Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Procedure and Specifications FOR: Wind Load Analysis
Procedure and Specifications FOR: Wind Load Analysis
Procedure and Specifications FOR: Wind Load Analysis
FOR
WIND LOAD ANALYSIS
The first step is the determination of the Tributary Area using your
Longitudinal and Transversal Framing Plans.
Note:
Consider the two adjacent bays that will produce the maximum tributary areas.
The parapet (if you have) should also be considered in the computation of the
tributary areas.
A. COMPUTATION FOR THE
TRIBUTARY AREA
Sample:
A. COMPUTATION FOR THE
TRIBUTARY AREA
Sample:
A. COMPUTATION FOR THE
TRIBUTARY AREA
LONGITUDINAL TRANSVERSAL
SECTION SECTION
A = 7.0m x 3.0m A = 4.5m x 3.0m
ROOF LEVEL
A = 21.00m2 A = 13.50m2
A = 7.0m x 4.0m A = 4.5m x 4.000m
THIRD FLOOR
A = 28.00m2 A = 18.00m2
A = 7.0m x 4.0m A = 4.5m x 4.000m
SECOND FLOOR
A = 28.00m2 A = 18.00m2
B. COMPUTATION FOR VELOCITY
PRESSURE (qh):
NSCP 2010, Vol. 1, 6th Ed., Section 207.5.10, (2-15)
V - Basic Wind Speed NSCP 2010, Vol. 1, 6th Ed., Table 207 – 1
The second step is the V = 200 kph Zone 2
computation of the Velocity Iw - Importance Factor NSCP 2010, Vol. 1, 6th Ed.,
Section 207.5.6 Table 207 – 3
Pressure. Iw = 1.15
Special Occupancy Category
Exposure Category
Note: Exposure C
NSCP 2010, Vol. 1, 6th Ed., Section 207.5.6.3
After determining the values of each variable, substitute them to equation for the
Velocity Pressure.
Each floor level has their own Velocity Pressure and varies due to their tributary areas.
Sample:
Note: The values vary depending upon the nature and details of your building.
C. COMPUTATION FOR WINDWARD
AND LEEWARD PRESSURES (P):
Sample:
ROOF LEVEL P = qh (GCpf – GCpi) P
SECOND FLOOR F = PA F
SECOND FLOOR F = PA F
DEFINITION
It is based on the assumption that, for each
Portal method is also known as Approximate storey of the frame, the interior columns will
Analysis Method. take twice as much shear force as the exterior
columns.
It is one of the common approximate methods in the
analysis of statically indeterminate structures. In this paper, portal method analysis was done
This method is used to analyse the frames which but was not used in the design proper for
subjected to lateral loadings such as wind, conservative reasons.
earthquake, and blast loadings.
It is an appropriate analysis of indeterminate
frames
ASSUMPTIONS
1. 2. 3.
An inflection An inflection The horizontal shear is divided among all the
point is located at point is located at columns on the basis that each interior column takes
mid-height of each the centre of twice as much as exterior column.
column each beam
SAMPLE COMPUTATIONS
1000
3200
20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11
3200
4000
3200
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
4000
A B C D E F G H I J Isolating Joint 21
σ 𝐹ℎ = 0
Isolating Joint 21 𝑅ℎ = 6.00 −0.50
σ 𝐹ℎ =0 𝑹𝒉 = 𝟓.𝟓𝟎𝒌𝑵
𝑅ℎ =6.00−0.50
𝑹𝒉 =𝟓.𝟓𝟎𝒌𝑵 σ 𝑀21 = 0
𝑅𝑣 ሺ2.75ሻ= 0.50(2.00)
σ 𝑀21 =0 𝑹𝒗 =𝟎.𝟑𝟔𝒌𝑵
𝑅𝑣ሺ2.75ሻ=0.50(2.00)
𝑹𝒗 =𝟎.𝟑𝟔𝒌𝑵 𝑀21−20 = 0.50∗ 2.00
𝑴𝟐𝟏−𝟐𝟎 = 𝟏.𝟎𝟎𝒌𝑵−𝒎 = 𝑴𝟐𝟏−𝟐𝟐
𝑀21−20 =0.50∗2.00
𝑴𝟐𝟏−𝟐𝟎 =𝟏.𝟎𝟎𝒌𝑵−𝒎 = 𝑴𝟐𝟏−𝟐𝟐
B. FACTOR METHOD
DEFINITION
The Factor Method is more accurate than either the portal method or the
cantilever method.
The portal method and cantilever method depend on assumed location of
hinges and column shears whereas the factor method is based on
assumptions regarding the elastic action of the structure.
VARIABLES
A. STIFFNESS FACTOR, K
where:
where:
E. COLUMN MOMENT
𝐶𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑛 𝑀𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡 =𝐶𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑛 𝑀𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝐹𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟 × 𝑆𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑦 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡
VARIABLES
F. GIRDER MOMENT FACTOR
To get the value of the Column Moment Factor the girder factor
is added to the half of the value of the opposite end of the girder
and multiplied to the relative stiffness of the girder.
G. JOINT CONSTANT
VARIABLES
H. GIRDER MOMENT