1) There is debate around who is responsible for naming Jose Rizal as the Philippine's national hero and the motivations behind the choice.
2) Some historians argue it was the American colonial government who chose Rizal to avoid elevating revolutionary figures that may have inspired further armed uprisings against their rule.
3) As a pacifist, Rizal was seen as a symbol that would discourage Filipinos from revolting, unlike heroes of the revolution like Bonifacio. However, others note Rizal was already widely revered by Filipinos even before American involvement.
1) There is debate around who is responsible for naming Jose Rizal as the Philippine's national hero and the motivations behind the choice.
2) Some historians argue it was the American colonial government who chose Rizal to avoid elevating revolutionary figures that may have inspired further armed uprisings against their rule.
3) As a pacifist, Rizal was seen as a symbol that would discourage Filipinos from revolting, unlike heroes of the revolution like Bonifacio. However, others note Rizal was already widely revered by Filipinos even before American involvement.
1) There is debate around who is responsible for naming Jose Rizal as the Philippine's national hero and the motivations behind the choice.
2) Some historians argue it was the American colonial government who chose Rizal to avoid elevating revolutionary figures that may have inspired further armed uprisings against their rule.
3) As a pacifist, Rizal was seen as a symbol that would discourage Filipinos from revolting, unlike heroes of the revolution like Bonifacio. However, others note Rizal was already widely revered by Filipinos even before American involvement.
Hero Finals Objectives • Towards the end of the chapter, the student is expected to: 1. Demonstrate a better and deeper understanding of the controversies and issues that revolves around persona of the national hero 2. Critically analyze the issues and concepts in the light of new investigation and researches thus presented 3. Be able to gain a more in depth appreciation and develop a well rounded perception of Rizal as a man, and as a hero Rizal’s Fame and Extreme Popularity • Rizal’s life has been an open book • Has been scrutinized to the fullest extent and at times has been immersed in deep seated and lingering controversies • The price of fame that the hero possesses Why was Rizal the National Hero? • The question is raised as to who really is responsible for making him the national hero and on what grounds are these largely based upon. • Renato Constantino • opined that it was the American colonial government that was responsible for making him the national hero • Firm on the belief that the choice of Rizal as the national hero is primarily guided by the colonial policies that the American civil government tried to advocate An American-Sponsored Hero? • 1901, Civil Governor of the Philippines William Howard Taft – suggested to the Philippine Commission that the people be given a national hero • Rizal was voted as national hero which was sealed under the Treaty of Paris signed on December 10, 1898 • The Philippine Commission – the law making body of the country adopted the proclamation of Rizal as national hero They say that the Americans played a big part in giving Rizal the much debated title. This is to avoid setting “a revolutionary figure that might lead to more armed struggles.” The primary reason is somewhat acceptable. The Americans must have really feared that declaring any war-hero of the revolution might inflame another revolution that would endanger their hold of the Philippines If they had pursued on Bonifacio, this is like boldly saying, “Hey, revolt against us, you should fight for your freedom like what your national hero did against the Spaniards.” Thus, they made a pacifist as a symbol for Filipino through none other than Jose Rizal. And in this way, the Filipinos, having been pacified, would hesitate on engaging on any more movers of revolting against American colonial regime. And in addition to this is the fact that there was nothing anti American that Rizal wrote. Why? For the simple reason that Rizal was already long gone when the Americans colonized the country. Other Heroes • Andres Bonifacio – leader of Katipunan (KKK, password was “Rizal”), the headquarters and meeting places had a picture of Rizal, he made Rizal the honorary president of the Katipunan and even attempted to rescue him from exile in Dapitan so he could lead, or at least inspire the Filipinos to revolt • Emilio Aguinaldo – declared December 30 to be an annual “day of national mourning” in honor of Rizal Americans’ Role? • Although the Americans encouraged the hero worship of Rizal, the man was already a national hero to the Filipinos long before the Americans sponsored him as such • The Americans simply built on the prevailing sentiment of the people
To Claim Jose Rizal as the Foremost National Hero of the Philippines May Be Open for Debate as Some Will Contend That It Was Actually the Americans Who Had Decided to Make Him the Rallying Symbol for All Filipinos Instead of Andres Bonifacio Because