Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Perspective Management: - Vaibhavi A Oak
Perspective Management: - Vaibhavi A Oak
MANAGEMENT
-VAIBHAVI A OAK
2
NATURE OF
MANAGEMENT
3
ACCORDING TO PETER F.
DRUCKER, THE EMERGENCE OF
MANAGEMENT AS AN
ESSENTIAL, A DISTINCT AND
LEADING SOCIAL INSTITUTION IS
A PIVOTAL EVENT IN SOCIAL
HISTORY
4
MANAGEMENT IS AN ART
IT IS IN THE SENSE OF
POSSESSING MANAGING
SKILL BY AN INDIVIDUAL
5
ACCORDING TO RALPH C.
DAVIS, MANAGEMENT IS
THE FUNCTION OF
EXECUTIVE LEADERSHIP
EVERYWHERE
APPLICATION OF PERSPECTIVE
7
MANAGEMENT IS THE
ACTIVITY OF MAN WHO
STRUGGLES FOR BETTER
LIVING IN THE COMPLEX
AND COMPETITIVE WORLD
13
MANAGEMENT IS AN
ORGANIZED EFFORT OF
PEOPLE WHOSE PURPOSE
IS TO ACHIEVE THE
OBJECTIVES AND GOALS OF
AN ORGANIZATION
14
F.W.TAYLOR
15
ACCORDING TO F.W.TAYLOR,
MANAGEMENT IS THE ART
OF KNOWING WHAT YOU
WANT TO DO, AND THEN
SEEING THAT IT IS DONE IN
THE BEST AND THE
CHEAPEST WAY
16
HENRY FAYOL
17
ACCORDING TO HENRY
FAYOL, TO MANAGE IS TO
FORECAST AND TO PLAN, TO
ORGANIZE, TO COMMAND,
TO COORDINATE AND TO
CONTROL
MANAGEMENT IS: 18
OPTIMUM UTILIZATION OF
AVAILABLE RESOURCES
IN ORDER TO ATTAIN
CERTAIN PRE-SET
GOALS/OBJECTIVES
19
OPTIMUM UTILIZATION
MEANS:
BEST POSSIBLE
UTILIZATION UNDER
GIVEN CIRCUMSTANCES
MANAGEMENT AS A “PROCESS” 20
MANAGEMENT AS
“COORDINATION”
DONALLY, GIBSON AND
IVANCEVICH
ALSO SUPPORT THE VIEW OF
MANAGEMENT AS A PROCESS
BUT THEIR STRESS IN MORE ON
CO-ORDINATION.
25
MANAGEMENT AS A “FUNCTION”
DUNN, STEPHENS AND KELLY SAY
THAT: “MANAGEMENT IS A ROLE
WHICH INCLUDES A SET OF DUTIES,
RESPONSIBILITIES, AND
RELATIONSHIPS-INVOLVED IN WORK
ORGANIZATIONS”.
THESE DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
CONSTITUTE THE FUNCTION A
MANAGER PERFORMS
26
MANAGEMENT IS GETTING
THINGS DONE THROUGH
OTHER PEOPLE.
EFFICIENT MANAGEMENT IS
THE LIFEBOAT OF ANY
DEVELOPED BUSINESS
THERE ARE FIVE M’S IN THE 27
COMPETITIVE EDGE:
•THE PROPER METHOD WILL
ENSURE REQUIRED QUALITY,
QUANTITY AND IN-TIME
DELIVERY
•IT WILL ENSURE THE
ACCOMPLISHMENT OF
MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES
33
MANAGEMENT IS AN
ESSENTIAL ACTIVITY OF
ALL ORGANIZATIONAL
LEVELS
LOWER, MIDDLE AND
UPPER LEVEL
34
MUST BE
S-M-A-R-T
--------------------------------
SPECIFIC:
WE SHOULD BE SPECIFIC IN OUR
GOAL.
HOWEVER, THE GOALS 39
MUST BE
S-M-A-R-T
--------------------------------
MEASURABLE:
THE GOAL MUST BE MEASURABLE.
E.G., I WANT TO SECURE 95%
MARKS.
HOWEVER, THE GOALS MUST 40
BE
S-M-A-R-T
--------------------------------
ACHIEVABLE
OUR RESOURCES ARE LIMITED. WE
NEED TO PLAN AROUND THE
AVAILABLE ONES & MAKE THEM
ACHIEVABLE. PRACTICALITY PLAYS A
VERY IMPORTANT ROLE.
HOWEVER, THE GOALS 41
MUST BE
S-M-A-R-T :
--------------------------------
REALISTIC:
THE GOAL MUST BE REALISTIC.
HOWEVER, THE GOALS 42
MUST BE
S-M-A-R-T
--------------------------------
TIME BOUND:
YOUR GOAL SHOULD HAVE A TIME
LIMIT .
43
IMPORTANCE OF MANAGEMENT:
IMPORTANCE OF MANAGEMENT:
•RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT
•SOUND ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
•MANAGEMENT DIRECTS THE
ORGANIZATION
•IT INTEGRATES VARIOUS INTERESTS
45
IMPORTANCE OF MANAGEMENT:
•IT STABILIZES THE FLUCTUATIONS
•IT INNOVATES
•COORDINATION AND TEAM SPIRIT
•TACKLING AND SOLVING PROBLEMS
•MANAGEMENT IS A TOOL FOR
PERSONALITY DEVELOPMENT
HISTORY OF MANAGEMENT
47
INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION:
DURING THE SPAN OF 100 YEARS
FROM YEAR 1750 TO 1850,
SCIENTISTS’ PERFORMANCE WAS
SIGNIFICANT. THEY CREATED NEW
TECHNIQUES. NEW MACHINE AGE
STARTED
51
HENRI FAYOL
HENRI FAYOL CLASSIFIED ALL THE 55
A MANAGER AS FOLLOWS:
F.W.TAYLOR
64
MANAGEMENT:
A. SCIENCE-NOT RULE OF THUMB
• Replacement of old method by doing
work scientifically
• Fair work to each worker
• Standardization in work
• Differential piece rate of payment system
PERSPECTIVE OF SCIENTIFIC
71
MANAGEMENT:
MANAGEMENT:
C. COOPERATION BETWEEN
MANAGEMENT AND WORKERS
AND VICE VERSA
D. MAXIMUM OUTPUT
• by division of work
• by assumption of responsibility
jointly by management and workers
PERSPECTIVE OF SCIENTIFIC
MANAGEMENT: 73
E. IMPROVEMENT OF WORKERS
• Scientific selection of workers:
finding out physical, educational and
psychological requirements of each
job and find suitable persons for each
job
• Workers are provided with job
training.
74
Peter F.Drucker
75
CONTRIBUTIONS OF PETER
F.DRUCKER:
NATURE OF MANAGEMENT:
•NO BUREAUCRATIC MANAGEMENT
•EMPHASIZED MANAGEMENT WITH
CREATIVE AND INNOVATIVE
CHARACTERISTICS
CONTRIBUTIONS OF PETER F. DRUCKER: 77
CONTRIBUTIONS OF PETER
F.DRUCKER:
A MANAGER HAS TO DETERMINE THE
OBJECTIVES AND ACTIVITIES, AND IS
CONCERNED WITH THE DIRECTION
AND CONTROLLING OF THE
ACTIVITIES, TO MAKE CONTRIBUTIONS
FOR THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND
MISSION OF THE INSTITUTION
WHETHER BUSINESS, HOSPITAL OR
UNIVERSITY.
CONTRIBUTIONS OF PETER 79
F.DRUCKER:
ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE:
AN EFFECTIVE ORGANIZATION
STRUCTURE IS FRAMED IN SUCH A
WAY THAT IT ENABLES SMOOTH
PERFORMANCE. IT CONTAINS
MINIMUM NUMBER OF MANAGERIAL
LEVELS. IT PROVIDES A CHANCE TO
TEST THE ABILITY OF YOUNG PEOPLE
WHO ARE ACCEPTING THE
RESPONSIBILITY.
CONTRIBUTIONS OF PETER 80
F.DRUCKER:
CENTRALIZED CONTROL WITH A
STRUCTURE OF
DECENTRALIZATION:
SIMILAR TO THE FEDERAL STRUCTURE OF
GOVERNMENT, THE TOP MANAGEMENT HAS
MORE POWERS THAN VARIOUS
DEPARTMENTS. BUT THE DECISIONS
REGARDING THE DEPARTMENTS HAVE TO
BE TAKEN BY BOTH OF THEM.
DEPARTMENTS ARE ALLOWED TO TAKE
DECISIONS WITHIN THE LIMITS SET UP BY
CONTRIBUTIONS OF PETER
F.DRUCKER: 81
F.DRUCKER:
•DRUCKER VISUALIZED RAPID CHANGES IN SOCIETY
DUE TO RAPID TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT.
•HEREALIZED IMPACT OF SUCH CHANGES ON
HUMAN LIFE. HE STRESSED THAT HUMAN BEINGS
SHOULD DEVELOP AN ATTITUDE TO FACE THE
CHANGES BY DEVELOPING DYNAMIC
ORGANIZATIONS, BY ABSORBING RAPID CHANGES.
83
Mary Parker Follett
IT CREATES COMMITMENT,
MOTIVATION AND THE DRIVE
FOR INITIATING THE MISSION,
OBJECTIVES, PROJECTS AND
TASKS NECESSARY TO REALIZE
THE VISION.
94
IT SHOULD BE UNDERSTOOD
THAT VISION IS A
PORTRAYAL OF WHAT LIFE
COULD BE FIVE TO TEN
YEARS FROM NOW.
VISION IS THE RESULT OF DREAMS
IN ACTION.
95
VISION STATEMENT:
•INVOLVE AS MANY EMPLOYEES
AS POSSIBLE IN THE
FORMULATION OF VISION
STATEMENT.
•AFFINITY DIAGRAM AND
BRAINSTORMING SHOULD BE
USED IN THE FORMULATION OF
GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR A
VISION STATEMENT:
98
Enthusiastic Unique
VISION STATEMENT OF TATA MOTORS LIMITED
100
STATEMENTS:
OBJECTIVES:
EVERY DEPARTMENT SHOULD HAVE WELL DEFINED
OBJECTIVES.
THIS WILL BE BASED ON WHY THE DEPARTMENT EXISTS
AND WHAT ARE ITS BROAD EXPECTED OUTCOMES.
GOAL SETTING: 107
ACTION PLANS:
DETAILED ACTION PLANS HAVE
TO BE LAID DOWN NEXT.
THIS WILL ASSIST INDIVIDUALS IN
ACHIEVING THE TARGETS.
process to achieve the targets.
111
VISION
MISSION STATEMENTS
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3
CONTROLLING DIRECTING
MOTIVATING COORDINATING
7 Process of
Scientific
Management
113
PLANNING
•PLANNING IS THE PRIMARY
FUNCTION OF MANAGEMENT.
•PLANNING REFERS TO DECIDING
IN ADVANCE WHAT WILL BE
DONE IN NEAR FUTURE.
114
ORGANIZING
•IT
CAN BE DEFINED AS ARRANGING
THE WORK, PROCESSES, AUTHORITY,
RESOURCES AND EMPLOYEES IN RIGHT
ORDER, SO THAT ALL THE
ORGANIZATIONAL ACTIVITIES CAN
TAKE PLACE IN A DEFINED AND
ORDERLY MANNER.
116
STAFFING:
•STAFFINGIS THE IMPORTANT FUNCTION OF
MANAGEMENT THAT INVOLVES EMPLOYING THE
RIGHT NUMBER OF PEOPLE AT THE RIGHT PLACE
WITH RIGHT SKILLS AND ABILITIES.
•ITALSO INVOLVES TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT
OF THE PEOPLE SO THAT ORGANIZATIONAL
OBJECTIVES AND GOALS CAN BE ACHIEVED
SUCCESSFULLY.
118
•DIRECTIONINCLUDES GUIDANCE,
SUPERVISION, AND MOTIVATION OF
EMPLOYEES.
•DIRECTINGINVOLVES INFLUENCING,
ENCOURAGING, COUNSELING, MENTORING,
AND GUIDING THE EMPLOYEES TO WORK
TOWARDS THE ACCOMPLISHMENT OF
ORGANIZATIONAL OBJECTIVES AND GOALS.
120
• COMMUNICATION AND
COORDINATION
• ARE THE TWO IMPORTANT ELEMENTS.
COMMUNICATION REFERS TO VERBAL
OR NON-VERBAL INTERACTION
BETWEEN THE MANAGERS AND
SUBORDINATES.
• ON THE OTHER HAND, COORDINATION
IS DEFINED AS AN ACT OF ENABLING
DIFFERENT INDIVIDUALS TO WORK
TOGETHER FOR A COMMON GOAL.
121
TERM.
• THE DURATION OF LONG TERM CAN
BE ONLY ONE YEAR IN CASE OF
BANKING WHEREAS IN CASE OF A
LARGE MANUFACTURING PLANT
SUCH AS STEEL PLANT SHORT TERM
ITSELF COULD BE OF TWO YEARS.
128
ADVANTAGES OF PLANNING
What's Quality?
Quality refers to a parameter which decides the
superiority or inferiority of a product or service. Quality
can be defined as an attribute which differentiates a product
or service from its competitors. Quality plays an essential
role in every business. Business marketers need to
emphasize on quality of their brands over quantity to
survive the cut throat competition.
Why would a customer come to you if your competitor is
also offering the same product? The difference has to be
there in quality. Your brand needs to be superior for it to
stand apart from the rest.
Total Quality management is defined as a continuous effort
by the management as well as employees of a particular
organization to ensure long term customer loyalty and
customer satisfaction. Remember, one happy and satisfied
customer brings ten new customers along with him whereas one
disappointed individual will spread bad word of mouth and
spoil several of your existing as well as potential customers.
You need to give something extra to your customers to expect
loyalty in return. Quality can be measured in terms of
durability, reliability, usage and so on. TQM is a structured
effort by employees to continuously improve the quality of
their products and services through proper feedbacks and
research. Ensuring superior quality of a product or service is
not the responsibility of a single member.
Every individual who receives his/her paycheck from the
organization has to contribute equally to design foolproof
processes and systems which would eventually ensure superior
quality of products and services.
TQM indeed a joint effort of management, staff members,
workforce, suppliers in order to meet and exceed customer
satisfaction level. You can’t just blame one person for not adhering
to quality measures. The responsibility lies on the shoulder of
everyone who is even remotely associated with the organization.
W. Edwards Deming, Joseph M. Juran, and Armand V.
Feigenbaum jointly developed the concept of total quality
management. Total Quality management originated in the
manufacturing sector, but can be applied to almost all
organizations.
Total quality management ensures that every single employee
is working towards the improvement of work culture,
processes, services, systems and so on to ensure long term
success.
PDCA Approach
MANAGERS LEADERS
Administer Innovate
Maintain Develop
Control Inspire
Initiate Originate
Informal leadership
Arises when a person without formal authority is
influential in directing the behavious of others. Although
not formally appointed or elected he becomes a leader
through his actions or personal attractions.
Leadership/Managerial Styles
No style is better, or worse...
No one style of leadership fits all situations, so it helps to have an
understanding of other styles.
By learning about the pros and cons of each style, you can adapt your
approach to your situation
10 Types of Leaders
1. Transactional leadership.
2. Autocratic leadership.
3. Bureaucratic leadership.
4. Charismatic leadership.
5. Democratic/participative leadership.
6. Laissez-faire leadership.
7. Task-oriented leadership.
8. People/relations-oriented leadership.
9. Servant leadership.
10. Transformational leadership
Transactional Leadership
Transactional Leadership style starts with the idea that team
members agree to obey their leader when they accept a job.
The "transaction" usually involves the organization paying
team members in return for their effort and compliance. The
leader has a right to "punish" team members if their work
doesn't meet an appropriate standard.
The Transactional Leader
Pros & Cons
Transactional leadership offers some benefits.
1. This leadership style clarifies everyone's roles and responsibilities.
2. People who are ambitious or who are motivated by external rewards –
including compensation – often thrive.
The Transactional Leader
Pros & Cons
The downside of this leadership style is that team members can
do little to improve their job satisfaction. It can feel stifling,
and it can lead to high staff turnover.
Transactional leadership is really a type of management, not a
true leadership style, because the focus is on short-term tasks.
It has serious limitations for knowledge-based or creative
work. However, it can be effective in other situations.
Autocratic Leadership
Autocratic Leadership is an extreme form of leadership, where leaders have
complete power over their people.
Staff and team members have very room to make suggestions, even if those
suggestions would be in the best interest of the group.
Autocratic Leadership
Pros & Cons
The benefits of the autocratic leadership style is that it is best used in crisis.
It can be an efficient and effective tool when quick decisions are needed, and
work needs to get done.
Autocratic Leadership
Pros & Cons
The downside to this form of leadership is that people may resent being
treated this way.
Consistently using this style may lead to a loss of team members, and high
turn over. It is best used to accomplish routine tasks. In those instances,
the advantages may outweigh the disadvantages.
Bureaucratic Leadership
Bureaucratic leaders work "by the book." They follow rules rigorously, and
ensure that their people follow procedures precisely.
The downside of this leadership style is that it's ineffective in teams and
organizations that rely on flexibility, creativity, or innovation.
Charismatic Leadership
Charismatic leadership style can resemble transformational leadership
because these leaders inspire enthusiasm in their teams and are energetic in
motivating others to move forward.
Examples of Charismatic
Leadership
1. A leader who believes more in him/herself than in the team
3. This type of leader considers the success of the team as being contingent on
the leaders presence.
Charismatic Leadership
A charismatic leader might believe that he/she can do no wrong, even when
others are warning them about the path they are on.
They encourage creativity, and team members are often highly engaged in
projects and decisions.
Democratic/Participative
Leadership
There are many benefits of democratic leadership. Team members tend to have
high job satisfaction and are productive because they're more involved in
decisions. This style also helps develop people's skills.
Because participation takes time, this approach can slow decision-making, but
the result is often good. The approach can be most suitable when working
as a team is essential, and when quality is more important than efficiency
or productivity.
Democratic/Participative
Leadership
The downside of democratic leadership is that it can often hinder situations
where speed or efficiency is essential. For instance, during a crisis, a team
can waste valuable time gathering people's input. Another downside is that
some team members might not have the knowledge or expertise to provide
high quality input.
Laissez-Faire Leadership
This leadership style can be effective if the leader monitors performance and
gives feedback to team members regularly. It is most likely to be effective
when individual team members are experienced, skilled, self-starters.
The downside is that it can be damaging if team members don't manage their
time well or if they don't have the knowledge, skills, or motivation to do
their work effectively.
Task-Oriented Leadership
Task-oriented leaders focus only on getting the job done and can be autocratic.
They actively define the work and the roles required, put structures in
place, and plan, organize, and monitor work. These leaders also perform
other key tasks, such as creating and maintaining standards for
performance.
Task-Oriented Leadership
The benefit of task-oriented leadership is that it ensures that deadlines are met,
and it's especially useful for team members who don't manage their time
well.
However, because task-oriented leaders don't tend to think much about their
team's well-being, this approach can suffer many of the flaws of autocratic
leadership, including causing motivation and retention problems.
People-Oriented/Relations-Oriented
Leadership
With people-oriented leadership, leaders are totally focused on organizing,
supporting, and developing the people on their teams.
Leadership
People-oriented leaders treat everyone on the team equally.
However, servant leaders often "lead from behind," preferring to stay out of
the limelight and letting their team accept recognition for their hard work
Servant Leadership
Although you can use servant leadership in many situations, it's often most
practical in politics, or in positions where leaders are elected to serve a
team, committee, organization, community, or ministry.
Transformational Leadership
Transformational leaders are inspiring because they expect the best from
everyone on their team as well as themselves. This leads to high
productivity and engagement from everyone in their team.
As the "vision caster" the leader inspires others to manifest the vision.
Final Thoughts...
1. Leadership skills can be learned, even for those who don't consider
themselves to be "born leaders"
2. You are already a leader, because there are people within your circle of co-
workers, friends, and family, that you influence by your actions/words
3. Understanding your personality will help you perfect your default
leadership style
Level 5 Leadership
Level5 leadership is a concept developed in the
book Good to Great.
Level 5 leaders display a powerful mixture of
personal humility and indomitable will. They're
incredibly ambitious, but their ambition is first and
foremost for the cause, for the organization and its
purpose, not themselves.
Who exactly is a Level 5 leader?
Collins describes Level 5 leader as Humility + Will = Level 5.
They are the nurturing leaders who do not want credit but
want success to sustain over a longer period of time, long after
they are gone.
Level 5 leaders are modest, shy and fearless and possess
the capability to transform an organization from good to
great without portraying themselves as wizards with magic
wands. They prefer talking about the company and the
contribution of other people but rarely about their role or
achievements.
What is Personal Humility?
Humility is the personal honesty that you, as the
leader, do not know everything and do not have all
the answers. ... It is certainly not a coincidence that in
Good to Great, Jim Collins identifies the
characteristics of the best leaders as possessing: A
paradoxical blend of personal humility and
professional will.
Personal Humility Professional Will
Demonstrates a compelling modest, Creates superb results, a clear
shunning public adulation, catalyst in transformation from
good to great.
Acts with quiet, calm
determination, relies principally on Demonstrates an unwavering
inspired standards, not inspiring resolve to do whatever must be
charisma, to motivate. done to produce the best long term
results, no matter how difficult.
Channels ambition into the
company not the self, sets up more Sets the standard of building an
successors for even more greatness enduring great company, will settle
in the next generation. for nothing less.
Look into the mirror not the Look out of the window , not in the
window, to apportion mirror, to apportion credit for the
responsibility for poor results, success of the company – to other
never blaming other people, people, external factors & good luck.
external factors or bad luck.
The Level 5 leadership clearly reestablishes the facts about a simply living and
high thinking with an emphasis on personal humility taught by the older
generations. The financial breakthroughs achieved by level 5 leaders prove that
these characteristics can achieve tangible results as well.
The most important example in this context can be cited of great world leaders
like M.K. Gandhi and Abraham Lincoln, who always put their vision ahead of
their egos. They came across as shy and defenseless people in their mannerism
and speech but were hardly so when it came to actions.
The other example from the business leaders who fitted perfectly into this
category was Darwin E Smith who was the CEO of the paper company
Kimberly-Clark and turned it around to become the biggest consumer paper
product company. He was a unique mix of personal humility and will;
combined with risk taking ability which made him a role model for the
business leaders of today.
Certain actions performed by Level 5 leaders which separate them
from the rest of the leaders and senior executives
The first step if their ability to identify and include right people
with them towards achieving goals. Unlike the traditional method of
building strategies and then looking for the right people to carry
them out, they take a different route. It’s about getting the right
people on board and then deciding on the destination.
They also do not shy away from facing and accepting brutal
truths and realities of data, numbers and situations but at the same
time they do not lose hope of a better future.
They also strive towards aligning consistent efforts towards a
goal, rather than giving one massive push they believe in small but
firm pushes to bring in the momentum.
Certain actions performed by Level 5 leaders which separate them
from the rest of the leaders and senior executives
Then he started systematic rebuilding of the executive team and board. He made sure that family
relation is no more a shortcut to higher position in the company. He made it very clear that any
executive in the company must be the best in the whole industry, within a span of responsibility. He
fired every executive who was not upto the standard. This sort of ruthlessness can be expected only
from an outsider who joined as the CEO. But Cain was an insider for 18 years. He was a member of
family that previously ran Abbott laboratories. In the end, even the family was happy as the
company performed 4.5 times the general market between 1974 and 2000. Blue chip companies like
Merck and Pfizer performed only twice the general market in this period.
Ex 2 - Ken Iverson
In the 1970s and 1980s American steel firms faced a lot of problems due to cheap
imports coming from Japan and other countries. The CEO of Bethlehem steel put
the blame on imports for poor performance of the company. In contrast, Ken
Iverson (Iverson) the CEO of Nucor saw it as a blessing. He said that domestic steel
companies have a huge advantage compared to the imported steel which have to be
shipped all the way across the ocean, which involves huge cost. Iverson even spoke
against the protection given to domestic steel industry.
The root of all the problems facing the domestic steel companies according to
Iverson was management's inability to change. He felt that the domestic companies
were not doing well because they failed to adapt the changing technology. This is
the difference between Ken Iverson, a level 5 leader according to whom
incompetence in management was the reason for the poor performance of steel
plants in the USA while according to others cheap imports was to be blamed.
Ex 3 The Secret of Wells Fargo
Wells Fargo showed remarkable performance over a period of 15 years starting from 1983. But
according to Jim Collins, the foundation for this exceptional performance was laid way back in
early 1970s. It was then when Cooley ventured on a mission to build the best talented management
team in the banking industry. Cooley was sure of impending radical change in the banking
industry. But he did not have any exact idea as to how the change is going to be. To adjust to this
change he along with Ernie Arbuckle, Chairman of Wells Fargo went on talent hunt.
They recruited talented people in the industry whenever and wherever they found them, even when
they had no specific job for them. Cooley explains the rationality of his approach:
"That's how you build the future. If I'm not smart enough to see the changes that are coming, they
will. And they'll be flexible enough to deal with them." Nobody in the industry succeeded in
predicting the change. But no company in the banking industry adapted itself to the change as well
as Wells Fargo did. When the sector performed 59% below the general stock market, Wells Fargo
performed three times the general stock market.
Strategic
Management
What is Strategic Management?
Strategic decisions are long-term decisions. Administrative decisions are taken daily. Operational decisions are not frequently taken.
These are considered where The future planning is These are short-term based Decisions. These are medium-period based decisions.
concerned.
Strategic decisions are taken in Accordance with These are taken according to strategic and operational These are taken in accordance with strategic and
organizational mission and vision. Decisions. administrative decision.
These are related to overall Counter planning of all These are related to working of employees in an These are related to production.
Organization. Organization.
These deal with organizational Growth. These are in welfare of employees working in an These are related to production and factory growth.
organization.
Role of strategists
Strategists are individuals or groups who are primarily involved in the formulation,
implementation, and evaluation of strategy. In a limited sense, all managers are
strategists. There are persons outside the organization who are also involved in
various aspects of strategic management. They too are referred to as strategists. We
can identify nine strategists who, as individuals or in groups, are concerned with and
play a role in strategic management.
1. Consultants
2. Entrepreneurs
3. Board of Directors
4. Chief Executive Officer
5. Senior management
6. Corporate planning staff
7. Strategic business unit (SBU) level executives
8. Middle level managers
9. Executive Assistant
1. Consultants: Many organizations which do not have a corporate
planning department owing to reasons like small size, infrequent
requirements, financial constraints, and so on, take the help of external
consult-ants in strategic management. Besides the Indian consultancy
firms, such as, A.F.Ferguson, S.B. Billimoria and several others, now
there are many foreign consultancy firms. They offer a variety of
services.
McKinsey and Company, specializes in offering consultancy in the
areas of fundamental change management and strategic visioning;
Andreson Consulting, is in business restructuring and info tech and
systems; Boston Consulting helps in building competitive advantage;
and KPMG Peat Marwick is in strategic financial management and
feasibility studies for strategy implementation.
2. Entrepreneurs are promoters who conceive the idea of starting a business enterprise
for getting maximum returns on their investment. They are waiting for an
environment change and thereby for an opportunity to exploit the situation in their
best interest. Thus they start playing their role right from the promotion of the
proposed venture. So, their strategic role to make the venture a success is very
conspicuous in a new business enterprise. Therefore, it is expected of an entrepreneur
that he should posses foresight, sense of responsibility, desire to work hard and
dashing spirit to bear any future contingencies. According to Drucker, “the
entrepreneur always searches for change, responds to it and exploits it as an
opportunity”. Here is an example of a successful women entrepreneur.
Kiran Mazumdar Shaw, a young entrepreneur, set up an export-oriented unit
manufacturing a range of enzymes. As an expert in brewing technology, Mazumdur
entered the field of biotechnology after experiencing problems in getting a job. Later
she set up another plant for manufacturing two new enzymes created by her own
research and development (R&D) department. As managing director, Mazumdar was
actively involved in all aspects of policy formulation and implementation for her
companies
3. Board of Directors are professionals elected on the Board
of Di-rectors (BOD) by the shareholders of the company as
per rules and regulations of the Companies Act. They are
responsible for the general administration of the organization.
They are supposed to guide the top management in framing
business strategies for accomplishing predetermined
objectives. It is also the responsibility of the Board to review
and evaluate organizational performance whether it is as per
the strategy laid down or not. The Board is also empowered
to make appointments of senior executives. In this
connection, it should be noted that the success of strategies
much depends on the relative strength in terms of power held
by the Board and the Chief Executive (CE).
4. Chief Executive Officer: In the management circle, the chief executive is
the top man, next to the directors of the Board. He occupies the most
sensitive post, being held responsible for all aspects of strategic
management right from formulation to evaluation of strategy. He is
designated in some companies as the managing director, executive director
or as a general manager. Whatever the designation be, he is considered the
most important strategist being responsible to play major role in strategic
decision-making.
5. Senior Management: Starting from the chief executive to the level of
functional or profitcentre heads, these managers are involved in various
aspects of strategic management. Some of the members of the senior
management act as directors on the board usually on a rotational basis. All
of them serve on different top-level committees set up by the board to look
after matters of strategic importance and other policy issues. Executive
committees, consisting of senior managers, are responsible for
implementing strategies and plans, and for a periodic evaluation of
performance.
Strategic planning at MRF Ltd. used senior management expertise by
dividing them into five groups dealing with products and markets,
environment, technology, resources, and manpower. Each group had a
leader who helped to prepare position papers for presentation to the board.
The executive directors in the company were actively involved in SWOT
analysis through the help of managers and assistant managers.
6. SBU level executives: “SBU” stands for strategic business unit.
Under this approach, the main business unit is divided into
different independent units and is allowed to form their own respective
strategies. In fact, the business is diversified and thus the departmental
heads are supposed to act as the main strategist, keeping an eye on
optimum benefit for their departments. Hence strategists i.e., the
departmental heads enjoy the maximum amount of authority and
responsibility within their strategic business units.
At Shriram Fibres, the strategic planning system covered the different
businesses ranging from nylon yarn manufacture to the provision of
financial services. Strategic plans were formulated at the level of each
SBU as well as at the corporate level. The corporate planning
department at the head office coordinated the strategic planning
exercise at the SBU-level. Each SBU had its own strategic planning
cell.
7. Corporate-planning staff plays a supporting role in
strategic management. It assists the management in all
aspects of strategy formulation, implementation and
evaluation. Besides this, they are responsible for the
preparation and communication of strategic plans, and for
conducting special studies and research pertaining to
strategic management.
It is important to note that the corporate planning
department is not responsible for strategic management and
usually does not initiate the process on its own. By
providing administrative support, it fulfills its functions of
assisting the introduction, working, and maintenance of the
strategic management system.
8. Middle level managers: They are basically operational
planners they may, at best, be involved as ‘sounding boards’
for departmental plans, as implementers of the decisions
taken above, followers of policy guidelines, and passive
receivers of communication about functional strategic plans.
As they are basically involved in the implementation of
functional strategies, the middle-level mangers are rarely
employed for any other purpose in strategic management.
9. Executive Assistant: An executive assistant is a person
who assists the chief executive in the performance of his
duties in various ways. These could be : to assist the chief
executive in data collection & analysis, suggesting
alternative where decisions are required, preparing various
proposals, projects & reports, helping in public relations &,
liaison functions, coordinating activities with the internal
staff & outsiders & acting as a filter for information coming
from different sources.
Benefits of Strategic
Management
There are many benefits of strategic management and they include
identification, prioritization, and exploration of opportunities. For
instance, newer products, newer markets, and newer forays into
business lines are only possible if firms indulge in strategic planning.
Next, strategic management allows firms to take an objective view of
the activities being done by it and do a cost benefit analysis as to
whether the firm is profitable.
Just to differentiate, by this, we do not mean the financial benefits
alone but also the assessment of profitability that has to do with
evaluating whether the business is strategically aligned to its goals and
priorities.
The key point to be noted here is that strategic management allows a
firm to orient itself to its market and consumers and ensure that it is
actualizing the right strategy.
Financial Benefits
It has been shown in many studies that firms that engage in strategic
management are more profitable and successful than those that do not
have the benefit of strategic planning and strategic management.
When firms engage in forward looking planning and careful evaluation
of their priorities, they have control over the future, which is necessary
in the fast changing business landscape of the 21st century.
It has been estimated that more than 100,000 businesses fail in the US
every year and most of these failures are to do with a lack of strategic
focus and strategic direction. Further, high performing firms tend to
make more informed decisions because they have considered both the
short term and long-term consequences and hence, have oriented their
strategies accordingly. In contrast, firms that do not engage themselves
in meaningful strategic planning are often bogged down by internal
problems and lack of focus that leads to failure.
Non-Financial Benefits
Economic aspects. Companies need to maintain strong economic interests so they can stay in business.
Being profitable and providing value to shareholders is part of a company being socially responsible.
Legal aspects. A company must follow the law and have a legal obligation to do so. For example, car
companies are required to meet a certain level of emissions standards in car production.
Ethical aspects. Acting ethically means going above and beyond the legal requirements and meeting the
expectations of society. In a recent example, Apple Inc. policies were questioned when it was discovered
the high suicide rate of workers producing iPhones in the Chinese Foxxconn factory. As a result of the
newfound awareness, Foxxconn raised the salary for workers from 900 yuan ($143) to 1,800 yuan. In
other words, the ethical expectations (and outrage) of society can encourage companies to act ethically.
Philanthropic aspects. This is the expectation that companies should give back to society in the form of
charitable donations of time, money, and goods. Some organizations, donate certain % of profit and
thousands of hours to nonprofit community groups each year.
Based on these areas, many believe business should go above and beyond the law
to act ethically, meet expectations of society, and even go beyond by donating profit
back to the communities in which the businesses operate.
As we mentioned at the start of this section, businesses are not the only ones who
engage in social responsibility.
Since people run businesses, often we see business social responsibility initiatives
that are directly related to individuals in the organization.
For example, the Body Shop founder, Anita Roddick,Lyall, S. (2007, September
12). Anita Roddick, founder of the Body Shop, dies at 64, cared deeply for the
environment and for animals, and as a result, her organization (now owned by
L’Oreal) focused on environmentally friendly products and products that did not test
on animals. This is an example of how social responsibility in organizations can be
a direct result of the individual’s care and concern.
Individual SR
Lego
Lego will invest $150 million over the next 15 years with a focus on
addressing climate change and reducing waste. It has reduced their
packaging as well as investing in an alternative energy source and plans to
source 100% renewable energy by 2020. To accomplish this the company
will hire a team to support its commitment to using sustainable materials
and plans to reach a 90% recycling rate.
TOMS
TOMS mission is to donate a pair of shoes for every pair they sell and has
resulted in the donation of over 60 million pairs of shoes to children in
need. Profits are used to assist the visually-impaired by providing
prescription glasses and medical treatments, provide'safe' drinking water
and build businesses in developing countries to create jobs. They are also
strong anti-bullying advocates and work with several non-governmental
organizations and nonprofits to set examples of ethical behavior.
Few Examples @ India
Tata Group
The Tata Group conglomerate in India carries out various CSR
projects, most of which are community improvement and poverty
alleviation programs. Through self-help groups, it has engaged in
women empowerment activities, income generation, rural community
development, and other social welfare programs. In the field of
education, the Tata Group provides scholarships and endowments for
numerous institutions.
The group also engages in healthcare projects, such as the facilitation
of child education, immunization, and creation of awareness of AIDS.
Other areas include economic empowerment through agriculture
programs, environment protection, providing sports scholarships, and
infrastructure development, such as hospitals, research centers,
educational institutions, sports academy, and cultural centers.
Mahindra & Mahindra
Indian automobile manufacturer Mahindra & Mahindra
(M&M) established the K. C. Mahindra Education Trust in
1954, followed by Mahindra Foundation in 1969 with the
purpose of promoting education. The company primarily
focuses on education programs to assist economically and
socially disadvantaged communities.
Its CSR programs invest in scholarships and grants, livelihood
training, healthcare for remote areas, water conservation, and
disaster relief programs. M&M runs programs such as Nanhi
Kali focusing on education for girls, Mahindra Pride Schools
for industrial training, and Lifeline Express for healthcare
services in remote areas.
Ethics