Professional Documents
Culture Documents
4 X 3 or 1.33 Aspect Ratio: Composition and Camera Movement
4 X 3 or 1.33 Aspect Ratio: Composition and Camera Movement
4 X 3 or 1.33 Aspect Ratio: Composition and Camera Movement
Composition
Composition exists in a context. That context is the frame, which is itself an element of picture composition. In 1894 Thomas Edison introduced
the Kinetoscope motion picture format, with an aspect ratio (ratio of picture width to height) of four units wide to three units high, or 1.33 to 1. For
the next fifty years most film used the 1.33 aspect ratio. Sixteen millimeter, eight and “super eight” millimeter film formats and NTSC, PAL, and
SECAM television standards all share the 1.33 ratio.
Artists and mathematicians from the ancient Greeks and Egyptians have focused on the “golden rectangle” as the perfect shape. The aspect
ratio of the golden rectangle is 1.618. One might presume (although I’ve found no evidence so far) that the 1.33 aspect ratio is a compromise
between the most efficient ratio and the most esthetically pleasing.
Over the years a number of standard sizes with different aspect ratios became popular. The 8x10 photograph (1.25), the 4x6 photograph (1.5),
and the 35mm slide (1.5) are a few examples. Film evolved, too. Cinerama (2.5 - 3.0), Cinemascope (2.55), and Panavision (1.78 – 2.4) are a
few standards among many. High definition television has an aspect ratio of 16 by 9, or 1.78. The shape of the frame is the first consideration
in composition.
A medium shot shows most of the subject, including all parts of the subject that are important to
understanding what the subject is doing. A medium shot of a person sitting still might show his body from the
waist up, letting hands and the lower half of his body fall outside the frame.