Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sustainable Exit Strategies
Sustainable Exit Strategies
“The responsibility will be handed over to local government” – but with little or
no contact with local government
“The project will be absorbed into the government budget” – but no one asked
the Ministry of Finance!
“ The business will be sustainable through profits” – but failing to recognize that
during the project the business relied on subsidy
“The community or group will manage the activity” – but ignoring how much
the group was dependent on the NGO field staff
“Dependent individuals will transfer to government safety nets” – but no
change in the mechanism through which these are allocated
“beneficiaries will transition into mainstream services” – but are the service
providers for this segment available?
“local elites will continue to provide support” – is there any incentive or
mechanism in place?
“assets have been transferred” – they can easily be lost
Exit or sustainability strategies often fail to
address the underlying factors causing or
tending to sustain extreme poverty – and
hence have a low probability of success
Poverty Drivers : shocks, health, family
fragmentation, lost assets/savings
40
34 Threshold 2012
22
Exclusion threshold
2017
March
3-5%
2010
10 mean
0
For Scale Fund (Round One, Phase One):
between March 2010 and March 2012
beneficiaries showed a 66% increase in
average income (rural) and 90% (urban)
(before inflation)
CMS3 data
But 76% (rural) and 31% urban BHH remain in
extreme poverty on the basis on the HIES
Lower Poverty 2010 line adjusted for inflation