Alternative Dispute Resolution System: Concept and History of Adr in India

You might also like

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 10

ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE

RESOLUTION SYSTEM

CONCEPT AND HISTORY OF ADR IN INDIA

TANYA CHHABRA
3591-B
SEM-9
MEANING OF ADR

• Any Method of resolving disputes without


litigation (outside the courtroom) is known as
Alternate Dispute Resolution System (ADRs).
• It is a substitute to conventional methods of
resolving methods.
• It consists of simple methods and free from
procedural technicalities.
EVOLUTION

1. Panchayats
2. Gathering/ Family Council
3. Adhikrita & Nripa (Courts appointed by King)
4. Marathas Period
5. Muslim Period (Hedaya Judge known as Kazee)
ADR IN INDIA
• In India, the law and practice of private and
transactional commercial disputes without court
intervention can be dated back to ancient times.
• Arbitration/ Mediation as an alternative to
dispute resolution by Municipal Courts has been
prevalent in India from Vedic time.
Cont..
• In India, the Arbitral bodies, known as
Panchayats, dealt with variety of disputes as
disputes of contractual, matrimonial and even of
a criminal nature.
• The disputants would ordinarily accept the
decision of the panachayat and hence a
settlement arrived consequent to conciliation by
the panchayat would be as binding as the
decision that was on clear legal obligations.
INDIAN RESPONSE TO LITIGATION EXPLOSION
• ADR mechanisms were initiated by EIC-British Raj
• Bengal Resolution Act, 1772
• Regulations of 1787, 1793, 1795
• 1802, 1814, 1822, 1883
• Madras Presidency Regulation Act 7 in 1860
• Act 8 in 1857
• Indian Arbitration, 1899- English Arbitration Act, 1889
• Civil Procedure Code, 1908
• Arbitration Act, 1940
• Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996
ADVANTAGES OF ADR
1. More flexibility
2. ADR is speedy
3. Expenses are reduced
4. Select your own Arbitrator/ Mediator
5. Results can be kept confidential
6. Preserves relationship
7. Party Participation
8. Finality of Awards
DISADVANTAGES OF ADR

• There is no guaranteed Resolution


• Possibility of Bias
• Decisions are final (No Appeal)
• Discovery limits
• Informal, more opportunity of Abuse of power
• Lack of power- to establish legal precedents
CONCLUSION
• ADR refers to a variety of processes that help
parties resolve disputes without a trial.
• It is a procedure for settling disputes by means
other than litigation.
• It is a substitute to conventional methods of
resolving disputes which covers civil and
commercial nature of business.
• The main aim is to provide alternative mode of
dispute resolution in the common law countries.
O U..
A NK Y
T H

You might also like