The University of Newcastle GSBS 6060 Strategic Management

You might also like

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 18

The University of Newcastle GSBS 6060 Strategic Management

Presented by
Outline
 Company Background
 Strategic Analysis
 Strategic Objectives
 Key Current Strategies
 Strategic Implementation: General Perspective
 Key Strategic Implementation Issues
Leadership
Organisation Structure
Innovation
 Evaluation of Strategy
 Recommendations
 Conclusion
Company Background
 Dell Inc. established in 1984 by Michael Dell
 Operational regions : Americas; Europe, Middle East and
Africa (EMEA); Asia-Pacific and Japan (APJ)
 Today the number one supplier of computer systems in the
United States and second worldwide
Strategic Analysis
General • Demand shifting towards
Environment emerging markets
• Cloud computing

Specific
Environment
Strategic Analysis

Today
Strategic Objectives
Currently
 Long term value creation by driving revenue,
operating income and cash flow
Shareholders Suppliers Customers

Definitive Dominant Dominant

To succeed
Customers Employees

Definitive Dominant
Key Current Strategies
 Ansoff’s Matrix
Currently: Market Development (PC)
Penetration (Enterprise IT)
Diversification (Enterprise IT)
 Porter’s Competitive Strategy
Currently: Cost Leadership & Differentiation
 Miles & Snow’s Adaptive Strategies
1st Curve 2nd Curve
PC Enterprise solution
Prospector Analyser
Analyser
Defender/Reactor
Strategic Implementation:
General Perspective

Strategic Drift & Flux


Strategic Implementation:
General Perspective

Second Curve Activity

Enterprise IT Solution - LATE


PC

BCG Matrix: Enterprise

•PC Business – Cash Cow

•Enterprise Solution – Question Mark sh


PC Ca
Leadership
“Two-in-a-box” Management & Cost Leadership
 Leader’s Market Acumen

 Corporate Culture & Leadership Style

 Executive’s Core Competence & Organisational Needs

Leadership Style of Michael Dell & Diversification Strategy


 Radical change in Dell’s structure to flat organisation

 Dell: ‘Efficiency’ to ‘Decentralisation and Delegation’

Less directive and more supportive in leadership style


Organisational Structure
 Decentralised since inception
 Bureaucratic & Autocratic: late 1990s – mid 2000s
 Hierarchical & Structurally Bulky: mid 2000s till now
 Implications

 Strategic implementation
Innovation
 Dell less innovative

 Strategic implementation
Diversification Innovative in the three types
Evaluation of Strategy
 Strategic objective: Creating value for shareholders
 Key Strategies: Cost Leadership, Differentiation
Market Development, Penetration, Diversification
 Implementation: Leadership, Structure, Innovation

 Evaluation Criteria: (Viljoen & Dann, 2003)


Assessing Strategic Performance

(Viljoen & Dann, 2003)


Recommendations

 Less directive and more supportive in leadership –


Supporting style

 Reducing geographic division of middle


management

 Explicit strategic objectives to address and improve


employees’ motivation and skills
Conclusion

 Dell has lost its game in the global market.

 Dell shows no indication of significant change in


implementing its strategies.

 Dell stands to lose its competitive advantage in


the next 3-4 years, unless significant change is
brought about in leadership style, organisational
structure, and innovation.
Appendix
http://www.theofficialboard.com/org-chart/dell

You might also like