Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Econ 100.2 Discussion Class 3: 2/1/18 JC Punongbayan
Econ 100.2 Discussion Class 3: 2/1/18 JC Punongbayan
2
Discussion Class 3
2/1/18
JC Punongbayan
Focus: Production possibilities frontier
Focus: Production possibilities frontier
(hitting 5 birds with one stone)
• 1. Tradeoffs — Resources are scarce.
• 2. Opportunity costs — Law of increasing
opportunity costs.
• 3. Efficiency — A perfectly efficient economic
produces on the curve, not inside it.
• 4. Growth — Economic growth means pushing the
PPF outward.
• 5. Gains from trade & specialization — The basis of
trade is comparative advantage (not absolute
advantage).
1. Tradeoffs
2. Law of increasing opportunity costs
(low-hanging fruit)
3. Efficiency
• Allocative or
Pareto efficiency:
You can’t have
more of a
resource without
having less of
others.
– Versus
inefficiency.
• Unemployment
rate: World War v.
Great Depression
(graph).
Unemployment rate in the US: 1890-2009
Source: Wikipedia
4. Economic growth
• E.g., PH & Sokor.
• Conditions for
outward shift:
1. More inputs of
production
2. Technological
advances
• Growth does NOT
eliminate scarcity.
Which of the following
Exercise statements is true?
1. If the PH is producing at point
C, it is using all its resources
efficiently.
2. The opportunity cost of
producing more machines is
constant.
3. Producing at point C is the
most preferable because
butter is a nondurable good.
4. The PH cannot produce at
point E.
5. The economy is not
producing at its potential
since it is not producing at
point D.
Exercise Here’s the PPF of Sam:
1. Starting at B, what is the OC of producing
2 more belts?
2. Starting at C, what is the OC of producing
• xxx
5 more hats?
3. A new tech allowed Sam to produce
twice more hats given existing resources.
Draw the new PPF.
4. At point C, what happened to the OC of
producing 5 more hats?
(0,100)
(20,80)
(40,50)
(50,0)
Supply and demand
• Quick review
• Things you might be asked.
Source
— Thomas Carlyle
Price as a signal
• For consumers
– Buy more of cheaper goods
– Buy less of expensive goods
• For producers
– Produce more of goods
whose price go up
– Produce less of those whose Source
price go down
A demand curve
Price
5
QD = 25 – 5P
4 25 0
20 1
3 15 2
10 3
2
5 4
0 5
1
Rice (tons)
0 5 10 15 20 25
Source: Prof.
Noel de Dios
Reasons for downward-
sloping demand
• “Substitution effect”
– As the price of a good goes up, people replace it
with similar goods whose prices have remained
the same
• “Income effect”
– A higher price for the good makes people feel
poorer and therefore buy less of this good and
most other goods
• Ordinary good v. Giffen good (rare).
Changes in other factors shift the demand curve
Price QD = 25 – 5P
QD = 35 – 5P
5
Rice
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Source: Prof.
Noel de Dios
A supply curve
Price
4
QS = – 20 + 10P
3 0 2
10 3
2 20 4
30 5
1
Rice
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Source: Prof.
Noel de Dios
Note: No “law of supply”
E.g., Backward-bending labor supply
Shift in the supply curve
Price
QS = – 20 + 10P
2
QS = – 15 + 10P
1
Rice
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Source: Prof.
Noel de Dios
What determines the
price that prevails?
• Equilibrium price
– That price at which quantity demanded equals
quantity supplied
– The price where buyers and sellers see no need to
revise their decisions or actions
• At any other price than equilibrium, buyers
and sellers will revise their plans, since they
cannot fulfill these
Market equilibrium determines price
Price
Rice
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Source: Prof.
Noel de Dios
Computing for equilibrium
price & quantity (simple algebra)
• Table method (meh…)
• Given:
– Supply curve: Qs = 120 + 1.5P
– Demand curve: Qd = 189 – 2.25P
• Goal: At what price P is Qs = Qd?
Q1
• Given the following, graph Kevin’s demand
schedule for J.Co donuts.
Quantity
demanded
by Kevin
Price (pesos (donuts per
per donut) week)
50 5
35 10
20 15
15 20
5 25
Source
Q2
• Below are the demand schedules for J.Co donuts for Ellen, Tobi, and Cali.
If the three of them constituted the whole market, what would the
market demand schedule look like?
Quantity demanded (donuts per week)
Price
(pesos per donut) Ellen Tobi Cali
50 0 5 10
35 5 10 15
20 10 15 20
15 15 20 25
5 20 25 30
Q3
Price (pesos) • Starting at point (a), which point
represents a:
– Decrease in quantity demanded?
– Decrease in demand?
c – Increase in demand?
d – Increase in quantity demanded?
a
e
b
Mangoldt
[1863] Jenkin Marshall [1895]
[1870]
END