This document discusses various forms of research misconduct including fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, redundant publication, salami slicing, ghost authorship, and gift authorship. It defines each practice and provides examples. The document also discusses conflicts of interest in research and their importance in transparency. Researchers are encouraged to always declare any competing interests that could affect their judgment or embarrass them.
Original Description:
University level lecture presentation on publication ethics
This document discusses various forms of research misconduct including fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, redundant publication, salami slicing, ghost authorship, and gift authorship. It defines each practice and provides examples. The document also discusses conflicts of interest in research and their importance in transparency. Researchers are encouraged to always declare any competing interests that could affect their judgment or embarrass them.
This document discusses various forms of research misconduct including fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, redundant publication, salami slicing, ghost authorship, and gift authorship. It defines each practice and provides examples. The document also discusses conflicts of interest in research and their importance in transparency. Researchers are encouraged to always declare any competing interests that could affect their judgment or embarrass them.
B.Sc. MLT Ph.D. Microbiology FABRICATION OF RESULTS (Invention of data/ Cooking data)
O The actual making up of research data and (the
intent of) publishing them.
O Making up progress notes of patient visits that
never took place and inserting them in the medical records
O Preparing records for calls and follow up contacts
for participants who already died FALSIFICATION OF RESULTS (Willful distortion of data/Altering truthful information)
O Manipulation of research data & processes in order to reflect
or prevent a certain result
O Substituting one subject’s record for that of another subject
O Altering dates and results from subject’s eligibility visits
O Backdating test or interview dates to fit protocol
time window PLAGIARISM
O Taking over the ideas, methods, or written words of another,
without acknowledgment and with the intention that they be taken as the work of the deceiver.
O SELF PLAGIARISM -Problems
Multiple submissions waste editor and reviewer time
The editorial process of your manuscripts will be
completely stopped if the duplicated submissions are discovered
DO NOT send your paper to a second journal until
you receive the final decision from the first REDUNDANT PUBLICATION
An author should not submit for consideration
in another journal a previously published paper
At the time of submission authors should
disclose details of related papers, even if in a different language, and similar papers in press SALAMI SLICING/DATA FRAGMENTATION
The partitioning of a large study which should have
been reported in a single paper into smaller published studies
Acceptable if different message to different
readership
Unacceptable if degree of overlap is great
7 GHOST AUTHORSHIP
O Ghost authors may be employed (an expert is “hired”) to prepare
clinical trial results for publication to lend an air of credibility & neutrality to manuscript.
O Difficult to detect & may be identified after investigation.
O May be used to mask conflicts of interest with industry.
GIFT AUTHORSHIP
O Giving authorship to a person who is not
qualifying authorship criteria
O Very Common in our set up
CONFLICT OF INTEREST?
A person has a conflict of interest when he or she has an attribute that is
invisible to the reader or editor but which may affect his or her judgement. Why does it matter? Because it may have a profound effect on somebody’s judgement. Because of the perception that a person’s judgement may be affected-- whether it is or not Problems with conflict of interest Should it be just financial, personal, academic, political, anything? People don’t declare it because a) it implies wickedness;
b) they are confident that their judgement is not affected
The best policy on competing interest
Always declare, particularly one that would embarrass you. Questions/Suggestions khurramthalwi@hotmail.com