Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 21

Buffett Bid for Media Gen

Newspaper
Rajiv Bhutani
IIM Raipur
2018
Buffett’s Bid for MEG Newspapers
Learning Objectives
• DCF Valuation: This case analyzes a declining industry where firms
shrink: Reduction in NWC become a source of cash
• Finance & Business Strategy: Link between finance & Strategy –
Firm might transition to new distribution channel and production
format, thereby generating different CF, TV and growth rates
• Financial Distress: Financing Challenges & its costs for highly
leveraged firms on edge of default and role played by people like
Buffett
• Comprehensive Review: Valuation Analysis, Optimal Capital
Structure, Bank Lending, Bond and Option Pricing, risk
management (hedging)
Questions to Analyze
• Why Buffett want to purchase this? How will he
make money?
• Is MEG's newspaper division worth $ 142 mm –
Value using DCF: Steps include calculating
WACC, FCF, TV and NPV
• Value Credit Agreement
• What are the Options before the CEO?
• What Happened and what lessons can be learnt
Buffett’s Motivation – Financial
• Penny Warrants: 4.65 MM MEG shares worth
19.9% of company. Gain of 4.65*(4.18-0.01) =
19.4 MM
• More upside possible
• Providing liquidity to a struggling firm
• 400 MM loan at 11.5% discount, so MEG
receives 354 MM for this
Buffett’s Motivation – Qualitative
• News generation will never disappear entirely
• Proverbial Fourth pillar of democracy
• Buffett says: “There are still a lots of things newspapers can do
better than any other media”
• Demand for local newspapers covering local news
• He owns other newspapers viz Washington Post, Buffalo News,
Omaha World Herald – So, he understands the dynamics
• Everyone betting against the industry – Be Fearful when others
are greedy, and be greedy when others are fearful
• Maybe he is buying an undervalued asset
Buffett – How will he make money?
• Deal could be about Credit Agreement – “Feat of Financial
Engineering”
• He could be buying at Fire-Sale prices – He is buying at 4X EBITDA
(142 MM offer/34.2 MM EBITDA in 2012)
• He has left large pension obligations
• Maybe be he expects actual circulation and expected cash flows
will be better than expected
• He also gets real estate which will provide a floor price (value) to
the transaction
• He might be able to change the business by focusing on digital
strategy – He saw a fundamental flaw in strategy in which digital
copy was free but hard copy costed money
Buffett – How will he make money?
• Devil’s Advocate:
• Circulation is declining rapidly even in Buffett’s
newspapers
• Median public newspaper is losing money with many
bankruptcies
• Newspapers assets have been losing value rapidly –
Philadelphia Enquirer and Philadelphia News went
from 515 MM in 2006 to 55MM in 2010
• It has outmoded distribution strategy and high costs
Value the Asset Agreement
• What exactly is Buffett buying, what is he not
buying?
• Answering will help us find appropriate
comparable firms and an appropriate asset
beta
Value the Asset Agreement
• Points to Note:
– Valuing an asset not equity. So, don’t subtract Debt from NPV
– Projections in Exhibit 10 include Tampa Tribune’s cash flows but Buffett is not
buying them
– So, must subtract $ 30 MM from NPV
– Deal will close in mid-2012: how to handle half-yearly cash flows and half-
yearly discounting
– We assume that deal closes in January 1
– How should MEG value losses on the sale of newspaper division (assuming BV
> 142 MM offer)
– Not enough information but loss on sale will have limited value since MEG
took large asset impairments in 2008/09
– Also because, MEG CEO said firm will not pay taxes for foreseeable future,
given accumulated operating losses
Value the Asset Agreement – WACC

• Lets Compute WACC


• Select Comparables
• Exhibit 12 gives details about 6 firms, their
business description, leverage and equity beta
• Gannett Revenues of 5.2 Bn Vs 300 MM for
MEG
• Can we simply use information for leverage
and asset beta for MEG??
Value the Asset Agreement – WACC
• Using MV leverage ratio, equity beta, and an
assumed debt beta of 0.2, lets compute asset beta
for the comparable firms
• Average for Belo and Gannett is 1.41
• 2 methods to calculate WACC = 11.07%
• Round off to 11.1%
• Sensitivity Analysis for WACC as a function of
assumed leverage ratio and asset beta
• Ranges from 10-12%
Value the Asset Agreement – FCFs
• Two Important Questions:
– Who prepared these forecasts?
– Why they prepared them?
• In this Case:
• Analyst, not the seller and were done for valuation purposes
- to price MEG's equity in sum-of-parts method
• So, forecasts are probably less biased (less optimistic) than if
they came from MEG
• However, since these are from an outsider, they might have
limited information and thus be less accurate compared to
MEG's forecasts
Value the Asset Agreement – FCFs
• Questions about the Forecasts:
• Revenues fall initially, but begin to grow in later
years…….Why??
• Industry is declining – Are local papers truly different
from urban papers?
• Also, circulation has been falling
• Maybe, with online subscription based model, forecasts
seem reasonable
• Aim: See relationship between business strategy,
operations and financials
Value the Asset Agreement – FCFs
• Operating Margins increase from 4.9% to 10%
• Historically, margins were around 11%
• Economics of online publishing might improve
over-time, which would lead to fewer PPE
costs
• Fuel costs, newsprint, distribution all will
decline
• CapEx has been cut drastically to 16.3 MM
Value the Asset Agreement – TV
• What is reasonable TV growth rate assumption?
• TV = FCF*(1+g)/(WACC-g) = (19.2*(1+g))/(11.1%-g)
• Now compute NPV
• Reverse-Engineer: What TV growth is needed to justify 142
MM valuation? -0.8%
• So, if long term growth is > -0.8%, Buffett will make money
• Sensitivity Analysis
– TV growth is much less important here compared to other cases
like case of high growth firms
– Base case: TV = 55% of firm’s value (94.9 MM out of 172.7 MM)
Value the Asset Agreement – Credit

• 45 MM revolving Credit facility


• Term loan of 400 MM
• Penny warrants
• Board Seat
Value the Asset Agreement – Credit
• If Term loan is priced correctly at 10.5%, it has a value of 46 MM ( 400-354)
• Is 10.5% right risk-adjusted value on this loan?
• Remember: Loan will be made to a restructured MEG
• Bond Rating for 10yr corporate bonds. Currently CCC+ is at 10.26%
• Buffett is getting 10.5% (this has 5 MM value)
• Does it make sense to use CCC+ since it reflects risk of a diversified company
with newspapers?
• Also, loan has 8yr maturity, bonds have 10yr maturity
• There is some slope between 8 and 10 yr
• So, 46 MM from loan and 19 MM from warrants = 65 MM from credit
• So, Buffett is actually paying 142 – 65 = 77 MM for newspapers
• Reverse Engineering ---> g of -23%
• Desperate seller Vs Liquidity provider
Should MEG Accept?
• It rallied 33% on day of announcement
• Credit agreement is very expensive
• Might not be able to repay Buffett
Should MEG Accept? - Alternatives
• Find Another Buyer: Time and still will need to refinance the
loan
• Sell other Assets
• Restructure Existing Loans: Existing creditors just
renegotiated loan few months ago
• Sign a New Loan: Time limit and Adverse Selection
• Sell Equity: Co will have to sell 75 mm shares
• Restructure Operations: Takes time. Co has already laid off
40% people, cut dividends/Capex
• Declare Bankruptcy: Might be only option if Buffett offer fails
What Happened?
• Deal happened!!

You might also like