Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction Seismic Methods - Refraction Seismic
Introduction Seismic Methods - Refraction Seismic
- Refraction Seismic
COURSE CONTENT:
• Introduction
• Seismic Waves
• Refraction Seismic
• Time-Distance Plot
• Seismic and Rocks Properties
Denser fluids thus have lower velocity than lighter fluids. Gases
follow the same formula.
a) Young modulus E
b) Bulk modulus K
d) Axial modulus
16
Compressional Wave (P-Wave) Animation
17
Shear Wave (S-Wave) Animation
18
Rayleigh wave
Direction of propagation
19
Rayleigh Wave (R-Wave) Animation
20
Seismic waves in a solid:
The detailed analysis, done very well for example in Telford et al.,
shows that there exists a compressional wave with particle motion
in the direction of wave propagation and also a shear wave with
particle motion in the plane perpendicular to the direction of
propagation.
The velocities of these waves are given in terms of the bulk and
shear module, K ,μ and density, ρ, viz.:
Why the shear modulus is involved in the P-wave velocity is not intuitively
obvious. The above derivation for the wave motion in a fluid is based on the
fact that the bulk modulus K relates the volumetric strain to a hydrostatic
pressure field.
Although not depicted in the cross section the volume element is deformed
equally in each coordinate direction – the moving pressure field does not
change the shape of the element.
In a solid the pressure disturbance is not hydrostatic and the shape of the
element changes under deformation. It is the difference in deformation in
different directions that brings the shear modulus into play in the resulting
equations of motion.
Water waves are familiar and are readily seen as having a much lower
velocity than a sound wave propagating through the bulk of the medium.
The velocity of a Rayleigh wave, VR, is tied to the S-wave velocity and
Poisson’s ratio (and hence to VP) through the solution to the following
equation (White, 1983).
Since it is observed that velocity generally increases with depth, Rayleigh waves
of high frequency penetrate to shallow depth and have low velocity whereas
Rayleigh waves of low frequency penetrate to greater depth and have high
velocity.
For a typical surface source of Rayleigh waves the initiating disturbance has a
broad frequency spectrum so the observed surface motion at some distance from
the source is spread out in time, with low frequencies coming first and high
frequencies coming later.
Measured Rayleigh wave dispersion can be used to invert for the vertical velocity
profile.
Love waves require a distinct shear component in the source stress field
so they are not a strong component of the disturbance propagated from
the explosive or surface impact sources used in seismic exploration.
They can be, and are, generated by special horizontal shear sources.
For many shallow earthquakes they may be the dominant surface wave.
t1 2t1
Rays are useful for describing what happens to waves when they pass
through an interface and we will use them later to describe reflecting and
refracting waves in layered media.
In the movie the amplitude of the wavelet is contoured and color-coded.
The high amplitude values are in red and the low amplitude in blue in this
plot.
The zero of the wavelet is the color of the undistorted background half-
space.
The time traces of geophones located in a well in the right hand side of
the section are shown in the graph on the right of the figure.
The second wave front at 2t1 in the above cartoon is twice as far
from the source as the first and so the amplitude of the wavelet is
reduced by half. This is called the geometric attenuation and it is
separate from any other attenuation due to loss mechanisms in the
medium.
The smaller the contrast in acoustic impedance across the rock interface the
greater is the portion of energy transmitted through the interface.
Snell´s Law:
Sin θ1 = Sin θ1’
, and Sin θ1/ V1 = Sin θ2 /V2
Nov 8, 2020 Introd.Seismic - Refraction Seis 40
Figure shows: Geometry of
rays associated with a P-
wave (shown as ray)
incident obliquely on a
plane interface, and
converted vertically
polarized S-waves (SV;
shown as ray). Vp and Vs
are the respective P-and
S-wave velocities. Suffixes
1 and 2 depict the layer
number.²
movie.avi
Sources that generate seismic energy by impacting the surface of the Earth
(most common type employed). Although impact sources can be rather
sophisticated in their construction, but most commonly used is a simple
sledgehammer.
In this case, an operator does nothing more than swing the sledgehammer
downward onto the ground. Instead of striking the ground directly, it is
most common to strike a metal plate lying on the ground.
Like impact sources, gun sources generate seismic energy by transferring the
kinetic energy of a moving object into seismic energy. In this case, the
moving object is a bullet or shot-gun slug. Some sources use blanks instead
of bullets or slugs. In this case, energy is transferred from the column of air
in the gun's barrel that is set in motion by the blank to the ground.
Most gun sources are more compact than the source shown to the left. Like the
sledgehammer, gun sources must also be connected to the recording system
so that you can begin recording ground motion from the geophones at the
instant the slug or shell hits the ground.
Explosive sources can impart a large amount of seismic energy into the ground
given their relatively small size.
These sources can vary in size and type from small blasting caps to larger, two-
phase explosives.
Figure shows:
Field geophone
D
B
A
E
Half-space
Nov 8, 2020 model - Refraction Seis
Introd.Seismic 64
Plotting the arrival times of the first arrival First Arrivals
versus offset produces the travel-time curve The times of arrival of the first wave to be recorded
shown below:
at each offset. When performing an exploration
refraction experiment, this is the only information
extracted from the recorded seismograms that is used.
Before proceeding: time is increasing downward in
reflection methods. For refraction observations it is
more common time increasing upward.
For a simple layer (a half-space model), the travel-
time curve associated with the first arrivals is given
by two, straight-line segments. At small offsets
(green) corresponds to the direct arrival. At larger
offsets
(red) corresponds to that of the refracted arrival.
The two segments are clearly distinguished from
each other by a change in slope at some critical offset
commonly called the cross-over distance. This
distance represents the offset beyond which the direct
Nov 8, 2020
arrival is no longer the first arrival recorded. 65
Introd.Seismic - Refraction Seis
Introd.Seismic - Refraction Seis
We must determine the time instant at which
ground motion was initiated on each seismogram.
On the seismogram shown to the right, this time
corresponds to the time indicated by the red line.
If, however, there is any type of noise recorded on the seismogram preceding the
time of arrival of the first arrival, this time can be very difficult to pick. In practice,
one should consider this choice of first arrival times to be part of the interpretational
process rather than part of the data collecting process.
Often, geophysicists will not attempt to pick the first arrival time but will rather
pick the time of the first prominent peak following the first arrival as shown by the
blue line.
This will bias your results by a small amount, but the effect of the bias is minimal
compared to the effect of picking first arrival times inconsistently from trace to
trace.
Nov 8, 2020 Introd.Seismic - Refraction Seis 66
Travel-Time Curves:
For this simple model under consideration, we can compute what the arrival times
of the various seismic waves should be and overlay these predicted arrival times on
top of our shot record.
As expected, the first arrival at short offsets is the direct arrival. This arrival has a
very large amplitude and its moveout is constant over all offsets. That is, its arrival
times fall along a straight line when plotted versus offset.
At larger offsets (>275 m), the first arrival is the refracted arrival. This arrival is
characterized by small amplitudes and a constant moveout that is smaller in value
than the moveout of the direct arrival. That is, the slope of the line connecting the
arrival times of the refracted arrival is smaller (the line is flatter) than the direct
arrival. The last arrival recorded at all offsets is the reflected arrival.
Plots of the times of arrivals of the various recorded waves versus offset from
the source are called travel-time curves. We will often show the travel-time curves
of seismic arrivals without overlaying them on shot records as shown below:
Example:
v1 = 1500 m/s
v2 = 4000 m/s
z = 100m
( x = 10, 50, 100, 300!!) meter
reflection
refraction
Ti
direct
Figure shows: Travel-time
curves for reflected,
refracted and direct waves.
Nov 8, 2020
x
Introd.Seismic - Refraction Seis
k xc 71
Figure shows: Principle of refraction seismic.
At large offsets, we will observe the head wave off of the top of
the half space (B2) as the first arrival. This arrival propagates
horizontally along the Earth's surface at a speed equal to that of
the halfspace.
• The equations for computing the depths are given below. D1 is the
depth to the first interface and D2 is the depth to the second interface.
• The boundary between the layer and the half space dips
from left to right. Notice that in this example, the source is
to the left (up dip) of the receivers.
Raypaths for the head wave observed at four different offsets are
shown in red in the figure below.
Thus, the times that it takes the head wave to travel from the
source back up to the black dashed line are identical to the
times we've discussed for flat boundaries.
• Dividing this distance by the velocity, V1, gives us the extra travel
time. An equation for this extra time is shown in the figure above.
• The travel times observed from this dipping layer are shown below,
along with the times that would be observed if geophones were placed
along the black dashed line (the flat layer equivalent).
•We would not be able to tell the layer was dipping from the shape of
the travel-time curve. In both the dipping and non-dipping layer case, the
curve consists of two linear segments,
•We could compute the velocity of the layer from the slope of the
travel-time curve that defines the direct arrival,
•When using the slope of the travel-time curve for the head wave, we
would compute a velocity for the halfspace that is too small, and
•Using the velocity calculated above and the zero offset time, t0, we
would compute a depth to the layer boundary larger than the distance to
the interface beneath the source, hs.
Now what happens if we place the source down dip, to the right, and the
receivers up dip? The geometry and the ray paths (red) for the head
wave
Nov 8,observed
2020 at four different offsets
Introd.Seismic are shown
- Refraction Seis in the figure below. 93
As we did when shooting down dip, we can examine how
the dip affects the observed travel times by comparing
them to the times we would observe along a line passing
through the source and paralleling the boundary (dashed
line).
Thus, the travel times at any offset for the head wave
observed on the surface of the Earth are less than those we
would observe for an equivalent flat layer.
The time deficit increases with increasing offset and has the
same size as the time increase at a given offset when
shooting down dip.
• We would not be able to tell the layer was dipping from the shape of
the travel-time curve. In both the dipping and non-dipping layer cases,
the curve consists of two linear segments. Thus, we would most like
misinterpret the observations as being indicative of a simple flat-lying
interface,
• We could compute the velocity of the layer from the slope of the
travel-time curve that defines the direct arrival,
• When using the slope of the travel-time curve for the head wave, we
would compute a velocity for the halfspace that is too large, and
• Using the velocity calculated above and the zero offset time, t0, we
would compute a depth to the layer boundary smaller than the distance
to the interface beneath the source, hr.
where,
P is the hydrostatic pressure (Pa);
ρ is the liquid density (kg/m3);
g is gravitional acceleration (m/s2);
h is the height of liquid above (m);
Pa is the atmospheric pressure (Pa).
Of course I remembered Suganth Kannan, in fact I was impressed with his presentation and the innovative mathematical model
for earthquake prediction using a spatial connection theory. I told my students his valuable story and some were really inspired
by him.
I am totally agreed with you that I it would be interesting to see the results of his model recalibrated to 6.0-8.0 magnitude
challenging quakes. I even wish that Suganth Kannan can extend his prediction area of study for potential seismic activities. Of
course that will take time, efforts and facilities, but I wish him a great success.