐
made law versus codified legislation); or the importance of the
differences between public and private law rules within the
same branch or field of law (whereas in common law the
rules of both public and private law nature may mix within the
same branch or legal field while civil law places a higher
importance on the separation of these two kinds of norms in its str
ucture of categorization), etc.
collected and prepared by
Mohamed Abdi Kadiye, Contacts:
+252613323723, Email:
mckadiye@hotmail.com
These issues are to be discussed within
other courses, such as legal history and
comparative law.
In this present lecture we will use the terms private law and civil law inte
rchangeably, to conform
students to both terms.
Roughly speaking, civil law is the name of private law in
civil law jurisdictions.
collected and prepared by
Mohamed Abdi Kadiye, Contacts:
+252613323723, Email:
mckadiye@hotmail.com
Chapter two
Natural persons
While the former has moral and historical significance, the latter is of great
practical importance. It denotes the eligibility to become a principal of
particular legal relations, and the issue is usually encountered in the negative,
when we speak of (special legal) incapacity.
To the extent that such ineligibility can be general or limited, there is a further
distinction between absolute (Articles 16, 45, 47 of the Somali Civil Code) and
relative special legal incapacity (Articles 112-114 of the Somali civil code).
An example of the absolute kind is that minors under the age of 15 may not
do work involving heavy labor; of the relative kind, that A, having killed or
attempted to kill B, cannot then become his heir.
(Art 724 of the Somali civil code and Sharia norms)) and
rights relating to gifts (Art 483 of the Somali civil code). For
example, if A leaves part of his estate to nephew B, the son
of C, and the rest to his sons C and D, it is important to
know if B was born dead, in which case his intended legacy
will be divided between C and D, or whether he died
immediately after being born alive, in which case his
intended legacy will devolve to C, and D will receive only the
part he was originally intended to have if B had survived.
collected and prepared by
Mohamed Abdi Kadiye, Contacts:
+252613323723, Email:
mckadiye@hotmail.com
The law also provides for unborn children, already conceived, as well as
those who, at the time of the relevant disposition, have not yet been
conceived but could subsequently be born.
If, therefore, the fetus was in a poor condition at the moment it came into
being, the problem arises of imputing this condition to the parents; if,
however, its condition deteriorates during pregnancy or during labor, this is
evidence of a civil wrong for which whoever caused it is liable
In such cases, unless the missing person already has a legal representative, a
trustee is appointed. A request can be made to the court by any interested
party.
The trustee’s powers are wider than those of guardians for persons under a
disability as they can be given a general authority to perform acts of
disposition.
collected and prepared by
Mohamed Abdi Kadiye, Contacts:
+252613323723, Email:
mckadiye@hotmail.com
Absence:
A disappearance which continues longer than two years is defined as an absence.
A declaration of absence, made by a court, can be requested by presumptive heirs and by anyone
with an interest.
The effects of such declaration are significant, as it gives rise to a legal uncertainty as to whether the
absentee is still alive; his rights are provisionally transferred to the presumptive heirs and legatees,
who may also request the temporary discharge of possession of goods by posting a bond with the
court. An inventory is made prior to discharge to prevent any misappropriation by the possessor.
The discharge permits acts of management, the representation of the absentee, the benefit of rents
and revenues. Any acts of disposition must, however, receive the consent of the court.
If only one parent has such authority, he or she is the minor’s sole
representative. Parents with parental authority may separately execute
acts of management such as collecting or gathering claims and
revenues.
These conditions must exist at the moment the legal act in question is perfected, and specific
and rigorous proof of it must be adduced in order for the act to be annulled.
Since the law is concerned to protect those who, by reason of natural incapacity, are in a
weaker position and more exposed to risk than others, it is laid down that contracts
concluded by persons while in such a state are voidable if it is proved that: one party was in a
state of natural incapacity; the other acted in bad faith because he knew of this circumstance;
and the agreement was prejudicial to the incapacitated person (Art 45, and 109 of the Somali
civil code).
Knowledge on the part of the other party need not be shown (merely incapacity and economic
prejudice) when the incapacitated person has acted unilaterally.
Finally, some acts, such as marriage, wills and gifts, are so important, either intrinsically or
because the exercise of will is of the essence, that they can be annulled simply upon proof of
natural incapacity
(2) There shall be only one Somali citizenship, and the House of the
People of the Federal Parliament of Somalia shall enact a special law
that shall define how to obtain, suspend, or lose it.
General characteristics.
Person and ‘statuses
The Constitution guarantees certain rights defined as inviolable (Arts 13- 21 of
the Federal Constitution)).
These rights are protected for every individual, but at the same time the
Constitution imposes a concomitant duty of political, economic and social
solidarity on everyone.
The concept of status is a traditional one, but it is flexible enough to evolve over time.
Roman law recognized statuses of liberty, citizenship and family.
Today liberty is guaranteed to all, citizenship to whoever is born in Somali (and to those
who acquire it by other means).
Family status still exists, in the form of spouses, legitimate and natural children. Other
laws are recognized as well, such as that of worker, with rights guaranteed by the
Constitution (Arts 23 and 24 of the Federal Constitution).
The expressions personal rights, personality rights and civil protection of private life all
indicate aspects of the same problem: how can an individual, considered as a natural
person, be protected within private relations? Rights relating to an individual qua
personare today regulated above all by constitutional and entrenched laws. Certain
provisions of the civil code also regulate in this area, but these by no means account for
all the rules governing personal rights
(Arts 83–86 of the Somali civil code).
personal rights can be defined as those expressly provided in the civil code and
by certain special laws (such as on copyright).
Second, it can be held that personal rights cannot be counted in this way, for
there is a single overarching right of the person, almost a general principle,
whose specific content is set out from time to time according to the person’s
status.
To put it more precisely: believers of the first school of thought maintain that
there can be no personal rights distinct from those specifically provided by law.
To identify the legal foundations of this viewpoint, not only the rules of
the civil code, but also those deriving from laws and the Constitution must
be taken into account.
Between them these yield the right to life, the right to physical integrity,
the right to physical and mental identity, the right to health, the right to
privacy, and finally the rights specifically governed by the civil code, such
as the right to one’s name, to respect, to the privacy of one’s likeness and
so on.
collected and prepared by
Mohamed Abdi Kadiye, Contacts:
+252613323723, Email:
mckadiye@hotmail.com
The right to life
This absence of a specific rule has for a long time given rise to the
belief that no such right exists to be protected.
collected and prepared by
Mohamed Abdi Kadiye, Contacts:
+252613323723, Email:
mckadiye@hotmail.com
Individual members of groups:
The individual fulfils his personality not only as part of a family, but
also as a member of groups based not on relatedness but on other
common links, such as occupational interests (professional
associations), religious interests (religious associations), political
interests (parties), trade unionism, civil rights interests(movements
promoting the rights of women, disabled people, artistic and cultural
interests (scientific associations) and, especially, economic interests
(commercial companies).
The fact that private property was a natural and inviolable right, it
has also been declared as such in the Constitution.
They give rise to rights and are the object on which these rights are
exerted.
Rights can attach not only to things in a physical sense, but can be
activities, such as the work done by a paid employee, products of the
intellect, aspects of personality such as privacy, identity and so on.
Rights can also attach to energies (Art 82/1 Somali civil code).
Not all things, however, can be the object of rights. Things outside
commerce, such as those serving religious ends, like a mosque do not;
nor do things which belong to everyone, like the air, the sun and sea.
collected and prepared by
Mohamed Abdi Kadiye, Contacts:
+252613323723, Email:
mckadiye@hotmail.com
Goods can be divided into various categories,
according to their nature and content.
The rules on property stem from Art 26 of the Federal Constitution which
states that property is public or private, and further, that economic
property belongs to the State, to bodies or to private persons; the
expression bodies can mean either public or private bodies, whether de
facto or de jure.
The fact that the Constitution provides for private property is significant
because it affords it a protection that could only be removed by laws to
change the Constitution.
Private and public property is regulated also by the civil code and by law.
The civil code sets out many principles drawn on such laws as those on
mines, quarries and peat extraction, on water, fisheries and so on.
Land, whether in town or country, outlives its owner, can be readily subjected
to taxation and is easier to defend. From these circumstances arises a
formalistic and restrictive regime based on its circulation.
Moveable property, on the other hand, can circulate with much more fluidity
and less formality, limitation periods are shorter and simple possession,
suitable evidence of title and good faith are sufficient to secure ownership of
the property, even if the purported transferor was not in fact the owner
(Article 743 of the Somali civil code).
The former are acquired once harvested, the latter mature day by day.
Article 681 of the Somali civil code stipulates that the owner’s powers
are to be exercised ‘within the limits and with observance of the duties
established by the legal order’.
The limits imposed from time to time on private property become ever
greater in number.
The importance of the internal limit is thus clear, and not only in historical terms
collected and prepared by
Mohamed Abdi Kadiye, Contacts:
+252613323723, Email:
mckadiye@hotmail.com
Social function of property
Securing compliance of property means imposing limits on it
which ensure that the use made of it is consistent with the
overall public interest.
Academic opinion differs on this point.
Second, the State may limit it, but any time it applies limits that
constrain its potential use and economic value for the collective
benefit it must compensate the owner.
collected and prepared by
Mohamed Abdi Kadiye, Contacts:
+252613323723, Email:
mckadiye@hotmail.com
Compulsory purchase
Expropriation occurs whenever property is taken from an
owner involuntarily (Article 681 of the Somali civil code).
In this process the expropriator may be the State or a
region or local authority, or indeed a private individual or
concern carrying out an initiative in the public interest.
By Contract or Succession
In the Somali civil code of 1973, property was considered a fundamental aspect
of private law and the code was organized entirely so as to regulate property,
persons with rights to property and the means by which property could be
acquired.
The contract was and remains to be the principal means of transferring property.
As a result the rules of contract were mainly modelled on exchange, that is, the
contract for sale.
Article 143 of the Somali civil code provides that ‘in contracts which have as
their object the transfer of the ownership of a specified thing, the creation or
assignment of a property right or the transfer of some other right, the
ownership or right in question is transferred and acquired by the consent,
legitimately made manifest, of the parties.’
This means that a will common to the parties, translated into an agreement, is
alone sufficient to affect the transfer of property. In other words delivery of the
property is not a prerequisite to concluding a transfer contract.
*The duty is owed to persons generally-*The duty is owed to the parties to the contract
*The remedies are few (restricted) *The remedies are far much wider.
However, under the Government Proceedings Act , the Government is liable for
tortious acts.
The government shall be subject to all those liabilities in tort to which if it were a
full person of full age and capacity it would be subject;
This applies only where the act was done in the exercise of the
sovereignty of the state.
A minor can sue and be sued for tort. A minor can however not sue or be
sued in his own name but by his “next friend” (guardian ad litem ).
In Gorely v Codd (1967), the defendant, a 16 ½ year old boy was held
liable when he accidentally shot the plaintiff with an air rifle in the
course of lurking about.
collected and prepared by
Mohamed Abdi Kadiye, Contacts:
+252613323723, Email:
mckadiye@hotmail.com
Liability of minority
Parents are not liable for the torts of their children, but in situations where it is
established that the child was under control of the parent the commission of the
tort by the child will result to liability of the parent.
collected and prepared by
Mohamed Abdi Kadiye, Contacts:
+252613323723, Email:
mckadiye@hotmail.com
• Persons Of Unsound Mind
See Article 161 (1)(2) inter alia
Liability depends on whether the person knew what he was doing when he committed the
tort. This can be proven by a psychiatrist.
In Morris v. Mardsen (1952), the defendant rented a room at a hotel. While there he
attacked the manager of the hotel. At that time he was suffering from a disease of the
mind. It was established that he knew the nature and quality of his act, but he did not
know that it was wrong.
It was held that as the defendant knew that nature and quality of his act, he was liable in
tort for assault and battery. It was immaterial that he did not know what he was doing was
wrong.
Unsoundness of mind is thus certainly not itself a ground of immunity from liability in
tort, and it is submitted that the true question in each case is whether the defendant was
possessed of the requisite state of mind for liability in the particular tort in which he is
charged.
If the plaintiffs were to sue and the defendant proved that the plaintiff
was on the wrong, that can constitute a defense.
The law was however changed by statute under the Common Law
Reforms.
It was held that the plaintiff’s bridges were swept by an act of God and
the defendant was not liable.
The critical thing is that the act done has to be reasonable. Necessity
is limited to cases involving an urgent situation or imminent peril.
Ultimately, he was released, but the gold was not returned as the
Head Constable in charge of the malkhana (wherein the said gold
was stored) had absconded with the gold. The plaintiff thereupon
brought a suit against the State of UP for damages for the loss
caused to him.
collected and prepared by
Mohamed Abdi Kadiye, Contacts:
+252613323723, Email:
mckadiye@hotmail.com
It was found by the courts below, that the concerned police
officers had failed to take the requisite care of the gold seized
from the plaintiff, as provided by the UP Police Regulations.
When the matter was taken to the Supreme Court, the court
found, on an appreciation of the relevant evidence, that the
police officers were negligent in dealing with the plaintiff’s
property and also, that they had also not complied with the
provisions of the UP Police Regulations in that behalf. In spite
of the said holding, the Supreme
Court rejected the plaintiff’s claim, on the ground that “the act
of negligence was committed by the police officers while
dealing with the property of Ralia Ram, which they had seized
in exercise of their statutory powers.
collected and prepared by
Mohamed Abdi Kadiye, Contacts:
+252613323723, Email:
mckadiye@hotmail.com
SPECIFIC TORTS
1.NEGLIGENCE
The plaintiff must prove that the defendant owed him a duty of care in
the circumstances. The circumstance must have been such that the
defendant knew or ought to have known that acting negligently would
injure the plaintiff.
Who owes another a legal duty of care?
As a general rule every person owes his neighbor a legal duty of care.
In the words of Lord Atkin in Donoghue v Stevenson (1932), a person
owes a duty of care to his neighbours. This is the so called neighbor
principal. You must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions
which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your
neighbour.
Who then in law is my neighbour?
collected and prepared by
Mohamed Abdi Kadiye, Contacts:
+252613323723, Email:
mckadiye@hotmail.com
The answer seems to be persons who are so
closely and directly affected by my acts that
I ought to reasonably have them in contention
as being so affected when am directing my
mind to the acts or omissions which are called
into question.
Whether a person owes another a duty of care
will depend on whether such a person could
reasonably have foreseen injuring the other.
These are circumstances in which a defendant does not owe a plaintiff a duty
of care. In such circumstance the plaintiff cannot sustain an action against
the defendant irrespective of negligence.
It was that she could not recover since the motorcyclist could not have
reasonably foreseen her suffering.
The plaintiff must prove that as a result of the defendant’s breach of duty he suffered loss or
damage.
The plaintiff’s loss must be traceable to the defendant’s breach of legal duty, failing which the
plaintiff’s damage is deemed to be remote and therefore irrevocable.
The defendant is reasonably liable for any loss which is reasonably foreseeable from his acts or
omissions. It was so held in The Wagon Mound II.
Question has arisen as to what losses the defendant must have foreseen and courts have taken
the view that as long as some loss is foreseeable the defendant is liable for any loss.
In Bradford v. Robinsons Rental Co. Ltd, where the plaintiff was exposed to extreme cold and
fatigued, in the course of his employment by his employers and as a consequence suffered from
frost bite,
it was held that the defendants were liable, since his suffering from frost bite was reasonably
foreseeable.
However, the defendant is not liable if the loss or damage suffered is not traceable to the
negligent act or omission of the defendant.
1. Contributory negligence
This defense is available in circumstances in which the
plaintiff is also to blame for the loss or injury. The defendant
must adduce evidence to establish the plaintiff’s contribution.
Anyone who in the course of non – natural use of his land, accumulates thereon
for his own purposes anything likely to do mischief if it escapes is answerable
for all direct damage thereby caused.
And it seems reasonable and just that the neighbor, who has
brought something on his own property which was naturally there
harmless to others so long as it is confirmed to his own property,
but which he knows to be mischievous if it gets on his neighbors
should be obliged to make good the damage which ensues if he does
not succeed in confining it to his property.
collected and prepared by
Mohamed Abdi Kadiye, Contacts:
+252613323723, Email:
mckadiye@hotmail.com
But for his act in bringing it there no mischief
could have accrued, and it seems but just that
he should at his peril keep it there so that no
mischief may accrue, or answer for the natural
and anticipated consequences and upon
authority, this we think is established to be the
law whether the things so brought be beasts,
or water, or filth, or stenches.”
The commonest instance in Law is the liability of a master for the torts of
his servants. Vicarious liability generally arises from a contract service
For a master to be liable for his servant’s torts the tort must have been committed
“in the course of employment”. An act is done in the course of employment if;
a) It was a wrongful act authorized by the master
b) It was a wrongful and unauthorized mode of doing something authorized by
the master.
Held: That the negligent act was within the course of the garage hand’s
employment although he had carried his duties in an unauthorized manner. His
master was thus vicariously liable.
Under common law lawful visitors who did not fall under
the above classifications of contractual entrants, invitees
or licensees were not clearly covered and accidents
arising from the premises and affecting such person were
commonly governed by the general law of negligence.
The Act gives some guidance in applying the common duty of care:
i. An occupier must prepared for children to be less careful than
adults; and
ii. An occupier may expect that a person in the exercise of his
calling will appreciate and guard against any special risks ordinarily
incident to it, so far as the occupier leaves him free to do so.
A) ASSAULT
This is an act of the defendant which causes the plaintiff reasonable
apprehension of the infliction of a battery on him by the defendant. It
is an act of the defendant which directly and either intentionally or
negligently causes the plaintiff immediately to apprehend a contact
with the body of the defendant .This tort protects a person from
mental anxiety.
collected and prepared by
Mohamed Abdi Kadiye, Contacts:
+252613323723, Email:
mckadiye@hotmail.com
Rules of the Tort
1. There must be some nervousness of contact
2. There must be a means of carrying out the threat by the
defendant
3. The tort is actionable per se.
4. The tort is generally associated with battery
5. Mere words without body movement do not constitute
assault.
Meaning of Force
Any physical contact with the body of the plaintiff or with his clothing is
sufficient to amount to force. There is battery where the defendant shoots
the plaintiff from a distance just as much as when he strikes him with his
fist. Mere passive obstruction is however not battery.
In the technical sense however, no physical hurt is necessary, for all forms
of trespass are actionable per se i.e. without prove of damage.
collected and prepared by
Mohamed Abdi Kadiye, Contacts:
+252613323723, Email:
mckadiye@hotmail.com
Where there is express or implied consent to contact the
plaintiff can’t sue.
See Article 160 1nd 161 Somali civil code 1973, says
A person is liable for any wrongful act against others having knowledge of
the act being wrong
Knowledge of the restraint is not necessary but may affect the quantum of
damages. In Meeting v. Graham White Aviation Co the plaintiff was being
questioned at the defendants company in connection with certain thefts
from the defendants company. He did not know of the presence of two
works police outside the room who would have prevented his leaving if
necessary.
Held; the defendant was liable for false imprisonment. Arcing L J said
“it appears to me that a person can be imprisoned without his knowing. I
think a person can be imprisoned while he is asleep or in a state of
drunkenness, while unconscious or while he is a lunatic. Of course the
damages might be diminished and would be affected by the question
whether he was conscious or not'
collected and prepared by
Mohamed Abdi Kadiye, Contacts:
+252613323723, Email:
mckadiye@hotmail.com
(b) Intention and directness
Held: It did not since the defendant has not placed a total restraint
on the plaintiff. The blocking of a part of a public highway might be
a public nuisance for which the plaintiff could bring an action in tort
if he could show special damage arising from. Provided the area of
restraint is total it does not seem to matter that it is very large.
However, it need not take place in an enclosed environment It has been observed
every confinement of a person is an imprisonment whether it be in a common
prison, private house or in the stocks or even forcibly detaining one in the public
5. The boundary of the area of confinement is fixed by the defendant. The barriers
need not be physical. A restraint affected by the assertion of authority is
sufficient.
6. The imprisonment must be direct and the plaintiff need not have been aware of
the restraint, The tort is actionable per se. The principal remedy is a monetary
award in damages.
Owners of goods are entitled to enjoy their possession and control and their
use without any interference. To protect goods the common law developed 3
torts namely;
• Detinue
• Trespass to goods
• Conversion
DETINUE
This is the unlawful detention of goods. It is the oldest tort relating to the
protection of the chattels and protects possession of goods by the owner.
The plaintiff must prove:-
i. Right to immediate possession
ii. That the defendant detained the goods after the plaintiff demanded their
return. The plaintiff is entitled to damages for the detention.
collected and prepared by
Mohamed Abdi Kadiye, Contacts:
+252613323723, Email:
mckadiye@hotmail.com
TRESPASS TO GOODS
Types/Forms of Trespass
1. Taking a chattel out of the possession of another
2. Moving a chattel
3. Contact with a chattel
4. Directing a missile to a chattel
collected and prepared by
Mohamed Abdi Kadiye, Contacts:
+252613323723, Email:
mckadiye@hotmail.com
Rules/Requirements of the Tort
1. The trespass must be direct
The plaintiff must be in possession of the chattel at the
time of interference
In Eastwood v. Holmes,
Willes J stated:
“If a man wrote that all lawyers were thieves, no
particular lawyer could sue him unless there was
something to point to the particular individual.”
collected and prepared by
Mohamed Abdi Kadiye, Contacts:
+252613323723, Email:
mckadiye@hotmail.com
DEFENCES OF DEFAMATION
UNINTENTIONAL DEFAMATION
3. Absolute Privilege
It is limited in scope.
When an occasion of qualified privilege exists, a person, provided he is not
actuated by malice is entitled to make defamatory statements about another.
Like absolute privilege, here the right freedom of speech prevails over the right
of reputation but only to a limited extent.
The statement must be made honestly and without any indirect or improper
motives. Qualified privilege is thus an intermediate case between absolute
privileges but only to a limited extent.
The statement must be made honestly and without any indirect or improper
motives. Qualified privilege is thus an intermediate case between absolute
privilege and absence of privilege.
The general principle is that the statement is protected if it is fairly made by a
person in the discharge of some public or private duty whether legal or moral
or in the conduct of his own affairs in maters where his interest is concerned.
collected and prepared by
Mohamed Abdi Kadiye, Contacts:
+252613323723, Email:
mckadiye@hotmail.com
MALICE
Contract law has many purposes but the central one is to support and control the
millions of agreements that collectively make up the market economy, and hence
operates in the context of dispute resolution mechanism.
Besides it empowers the parties to make agreements that the law will enforce. It also
enables parties to the contract to make exchanges that might otherwise carry too
great risk whether of disruption by some contingencies or default by the other party.
Accordingly, contract law in this respect is the most important which creates smooth
functioning of business transaction by creating certainty, predictability, and
enforceability.
There are still writers who suggest that the law should
enforce any agreement which was „freely made‟ between the
parties provided it has no adverse effect on others.
collected and prepared by
Mohamed Abdi Kadiye, Contacts:
+252613323723, Email:
mckadiye@hotmail.com
These “libertarians” see the individual as the
best judge of his or her own interest and
consider that what was freely agreed is by
definition, fair.
According to Art 88 Somali civil code 1973, a contract is a legally binding agreement
or relationship that exist between two or more parties and which creates rights and
obligations that may be legally enforced in the courts.
See Art 88 that says The agreement sticks as soon as both parties agree to the
declaration of their consensus while maintaining the same legal framework, to
achieve that agreement.
The difference between agreement and contract is that all lawful contracts are
enforceable in law while all agreement are social in nature and do not have the force
of law for its enforceability.
In a nutshell, all contracts involve an agreement while not all agreement leads to a
valid contract.
collected and prepared by
Mohamed Abdi Kadiye, Contacts:
+252613323723, Email:
mckadiye@hotmail.com
In contract, the parties must have a final
agreement, that is their minds must meet.
This is what is called consensus ad idem (meeting
of the mind) and must exercise their free will.
Simple Contract
Contracts which are not deeds are known as simple contracts.
They are informal contract and may be made in any way – in writing, orally
(by word of mouth), partly oral and partly written or they may be implied
from conduct.
See Art 89
Desire can be expressed in oral, written or simple directions, or it can be
shown to take unobtrusive positions that prove the purpose of the parties as
determined by specific circumstances.
This to mean that it can be either of the over said.
collected and prepared by
Mohamed Abdi Kadiye, Contacts:
+252613323723, Email:
mckadiye@hotmail.com
BILATERAL AND UNILATERAL CONTRACTS
Bilateral Contract
This is where a promise by one party is exchanged for a promise
by the other.
Unilateral Contract
This is where one party promises to do something in return for an
act of the other party as opposed to a promise.
collected and prepared by
Mohamed Abdi Kadiye, Contacts:
+252613323723, Email:
mckadiye@hotmail.com
.Unilateral Contract
This is where one party promises to do something in return for an act of the
other party as opposed to a promise.
Article 146 If the agreement is made in a leadership style, and it is met with a
stricter requirement, it is up to the Judge to modify or to waive that requirement
in compliance, in accordance with justice. There is nothing else to do otherwise
Void Contract
1. A void contract is one where the whole transaction is regarded as a nullity ab
initio (from the onset).
It means, at no time has there been a contract between the parties.
Such contracts include those which are prohibited by law or are against public
policy.
Any goods or money obtained under the agreement must be returned. Where items
have been resold to a third party, they may be recovered by the original owner.
(Article 108 generally everyone has the ability to sign into a contract .
Article 109 , a person who is inexperienced does not have the power to control
everything and his judgment is null and void.
Article 110 (1) say a minor who can distinguish, no matter what he does, and his
dealings with his property is valid if that is to his advantage in a clear way,
except if there is a loss in the obvious.)
In law who is a minor?. See Article 29 PC 2012 and Articles 44 and 45 Civil code,
(2) The threat will be based if the claimant asserts that there is a serious
risk by limiting himself or others to life or property or honor or wealth.
(3) When considering coercion, gender, age, social status, health and any
factors that may increase the degree of coercion are taken into account.
A contract may be good, but incapable of proof due to lapse of time limitation
period), laches (needless delay or neglect) even though the statute of limitations
may not have expired.
Example: Mary bought a house from Pete using a written purchase and sale
agreement. After taking possession,
Mary discovers a small leak in a pipe in the crawl space of the house, but does
not take any action against Pete for four years.
The court decided that the contract was unenforceable because of Mary’s delay,
even though the Statute of Limitations had not expired.
Executed Contract
Executed Contract means a contract that has been fully
performed by both parties. In other words, a contract whose
terms have been completely fulfilled. It could also mean a signed
contract. Once all parties sign the contract and the transaction is
closed, the contract is considered an executed contract.
In the famous case of Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. (1892) 2 QB 484 it
was strenuously argued that an offer cannot be made to the public at
large.
It was also said that the contract is made with all the world – that is, with
everybody and that you cannot contract with everybody. It is not a contract
made with all the world. There is the fallacy of the argument. It is an offer
made to all the world; and why should not an offer be made to all the world
which is to ripen into a contract with anybody who comes forward and
performs the condition? … although an offer is made to the world, the
contract is made with that limited portion of the public who come forward
and perform the condition on the faith of the advertisement.
In Payne v. Cave (1789) 3 Term Rep 148, the defendant made the
highest bid for the plaintiff’s good at an action sale, but he withdrew
his bid before the fall of the auctioneer’s hammer. It was held that the
defendant was not bound to purchase the goods. His bid amounted to
an offer which he was entitled to withdraw at anytime before the
auctioneer signified acceptance by knocking down the hammer.
Counter-Offer/Cross Offer
A counter offer is an attempt to vary the terms
of the offer
This position of the law derives it basis from the case of Foster v.
Driscoll (1921) 1 KB 470.
In this case a contract was entered into for the buying of whisky and
reselling it in the U.SA which at that time had laws against alcohol,
commonly known at the time as “prohibition”. When the shipment was
not ‘paid for, the plaintiff sued for breach of contract; It was held that
the contract could not be enforced owing to its illegal nature.
Illegal contracts involve some degree of moral wrong and an
element of crime, or fraud.
Such contracts include the following:-
i. Courts will be unprepared to enforce a contract to commit a crime
of whatever sort in return for a payment.
collected and prepared by
Mohamed Abdi Kadiye, Contacts:
+252613323723, Email:
mckadiye@hotmail.com
This is explained in the case of Dann v. Curzon (1910) 104
LT 66, the claimant had been hire to start a riot in a
theatre. When he sued for the unpaid fee of 20 pounds he
was unsuccessful. Court held that the action could not
succeed as it was an agreement to commit a crime and
against public policy.
ii. An agreement to defraud or deceive is also illegal. This
is explained in the case of Waldo v. Martin (1825).
In this case an agreement was concluded to the effect
that the plaintiff would secure a job for the defendant who
agreed to pay part of the emoluments as a secret
commission. The defendant failed to pay. Court held that
the agreement was illegal and could not be enforced.
collected and prepared by
Mohamed Abdi Kadiye, Contacts:
+252613323723, Email:
mckadiye@hotmail.com
Contracts to promote sexual immorality are not enforceable.
Civil law systems have their origin in the Roman legal tradition.
Civil systems vary widely, both in procedure and substantive law, so conducting
research on a particular nation's civil law system should include looking at that
nation's specific system of law, but they do have some trademark characteristics.
Nations with civil law systems have comprehensive, frequently updated legal
codes.
The Somali Legal system: mixed legal system of civil law, Islamic law, and
customary law (referred to as Xeer)
Definition:
This entry provides the description of a country's legal system. A statement
on judicial review of legislative acts is also included for a number of
countries.
The legal systems of nearly all countries are generally modeled upon
elements of five main types: civil law (including French law, the Napoleonic
Code, Roman law, Roman-Dutch law, and Spanish law);
The most widespread type of legal system in the world, applied in various forms in
approximately 150 countries.
Also referred to as European continental law, the civil law system is derived mainly
from the Roman Corpus Juris Civilus, (Body of Civil Law), a collection of laws and
legal interpretations compiled under the East Roman (Byzantine) Emperor Justinian I
between A.D. 528 and 565.
The major feature of civil law systems is that the laws are organized into systematic
written codes.
The civil law systems in some countries are based on more than one code.
collected and prepared by
Mohamed Abdi Kadiye, Contacts:
+252613323723, Email:
mckadiye@hotmail.com
Common Law –
A type of legal system, often identical with "English common law," which is the
system of England and Wales in the UK, and is also in force in approximately
80 countries formerly part of or influenced by the former British Empire.
Some legal scholars attribute the formation of the English common law system
to King Henry II (r.1154-1189).
Until the time of his reign, laws customary among England's various manorial
and ecclesiastical (church) jurisdictions were administered locally. Henry II
established the king's court and designated that laws were "common" to the
entire English realm.
collected and prepared by
Mohamed Abdi Kadiye, Contacts:
+252613323723, Email:
mckadiye@hotmail.com
The foundation of English common law is "legal
precedent" - referred to as stare decisis,
meaning "to stand by things decided."
Although such law systems include sanctions for law infractions, resolution
tends to be reconciliatory rather than punitive. A number of African states
practiced customary law many centuries prior to colonial influences.
The law of the international community, or the body of customary rules and treaty
rules accepted as legally binding by states in their relations with each other.
International law differs from other legal systems in that it primarily concerns
sovereign political entities.
There are three separate disciplines of international law: public international law,
which governs the relationship between provinces and international entities and
includes treaty law, law of the sea,
The term "international law" was coined by Jeremy Bentham in 1780 in his
Principles of Morals and Legislation, though laws governing relations
between states have been recognized from very early times (many
centuries B.C.).
The sources of International law are set out in Article 38-1 of the Statute
of the International Court of Justice within the UN Charter.
collected and prepared by
Mohamed Abdi Kadiye, Contacts:
+252613323723, Email:
mckadiye@hotmail.com
Islamic Law –
The most widespread type of religious law, it is the legal system enforced in over 30
countries, particularly in the Near East, but also in Central and South Asia, Africa, and
Indonesia.
In many countries Islamic law operates in cycle with a civil law system. Islamic law is
embodied in the sharia, an Arabic word meaning "the right path." Sharia covers all
aspects of public and private life and organizes them into five categories: obligatory,
recommended, permitted, disliked, and forbidden.
The primary sources of sharia law are the Qur'an, believed by Muslims to be the word of
God revealed to the Prophet Muhammad by the angel Gabriel, and the Sunnah, the
teachings of the Prophet and his works.
In addition to these two primary sources, traditional Sunni Muslims recognize the
consensus of Muhammad's companions and Islamic jurists on certain issues, called
ijmas, and various forms of reasoning, including analogy by legal scholars, referred to as
qiyas. Shia Muslims reject ijmas and qiyas as sources of sharia law.
collected and prepared by
Mohamed Abdi Kadiye, Contacts:
+252613323723, Email:
mckadiye@hotmail.com
Mixed Law –
Summary
Intellectual property law
The topic reviews the Law governing intellectual Property
Rights, identifies areas requiring reform relative to
international treaties and the proposals.
Copyright is a legal right, existing in many countries, that grants the creator of
original work exclusive rights to determine whether this original work may be
used by others.
1. Eligibility
Works eligible for copyright include literary works, musical works, artistic works,
cinematography films, gramophone records and broadcasts
For such works to become eligible for copyright, sufficient effort must have been
expended to make the work original in character and the work must have been
written down, recorded or otherwise reduced to material form with or without
consent or be a work which is intended to be used by the author as a model or
pattern to be multiplied by any industrial process
Daliil/reference,
Also, the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Muslims
must abide by their agreements, except an agreement that make Haram
(unlawful) what is Halal (lawful) or make Halal what was Haram.” (At-
Tirmidhi, Hadith No. 1272)
The protection of the moral and material interests resulting from any
scientific, literary or artistic production is now also recognized as a
‘human right’, for example, in the following international instruments.
(2) Everyone has the right to the protection of the moral and material
interests resulting from any scientific, literary or artistic production of
which he is the author’.
(e) Limitation or exceptions to exclusive rights should not conflict with a normal
exploitation of the work and not unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the
right holder;
i. Applying the trademark upon goods after they have been changed
with regard to their state, condition get-up; or packing;
ii. Where the trademark is on the goods, the alteration, part removal or
part obliteration thereof;
iii. Where the trademark is on the goods, the application of any other
trademark to the goods;
iv. Where the trademark is on the goods, the addition to the goods of
any written matter likely to injure the reputation of the trademark
collected and prepared by
Mohamed Abdi Kadiye, Contacts:
+252613323723, Email:
mckadiye@hotmail.com
Methods of registration
An application for registration in one part of the register may be treated as an application for
registration in another part.
The Registrar should state reasons for his/her decision, which is appealable to the High Court
The application for registration should be advertised normally in the Gazette and other media to
enable those opposed to it to give notice to the Registrar, which is referred to the applicant.
The final decision of the Registrar is appealable in the High Court.
After the above process the Registrar shall register the trademark either in Part A or B of the
Register and issue a Certificate of Registration.
Duration of Registration
The registration of a trademark is seven years and may be renewed
Man has been created for woman and vice versa. They are attracted to each other like
magnets. Marriage and establishing a joint life is a natural desire of human beings
responding to their instincts. It is considered one of the greatest Divine blessings.
See Art, 28 Cons 2012
In fact where else could one find a better shelter for the youth than a sincere family
unit? It is the desire of raising a family which preserves the youth from pursuing
irrational dreams and internal anxieties.
The marital union enables them to find a kind and faithful partner who could share the
hard and difficult times.
The Prophet (SA) of Islam stated: "A man who is not married, even
though he may be wealthy is surely poor and needy; and the same is
true for a woman."
collected and prepared by
Mohamed Abdi Kadiye, Contacts:
+252613323723, Email:
mckadiye@hotmail.com
Introduction The social order of every society, evolves
around several instincts and out of those two are not only
powerful rather make a lot of influence on the society: the
natural appetite or hunger and the sexual desire.
It is He who created your from a single person, and made mate of like nature in
order that he might dwell with her (in love).
Al-Quran 7:189.
collected and prepared by
Mohamed Abdi Kadiye, Contacts:
+252613323723, Email:
mckadiye@hotmail.com
Definition of nikah Literally, the word nikah means "to collect things".
The words of the hadith show that to see the woman by a man is
subject to possibility. It is he to create possible permissible
means. It is his responsibility to create such circumstances
whereby he could be successful to see the woman without any
unpleasantness.
collected and prepared by
Mohamed Abdi Kadiye, Contacts:
+252613323723, Email:
mckadiye@hotmail.com
Classes of marriage (maratib nikah)
Where a person has all such resources that are generally necessary for a
family life, such as adulthood, earning livelihood, health, having a house
to live and is certain that along with the possession of these resources if
he remains unmarried he will indulge in major sin (of commission of
Zina), then it is, fard (compulsory) for him to contract a marriage
(nikah). If he does not contract marriage (nikah) he will be sinful.
2. Obligatory (Wajib)
When all the requirements of a marital life are available, viz. a man is
adult, of sound mind, and there is no zann or yaqin of any injustice
with the wife, nikah is Sunnat.
It is necessary that in certain matters, which are next mentioned, there must be Equality
(al-Kafa'at) among the spouses (zaujayn).
The reason for the existence of such likeness is that individuals living in a like environment
become acquainted with each other within no time.
Their problems are common. There needs and difficulties are similar. If there is difference
of way of living and of the belief there is apprehension of dislike and detachment as against
love and attachment.
In such a situation the engagements of the husband are often totally different than the
wives. Requirements of a wife may be beyond the capacity of the husband. Hence, to hope
to lead a good and pure life in such a non-resembling wedlock is the most difficult thing.
This non existence of likeness even adversely affects the children born of such a wedlock.
Hence, the jurists (fuqaha) are of the view that there must exist likeness among the
spouses (zaujayn) in certain matters.
The adverse effect of such complex subsists not only on the spouses
but also on both the families throughout the marital life.
They and their families should have adopted the same profession.
This is essential for the reason that any one of the two or his or
her family may become the victim of superiority complex and
become a constant cause of torture for the other.
For example the husband is a small shopkeeper in a town while
the wife is holding a high office in a big city. This would not be
equality in social status.
According to the Ahnaf like other matters the nikah has only one essential
element that is called "Sighah", which means an offer (Ijab) and an acceptance
(Qubul). Ijab is used for such word or phrase that is expressed by the guardian
(wali) of the girl or a person acting on his behalf.
All jurists (fuqaha) agree that the offer and acceptance must
be in the same sitting or session of assembly. In case the
sitting or session had dispersed and thereafter the
acceptance occurred then such an acceptance would be void
automatically.
The acceptance must also be in the past tense.
collected and prepared by
Mohamed Abdi Kadiye, Contacts:
+252613323723, Email:
mckadiye@hotmail.com
The Maliki school also mentions five essential elements of nikah.
Those are:
(1) Wording (Sighah): These are the offer and acceptance. Their
conditions have already been mentioned above.
(2) Guardian (Wali); He is a person from the side of the female who
performs the function of offer on behalf of the female. For example, the
father of the female or any other male within prohibited degrees to her.
According to Maliki jurists (fuqaha) there can be no nikah without a
guardian (wali). Their argument is based on the hadith: "a female who
enters into a contract of Marriage (nikah) without guardian (wali) her nikah
is void,
(3) Dower (Mahr): It is also one of the essential elements of nikah in the
absence of which there cannot be nikah. However, the mention of the
dower at the time of nikah is not essential.
collected and prepared by
Mohamed Abdi Kadiye, Contacts:
+252613323723, Email:
mckadiye@hotmail.com
(4) Man: A male person who intends to marry
the female person.
2. The Minimum Dower (Mahr Adna) In this kind of dower no quantity is fixed. If man
is rich he may give piles of wealth. However many ahadith are available giving the
minimum limit of dower amount.
According to a report of Imam Bukhari the Messenger of Allah said to a person: enter
into a marriage (nikah), contract even if for a consideration of a dower of an iron
finger ring
According to a report of Imam Muslim, the dower of the wives of the Messenger of
Allah had been 12.5 Auqiyah. Abu Hurayrah reported that during the period of the
Messenger of Allah the quantity of dower fixed was 10 Auqiyah. In the modern
period the market value of ten auqiya can be known very conveniently.
Both the husband and the wife have the right to add or reduce
the settled amount or quantity of dower by mutual consent.
Where a husband intends to increase the amount agreed to by
him to be paid as dower amount, he has the right to do so.
Likewise, where a wife intends to reduce the amount payable
to him as dower amount she has the right to do so.
She has the right even to forego the whole quantity of her
dower.
The Holy Qur’an says:
(But if they, of their own good pleasure, remit any part of it to you take it and enjoy it
with right good cheer) Al-Quran 4:4
(1) When after entering into the contract of marriage (nikah) the
spouses (zaujayn) had cohabited it becomes obligatory upon the
husband to make full payment of the dower amount.
(2) (2) When after entering into contract of marriage (nikah) the
husband died. The widow shall get her dower amount before the
distribution of the estate left behind by the deceased husband.
It is not necessary that the spouses had cohabited before the death
of the husband. To distribute the estate of the deceased husband
before making payment of the dower debt to the widow is not
permissible.
Dropping of dower means the appearance of such circumstances due to which the dower
does not remain the right of the woman.
Those are five situations, namely,-
1. Repudiation of faith of Islam by the woman.
(3) Both the spouses (zaujayn) were non Muslims. The husband embraced Islam. The wife
did not do so. She shall lose her right to receive the dower
.(4) Where a guardian (wali) had contracted the marriage (nikah) of a minor or mad male
person and he on attainment of his age of puberty or becoming of sound mind person
denounces the contract of marriage (nikah).
(5) Where a guardian (wali) had contracted the marriage (nikah) of a minor or mad female
person and she on attainment of her age of puberty or becoming of sound mind person
denounces the contract of marriage (nikah
The divorce that has not concluded cannot stop the partner’s relationship of marriage
until the period of 90 days expires.
The ended divorce concludes the marriage relationship as soon as it happens, (tallaaq)
For two times the husband has the right to revoke the
pronouncement and can continue the usual marital relationship.
But when he gives the talaq exercising his third time right, then the
spouses (zaujayn) do not remain husband and wife.
The Holy Qur’an says: A divorce is permissible twice, after that the
parties should either hold together on equitable terms, or separate
with kindness, Al-Quran 2:229.
There are two significant divisions of divorce which have been further sub-
divided.
(1) With regard to its construction Kinds of Divorce (talaq) with regard to its
construction refers to it that we can judge them by the standard of Shari`ah.
(2) Talaq al-Sunnah The talaq methodology of which has been taught by the
Messenger of Allah himself.
There are two modes of pronouncing this kind of talaq, namely, talaq ahsan and
talaq hasan.
collected and prepared by
Mohamed Abdi Kadiye, Contacts:
+252613323723, Email:
mckadiye@hotmail.com
Talaq al-Bid`ah
The way of giving talaq ahsan is that when the state of menstruation of the
wife comes to an end and the husband has not cohabited with her, he may
pronounce one revocable divorce (talaq raj`i i.e. a talaq after which the
husband has the right to revoke it) and thus the period of `iddat of the
woman passes and if she was pregnant the delivery takes place.
The advantage of such divorce is that after the expiry of the `iddat period
the same man can remarry the same woman without any impediment.
(b) Talaq Hasan : This mode of giving talaq is also according to the Sunnah.
But it is of lesser rank. A talaq hasan is that a husband does not cohabit
with his wife after she is clear from her menses and gives her talaq. When
she is again clear from her next menses period he pronounces second talaq
and when she is clear from her next menses he pronounces the third talaq.
"Keep her till she is clean. Then when she again undergoes her menses and
becomes clean, then if you want you may give her talaq or to keep her.
collected and prepared by
Mohamed Abdi Kadiye, Contacts:
+252613323723, Email:
mckadiye@hotmail.com
The second kind of talaq bid`iyy is that where
the husband gives or pronounces the talaq in a
single sitting or a single sentence thrice and
ends the marital relation.
Talaq raj`i,
A talaq raj`i refers to a talaq where after giving the talaq the
husband has the right to return to the marital life as before. he
has the right to revoke the divorce pronounced by him.
3. Adoption
collected and prepared by
Mohamed Abdi Kadiye, Contacts:
+252613323723, Email:
mckadiye@hotmail.com
Succession in the Islamic perspective •
Reformation by Islamic law of Succession
1. Inheritance based on blood relationship and
marriage
Authorities on Succession
• Al-Quran- Al-Nisaa’(4) : 7,10,11,12,176
collected and prepared by
Mohamed Abdi Kadiye, Contacts:
+252613323723, Email:
mckadiye@hotmail.com
“Allah (thus) directs you as regards your children's (Inheritance): to the
male, a portion equal to that of two females: if only daughters, two or
more, their share is two-thirds of the inheritance; if only one, Her share
is a half.
For parents, a sixth share of the inheritance to each, if the deceased left
children; if no children, and the parents are the (only) heirs, the mother
has a third; if the deceased left brothers (or sisters) the mother has a
sixth.
(The distribution in all cases is) after the payment of debts. You do not
know whether your parents or your children are nearest to you in benefit.
legal heir
Estate
Condition of succession
Death, survival and Free from any impediments
Non-legal heir:
Illegitimate child –
Step child/father/mother
Adopted child/father/mother
Existing – subsistence of the marriage at the time of the decease. -Mutual rights of
inheritance between spouses cease as soon as the marriage is terminated.
Irrevocable (ba`in)- rights of inheritance cease immediately and do not persist during
the ‘iddah, with the exception of ba’in during death sickness (marad-almawt).
Forms of ba’in:- -Mutual consent (khul’) -Judicial decree (faskh) -Triple talaq
Baitulmal
According to Shafi’e, the baitulmal must be
properly administered, no corruption.
collected and prepared by
Mohamed Abdi Kadiye, Contacts:
+252613323723, Email:
mckadiye@hotmail.com
Estates
All types of properties left by the praepositus.
This includes: Property acquired by the
deceased during his lifetime via. Sale and
purchase, inheritance, Hibah, wassiyyah, etc.
• Pension
rukunrukun hibah)
• Part of the estate claimed as jointly acquired property
Settlement of debts
Debts to Allah e.g. Hajj, zakat, fidyah etc.
Debts to humans or financial institution e.g.
financial claims, loans, rent etc.
collected and prepared by
Mohamed Abdi Kadiye, Contacts:
+252613323723, Email:
mckadiye@hotmail.com
Execution of Wassiyyah
The wassiyyah must be valid Not exceeding
1/3 of estate Not in favor of legal heirs
Hadith:
Abu Imamah reported: I heard the Prophet said: “Allah has
already given to each entitled relative his proper
entitlement. Therefore, no bequest in favor of a legal heir.
collected and prepared by
Mohamed Abdi Kadiye, Contacts:
+252613323723, Email:
mckadiye@hotmail.com
Nonetheless, although the verses of bequests were
generally held to be revoked, the making of a wassiyyah is
still allowed subject to some limitations.
• In fact, it is highly recommended. “It is not right for a
Muslim who has property to leave, that he should pass two
nights without having a written will with him” (Al-Bukhari)
• “…The distribution in all cases is after the payment of
legacies and debts..” (Al-Nisa’(4): 11)
2. The 1/3 rule Hadith: Sa`ad ibn Abi Waqqas said: The Prophet
came to visit me in my sickness… I said to the Prophet, “O Prophet! I
am wealthy and my only heir is my daughter. Permit me that I make a
will of my entire property.” He said, “No”. I said, “Should I make a will
of two-thirds of my property?” He said, “No”.
I said, “Permit me for a third.” The Prophet replied, “You may make a
will of a third, although this is also too much. To leave after you your
heirs well to do is better than you leave them poor and in want whilst
others meet their needs.”
collected and prepared by
Mohamed Abdi Kadiye, Contacts:
+252613323723, Email:
mckadiye@hotmail.com
Calculation of 1/3
• Shafi`i – 1/3 x net estate at the testator’s
death.
• Maliki – 1/3 x net estate at the beneficiary’s
acceptance
• Hanafi – 1/3 x net estate at actual
distribution of property
testator’s death
• The testator revokes the wassiyyah
• The beneficiary has intentionally caused the
• Outter family,
sister(s)
Husband
1/2 • In the absence of any children with him or ex-
husband
Mother
1/6 • In the presence of any children; or • In the
presence of 2 or more brothers/sisters
(germane/cons./ uterine)
1/3 • In the absence of any children; or • In the
presence of only 1 brother or sister
collected and prepared by
Mohamed Abdi Kadiye, Contacts:
+252613323723, Email:
mckadiye@hotmail.com
The case of `Umariyyatan • Based on two
cases that were decided by Khalifah Umar r.a.
• Applicable when the surviving legal heirs
consists of only father, mother & husband/wife
of the deceased
• In such a case, the mother will take 1/3 from
residue and not 1/3 from the whole estate.
This definition takes its roots, and has remained virtually the same,
from Treasurer-General v Lippert (1883) 2 SC 172, where the full
board of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council cited with
approval De Villier’s J statement that:
‘A sale is a contract in which one person (the seller or the vendor)
promises to deliver a thing to another (the buyer or emptor), the
latter agreeing to pay a certain price
collected and prepared by
Mohamed Abdi Kadiye, Contacts:
+252613323723, Email:
mckadiye@hotmail.com
Essentials of a Contract of Sale
From the definitions set out above, it is clear
there must be agreement on certain essential
elements for a contract of sale to be valid.
Movable property
Ownership in movable property is transferred
upon delivery of the res, coupled with
either payment of the purchase price, the provision of security, or
the giving of credit. Let us now discuss (1) and (2) respectively.
collected and prepared by
Mohamed Abdi Kadiye, Contacts:
+252613323723, Email:
mckadiye@hotmail.com
The seller’s duties and the buyer’s remedies
Each party to a contract of sale is bound by those obligations which he or she has
expressly or impliedly undertaken. Apart from these obligations, the law may also
impose certain obligations on the parties to a contract of sale. These obligations
apply to any contract of sale unless the parties have expressly or impliedly
excluded them from the contract.
The seller is obliged to take care of the res vendita until the thing is made available.
Even though the buyer bears the risk of accidental loss once sale is perfecta, the
seller still has a responsibility for the thing sold. The general rule is that the seller
must take care of the res vendita from the date of completion of the sale until it is
made available to the buyer or delivery is affected.
This means that seller will be liable for any damage caused by his fraud or
negligence, but not for accidental damage caused independently of any negligence
on his/her part.
The Consignor
A consignor is the party to the contract who arranges for the transportation of the
goods
The Consignee
Sometimes there is another party to the contract of carriage known as the consignee.
The consignee is usually the person nominated by the consignor to take delivery of the
goods. The consignee is often an agent of the consignor. The same person can act as
both consignor and consignee. In this case, the consignor does not need to nominate
a separate person as a consignee.
The obligations set out below are those obligations that follow
from the nature of the contract.
These are often set out expressly in the contract or can be
implied from it.
Do not forget that there may be other express or implied
contractual obligations, which are particular to a contract, for
example, the method of packing and time and place of delivery.
The obligations of the consignor can be summarised as follows:
to deliver the goods to the carrier;
to accept delivery at destination; and
to pay the agreed or proper freight
The carrier is also bound by lasting as well as agreed obligations. The duty to
deliver at a particular destination and at a particular time would usually be
agreed upon. The main residual obligation of the carrier is to carry the goods
with due care for their safety and without due delay.
It is important to note that the first of a succession of carriers is liable for the
safe carriage in respect of the entire journey unless he limits his liability by
contract or unless he is the agent for the second and successive carriers.
The clause avoiding liability usually reads along the lines of ‘at owner’s
risk’ (for goods) and ‘at own risk’ (for passengers).
The onus lies on the carrier to prove that the clause in the agreement
excludes the specific loss in respect of which damages are being claimed.