Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 32

Topic 6: Highway Material and

Construction: Mix Design—Part


One
CSE29357
Highway Engineering
Dr. Yuhong Wang
Professor
Fall 2020

1
Contents
 Overview of Highway Construction Materials
 Characterization of Soils
 Characterization and Design of Bituminous
Mixture
 Aggregate
 Binder
 Mixture Design
 Highway Construction Videos

2
Mixture Design

3
Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Mix Designs
 Objective:
 Develop an economical blend of aggregates and
asphalt that meet design requirements
 Mix design methods
 Marshall
 Hveem
 Superpave

4
Requirements in Common
 Sufficient asphalt to ensure a durable pavement
 Sufficient stability under traffic loads
 Sufficient air voids
 Upper limit to prevent excessive environmental
damage
 Lower limit to allow room for initial densification due
to traffic
 Sufficient workability

5
Marshall Mix Design
 Developed by Bruce Marshall for the
Mississippi Highway Department in the late
30’s
 Waterway Experiment Station (WES) began to
study it in 1943 for WWII
 Evaluated compaction effort
• No. of blows, foot design, etc.
• Decided on 10 lb. Hammer, 50 blows/side
• 4% voids after traffic

6
Automatic Marshall Hammer

7
Marshall Mix Design
 Select and test aggregate
 Select and test asphalt cement
 Develop trial blends at different asphalt
contents
 Heat and mix asphalt cement and aggregates
 Compact specimen (100 mm diameter) using
Marshall hammer
 Conduct Marshall tests and determine the
optimum asphalt content

8
Marshall Test Key Information
 Theoretical maximum density
 Actual density
 Voids in total mix (Air void) %
 Voids in mineral aggregate %
 Voids filled with binder %
 Marshall stability (kN)
 Marshall flow (mm)

9
Marshall Test Key Information

10
Marshall Test Key Information

11
Marshall Test Key Information
100
(a) Theoretical max. density  t 
100  Pb Pb

Gse Gb
where Pb % = percentage by weight of binder in the mixture
Gse = Effective Specific Gravity of the mixed aggregate
Gb = Specific gravity of binder; Hence, γb = γw Gb
w = Density of water = 1.0 g/cm3 = 1000 kg/m3

12
Marshall Test Key Information
(b) Voids in total mix (air void) %

where = measured density of specimen =

13
Marshall Test Key Information
(c) Voids in mineral aggregate, VMA %

14
Marshall Test Key Information
(d) Voids filled with bitumen (VFB % )

15
Example
 A bituminous mixture consists of 93.5% of
mixed aggregate (Gse=2.6) and 6.5% of
bitumen (S.G.=1.03) by weight. The bulk
density of the compacted mixture is 2.322
g/cm3. Calculate the percentages of air voids,
voids in mineral aggregates, and voids filled
with bitumen.

16
BSG of Compacted HMA
 AC mixed with agg. and compacted into
sample

Mass agg. and AC


Gmb =
Vol. agg., AC, air voids
Testing

 Mixing of asphalt and aggregate


 Compaction of sample
 Mass of dry sample
 Mass under water
 Mass saturated surface dry (SSD)
Testing
Obtain mass of dry
compacted sample
Testing

Obtain mass of specimen


at SSD
Calculations
 Gmb = A / ( B - C )

Where:
A = mass of dry sample
B = mass of SSD sample
C = mass of sample under water
Maximum Specific Gravity
 Loose (uncompacted) mixture

Mass agg. and AC


Gmm =
Vol. agg. and AC
Testing

 Mixing of asphalt and aggregate


 Mass in air
 Mass under water
Testing
Loose Mix at
Room
Temperature
Testing
Residual
Manometer

Metal Bowl with Lid

Vacuum Pump

Shaker Table
Calculations
 Gmm = A / ( A - C )

Where:
A = mass of dry sample
C = mass of sample under water
Percent Air Voids
 Calculated using both specific gravities

Gmb
Air voids = ( 1 - ) 100
Gmm

Mass agg + AC
Vol. agg, AC, Air Voids Vol. agg, AC
=
Mass agg + AC Vol. agg, AC, Air Voids
Vol. agg, AC
Marshall Stability and Flow
 Marshall Test
 Specimen is preheated and placed
in the testing head
 Load is applied at the rate of 50
mm/min
 A dial gauge is used to measure
the vertical deformation
 Marshall Stability is the Max
Load (in kN) required to
produce failure
 Marshall Flow is the
deformation depth (in mm) at
the failure load
28
HK Specifications for Typical
Bituminous Materials

29
Marshall Design Use of Data
Asphalt Institute Procedure
Air Voids, Stability Unit Wt.
%

4%

Asphalt Content, % Asphalt Content, % Asphalt Content, %

Target optimum asphalt content = average

30
Marshall Design Use of Data
Asphalt Institute Procedure
Flow VMA, %

Maximum OK
OK
Minimum

Asphalt Content, % Asphalt Content, %

Use target optimum asphalt content


to check if these criteria are met
31
Marshall Design Method
 Advantages
 Attention on voids, strength, durability
 Inexpensive equipment
 Easy to use in process control/acceptance

 Disadvantages
 Impact method of compaction
 Does not consider shear strength
 Load perpendicular to compaction axis

32

You might also like