Expected Retaliation From Existing Bottlers/concentrate Manufacturer (Reducing The Price of Bottle/concentrate)

You might also like

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

New Entry

- Setting up Concentrate manufacturing process costs little capital, but high investment - Challenge with respect to building synergy with stakeholder such as bottlers, concentrate
required in bottling setups: High manufacturer and retailers: Medium
- costs for advertising, promotion, market research, and bottler support borne by - international operations encountered several obstacles, including antitrust regulation, foreign
concentrate manufacturer and bottlers: Medium exchange controls: Low
- Initial investment in trademarks: High - Expected retaliation from existing bottlers/concentrate manufacturer (reducing the price of
bottle/concentrate)

Power of Suppliers
- Fast-food restaurants, contributing to fountain sales:
High Industry Competitions Power of Customers
- Sugar and syrup providers, main ingredient for colas:
Medium - 3 Players captured 88% market share in US: High - Non-cola CSDs included lemon/lime, citrus, pepper-
- concentrate producers with their prices to bottlers: High - Declining liquid consumption in US past 2 years: High type, orange, root beer, and other flavors (can play
- Bottlers, since they control DSD delivery: High - Declining CSDs market share: High pepsi or coke against other vendors )- Buyers have
- shelf space charges by walmart and other retailers: - Using its Distribution prowess Pepsi and Coca Cola so many options can switch easily: High
Medium outstripped competing brands even in new portfolio - Growing healthy drinks’ demand : High
- The rapid growth of the mass-merchandisers, led by (H20): ?
Wal-Mart posed new threat to profitability for Coke, - overseas markets enabled Coke and Pepsi to
- Rivalry in acquiring the international market between pepsi
Pepsi, and their bottlers: Low & coke : High broaden the scope of innovation: High
- Concentrates have exclusive rights to newer markets:
- Ad campaign competition: High - Coke World war 2 feat; Pepsi Great depression
Low
- Bottlers have the opportunity to produce non-cola - Capturing bottler business: Low market capture: Low
drinks: Medium - Market strategy of Pepsi was based on pricing: Medium - Pepsi targeting family customers
- Coke developing automatic fountain dispenser;
introduce vending machine: Low
Substitutes

- CSD industry size is reduced in US due to change in consumer preference: High - experiment with new cola and non-cola flavors; with packaging options: Medium
- Non-cola CSDs included lemon/lime, citrus, pepper-type, orange, root beer, and other - Switching cost is very low: Medium
flavors (more health conscious consumers could move towards these): Medium - Regional demands and potentials: Medium
- Local competition in international market: Medium
- Private label bottled water are cheaper alternatives: Low
Temp Slide
New entrants in an industry bring enter the market with the desire to gain market
share. Businesses can lose their market share in such scenarios. The severity of
the threat depends on the entry barriers in that market.

Threat of Substitutes
- CSD industry size is reduced in US due to change in consumer preference
- Non-cola CSDs included lemon/lime, citrus, pepper-type, orange, root beer, and other flavors (more health conscious consumers could move towards these)
- Local competition in international market
- experiment with new cola and non-cola flavors; with packaging options
- Switching cost is very low
- Regional demands and potentials, like jal jeera, nimbu paani etc

New Entry

- Setting up Concentrate manufacturing process costs little capital, but high investment - Challenge with respect to building synergy with stakeholder such as bottlers, concentrate
required in bottling setups manufacturer and retailers
- costs for advertising, promotion, market research, and bottler support borne by - international operations encountered several obstacles, including antitrust regulation,
concentrate manufacturer and bottlers foreign exchange controls
- Initial investment in trademarks - Expected retaliation from existing bottlers/concentrate manufacturer (reducing the price of
bottle/concentrate)
Factors affecting Soft Drink industry profitability

Factors Tending to Increase in Profitability Factors Tending to Decrease in Profitability

1. Introduction of more Non-cola CSDs could leverage 1. Local competition in international market
increase market share in this segment and try to 2. Study revealing CSD drinks causes obesity or
capture more health conscious customers injurious to health
2. Pepsi & coke brought back bottlers business under 3. The rapid growth of the mass-merchandisers, led
their control by Wal-Mart posed new threat to profitability for
3. overseas markets enabled Coke and Pepsi to
Coke, Pepsi, and their bottlers
broaden the scope of innovation
4. Strong synergy among existing stakeholders 4. Doesn’t have expertise to cater to local regional
( concentrate producers, bottlers, retailer and taste in emerging markets (like Jalzeera in India
suppliers) 5. CSD industry size is reduced in US due to
5. Coke developing automatic fountain dispenser; change in consumer preference
6. “Soda Tax” on sugary drinks
introduce vending machine
7. international operations encountered several
obstacles, including antitrust regulation, foreign
exchange controls
8. Environmentalists against Use PET for water
bottles
Industry Profit Pools - CSD Industry

You might also like