Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Seminar PPT Sulthana
Seminar PPT Sulthana
Seminar PPT Sulthana
1
CONTENTS
Introduction
Cable-Stayed Bridge
Disadvantages of cable-stayed bridge
Box Girder Bridge
Disadvantages of box girder bridge
Extradosed Bridge
General Structural Consideration
2
Contd…
Construction
Advantages
Types
Conclusion
Reference
3
INTRODUCTION
Structure that combines main elements of
Prestressed box girder bridge and Cable-Stayed
bridge.
Resembles similar to Cable-Stayed Bridge.
Difference lies in tower height and depth of girder.
Bridge was introduced by J MATHIVAT in 1988.
4
CABLE-STAYED BRIDGE
It has one or more tower (or pylons).
From which cables support the bridge deck.
Distinctive feature are stays, which run directly
from tower to deck.
Normally forming a fan-like pattern or a series
of parallel lines.
5
DISADVANTAGES OF CABLE-STAYED BRIDGE
6
BOX GIRDE BRIDGE
Main beams comprise girder in the shape
of a hollow box.
Box is rectangular or trapezoidal in cross-
section.
Box Girder normally comprises either prestressed
concrete, structural steel, or a composite of
steel and reinforced concrete.
7
DISADVANTAGES OF BOX GIRDER BRIDGE
8
Contd…
9
EXTRADOSED BRIDGE
Concept is relatively new in field of structural
and Bridge engineering.
Attractive structural type around the world.
Its becomes unique type of structure for its
advantages over other bridges.
Due to good results obtained, first bridge constructed
in JAPAN(1994).
Historical context describes its origin,influence of
principal structural elements.
10
Contd…
Basic structural concept is Cables anchored
with Box Girder increase the compressive
force of girder.
Allows Box Girder to carry a huge load by work
together with a very long span and lower
tower height.
An Extradosed Bridge uses much shorter stay-
tower than cable-stayed bridge.
Significantly shallow deck structure than used
on the girder bridge.
11
Contd…
Many of the construction costs of both cable-
stayed and box girder types, extradosed bridges
can deliver material savings to offset much of
this penalty.
Material cost of bridge is inversely proportional
to cable distance when height of pylon is kept
constant.
12
Contd..
Figure3:Extradosed Bridges
13
GENERAL STRUCTURAL
CONSIDERATION
STAY CABLE
Stay configuration - Single plane/Double plane.
Stay layout – Fan shaped/Semi fan shaped/Harp
shaped
CENTRAL SUPPORTED SUPERSTRUCTURE
Single cell with internal strut.
Single cell spine Box Girder with external strut.
Single cell spine Box Girder with internal struts along
with external struts.
14
Contd…
15
Contd…
16
CONSTRUCTION
Working part on the bending of girder and part on
the cable suspension of deck.
Optimum design depends upon number of
parameters.
During problem formulation, most of the practical
design variables are considered.
Form is mostly suited to medium-length spans
between 100m to 250m.
17
Contd…
19
ADVANTAGES
20
Contd…
21
Contd…
Nearly 30% lesser than Girder Bridge.
Less load on foundation.
Saving in foundation.
22
TYPES
1. SINGLE PLANE OF STAY-SEMI-FAN SHAPED
23
Contd…
24
2. DOUBLE PLANE OF STAYS – SEMI FAN SHAPED
25
Contd…
26
3. DOUBLE PLANE OF STAYS- SEMI- FAN- SHAPED
27
Contd…
29
Contd…
30
5. Double Plane of Stays-Semi-Fan Shaped
31
Contd…
32
CONCLUSION
It can be adopted alternative to Cable- Stayed
Bridge , when overall height is restricted.
Lower tower height not only reduces material
consumed but also reduces construction difficulty.
From aesthetic consideration , Extradosed
Bridges creative yet more economically
affordable designs compared to Cable- Stayed
Bridge.
33
Contd…
More competitive under similar span length
owing to lower construction cost.
Better constructability and easier maintenance.
Best suited for spans more than 100m.
Previous studies identified 120 Extradosed Bridge
in use.
State’s first Extradosed Bridge is being constructed
at Beypore.
34
REFERENCE
Fathy SAAD “ Structural Optimization of Extradosed
Bridges “ Associate Professor Ain Shams university,
Cairo, Egypt.
L. M. C. Simoes, J. H. J. O. Negrao “Optimization of
Cable- Stayed Bridges with box-girder decks “
Elsevier Science Ltd, 2000.
IRC- 112- 2011 (CODE OF PRACTISE FOR CONCRETE
ROAD BRIDGES).
35
THANK YOU
36