Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bulk Relations For Transport of Total Bed Material Load: © Gary Parker November, 2004
Bulk Relations For Transport of Total Bed Material Load: © Gary Parker November, 2004
with applications to
RIVERS AND TURBIDITY CURRENTS
© Gary Parker November, 2004
CHAPTER 12:
BULK RELATIONS FOR TRANSPORT OF TOTAL BED MATERIAL LOAD
The total bed material load is equal to the sum of the bedload and the bed material
part of the suspended load; in terms of volume transport per unit width, qt = qb + qs.
Here wash load, i.e. that part of the suspended load that is too fine to be
contained in measurable quantities in the river bed, is excluded from qs. Total bed
material load is quantified in various ways in addition to qt
Concentration in milligrams per liter = sqt/(qt + qw)106, where qt and qw are in m2/s
and s is in tons/m3.
In the great majority of cases of interest qt/qw << 1, so that the concentration in
milligrams per liter is accurately approximated by the mass concentration in parts2
per million.
1D SEDIMENT TRANSPORT MORPHODYNAMICS
with applications to
RIVERS AND TURBIDITY CURRENTS
© Gary Parker November, 2004
Perhaps the simplest of these relations is that due to Engelund and Hansen (1967).
It takes the form
0.05 5 / 2
qt ( )
Cf
where
qt b u2
q
t ,
RgD50 D50 RgD50 RgD50
U H
Û , Ĥ
RgD50 D50
In the above relations g is the geometric standard deviation of the bed sediment
and cF takes the value of 1 for laboratory conditions and 1.268 for field conditions.
The relation is designed to be used in conjunction with the Brownlie (1981)
formulation for hydraulic resistance. 4
1D SEDIMENT TRANSPORT MORPHODYNAMICS
with applications to
RIVERS AND TURBIDITY CURRENTS
© Gary Parker November, 2004
2.5 uD50 vs
0 . 66 , 1 . 2 70 Rf
Uc og10 50 0.06
uD RgD50
vs RgD50 D50
uD Rep
2.05 , 70 50
In the above relations vs is the fall velocity associated with sediment size D50. 5
1D SEDIMENT TRANSPORT MORPHODYNAMICS
with applications to
RIVERS AND TURBIDITY CURRENTS
© Gary Parker November, 2004
n
1.00 0.56 og10 Re p2 / 3 , 1 Re p2 / 3 60
0 , 60 Re p2 / 3
9.66
2 / 3 1.34 , 1 Re p 60
2/3
U H
m Re p Cz , Ĥ
1.50 , 60 Re p2 / 3 u D50
0.23 Re p1/ 3 0.14 , 1 Re p2 / 3 60
A aw
0.17 , 60 Re p2 / 3
2.86 og10 ( Re p2 / 3 ) [og10 ( Re p2 / 3 )]2 3.53 , 1 Re p2 / 3 60
og10Caw
1.60 , 60 Re p2 / 3 6
1D SEDIMENT TRANSPORT MORPHODYNAMICS
with applications to
RIVERS AND TURBIDITY CURRENTS
© Gary Parker November, 2004
where u*c can be evaluated from Brownlie’s (1981) fit to the original Shields curve:
0. 6 ( 7.7 Re p 0.6 ) R gD D
0.22 Re
c p 0.06 10 , Re p
The above relation may be used in conjunction with their relation for hydraulic
resistance presented in Chapter 9. Karim (1998) also presents a total bed material
load equation that is fractionated for mixtures;
2.97 1.47
qti U u
0.00139 i
Fai RgDi Di
RgDi v si Fai
Fi / Di
n
D
i C1 i
C2
v v
, C1 1.15 s50 , C2 0.60 s50
Fi / Di
i1 7
D50 u u
1D SEDIMENT TRANSPORT MORPHODYNAMICS
with applications to
RIVERS AND TURBIDITY CURRENTS
© Gary Parker November, 2004