Thesis

Click to edit Master title style
The Current
Enrollment
Process in a
Local College in
Angeles City
1
Introduction

As of the present the local college in Angeles City is the City
College of Angeles (CCA) only. Since the establishment of CCA,
back in 2012 up to the present, the students, faculty and
related college personnel are still using the manual process
during the enrollment period. The enrollment process of CCA
since established is tedious. For the past two years the college
introduced more courses that become one of the factors for
the continuous growth of the college student population. Due
to the increasing population of City College of Angeles every
year,
S u b tthe
itle researchers would like to suggest the college to
improve their enrollment process by using a computerized
enrollment system which would be much better than using the
old manual system.
2 2
Statement of Objective
The main objective of the study is to

determine if the current processes of
City College of Angeles is efficient and
to further evaluate if it requires
improvement due to the increasing
population of the students. To
improve the enrollment procedures
that will decrease working time
3 3
Statement of Hypothesis

- The Current Enrollment Process of
City College of Angeles needs to be
improved due to the increasing
population.
- The Current Enrollment Process of

City College of Angeles don’t need
improvement due to increasing
population.
4 4
Methodology

Participants of the Study
The participants of the study are

students from City College of Angeles. The
students were currently enrolled from 1st
Year to 4th Year, from different Institutes.
The researchers randomly select
respondent survey-questionnaire. Survey
questionnaire is distributed to the 335
students out of 2600 student population of
City College Angeles. 5 5
Research Instrument
The researchers conducted interviews and
used questionnaires as data gathering tools to
acquire the needed data.

Data Gathering Procedure

The researchers have used survey
questionnaire consisting of five statements for
survey and evaluation of the process.
Questions are prepared according to the
statement of the problem and current
enrolment processes. 6 6
7 7
Where: E = Excellent
VS = Very Satisfactory
S = Satisfactory
F = Fair
NS = Not Satisfied
Rating Weighted mean Interpretation

5 4.2-5.00 Excellent
4 3.40-4.10 Very Satisfactory
3 2.60-3.40 Satisfactory
2 1.80-2.50 Fair
1 1.00-1.70 Not Satisfied
8 8
Result and Discussion

In this chapter the researchers presented and interpreted
the data that were gathered throughout the study.
Discussed here are the information gathered by the
researchers in the process of survey and evaluation of the
enrollment process. Mainly the data that are from
questionnaires were analyzed and presented in very
methodical manners that are gathered throughout the study
prove to be crucial in the evaluation of the study. 9 9
Analysis of Data
In order to interpret specifically and clearly the data was

analyzed. This gave opportunity to the researchers an
overview of how the result of the study would be
determined. Furthermore, the analysis of data was done to
easily explain the data acquired by the researchers. After
the analysis of the data, it is interpreted in a narrative form
to be easily understood by the respondents and other
readers.
1010
Institute Frequency Percent
IBM 130 39%
ICSLIS 63 19%
IEAS 142 42%
Total 335 100%
Table 2.0 shows the Institute of the respondents.

Majority of the respondents are from the Institute of
Education, Arts and Sciences (IEAS) (42 %), then the
Institute of Business and Management (IBM) (39 %) and
lastly the Institute of Computer Studies and Library
Information Science (ICSLIS) (19 %). 1111
Year Frequency Percent
1st Year 87 26%
2nd Year 138 41%
3rd Year 39 12%
4th Year 71 21%
Total 335 100%
Table 2.1 shows the Year Level of the respondents.

Majority of the respondents are from the 2nd year (41
%), then the 1st year (26 %) next is the 4th year (21 %)
lastly the 3rd Year (12 %).
1212
Click3.toResponses
Table edit Master title stylefrom IBM on Current Enrollment Process
of the respondents
Statements X Interpretation
1. Fast enrollment processing. 2.930769 S
2. Grades were generated
3.169231 S
immediately.
3. Less mistake on student
records (Such as spelling of 3.584615 VS
names, birthday entries, etc.)
4. Records are kept accordingly. 3.953846 VS
5. Fast and efficient production
3.469231 VS
of student information
Overall Average 3.421538 VS
Legend: Excellent (E), Very Satisfactory (VS), Satisfactory (S), Fair (F),
Not Satisfied (NS). 1313
Click4.toResponses
Table edit Master title stylefrom ICSLIS on Current Enrollment Process
of the respondents
3.142857 S
immediately.
3. Less mistake on student records
(Such as spelling of names, birthday 3.492063 VS
entries, etc.)
5. Fast and efficient production of
3.365079 S
student information
Overall Average 3.393651 S
Not Satisfied (NS).
1414
Click 5.
Table toResponses
edit Master title stylefrom IEAS on Current Enrollment Process
of the respondents
3.542254 S
immediately.
3. Less mistake on student records
(Such as spelling of names, birthday 3.739437 VS
entries, etc.)
5. Fast and efficient production of
3.781690 VS
student information
Not Satisfied (NS).
1515
Click to edit Master title
Table 6. Responses of the 1st
yearstyle
respondents on Current Enrollment Process
3.620690 VS
immediately.
3.885057 VS
Not Satisfied (NS).
1616
Table 7. Responses of the 2nd
yearstyle
respondents on Current Enrollment Process
3.369565 VS
immediately.
3.557971 VS
Not Satisfied (NS).
1717
Table 8. Responses of the 3rd
yearstyle
respondents on Current Enrolment Process.
3.025641 S
immediately.
3.025641 S
Overall Average 3.220513 S
Not Satisfied (NS).
1818
Table 9. Responses of the 4th
yearstyle
3.028169 S
immediately.
3.563380 VS
Not Satisfied (NS).
1919
Table 9. Responses of the 4th
yearstyle
3.028169 S
immediately.
3.563380 VS
Not Satisfied (NS).
2020
Click10.
Table toOverall
edit Master title
Survey Result. style
3.322388 S
immediately.
3.582090 VS
Not Satisfied (NS).
2121
Conclusion and Recommendations

Conclusion

After the researcher have conducted the study and with
the response gathered among the respondents, the
researchers concluded that the current enrollment process
of City College of Angeles should still be implemented in
register the student’s information during enrollment.

2222
Recommendation

After the researchers conducted the study, the
researchers strongly recommended the following:
1. The current enrollment process would still be

implemented as the main process of enrollment in City
College of Angeles.
2. The City College of Angeles may change their enrollment

system if there is an opportunity; further study may be
conducted (cost benefit analysis) if a computerized system
or automated system is needed. 2323
Thank You
Ruben Jr Macato
Ralph Daniel Aguilar
Ralph Anthony Macahilig
Jennica Miclat
Manilyn Naval
Joanna Marie Zabala
A401
24

Thesis

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Thesis

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Click to edit Master title style

The main objective of the study is to

- The Current Enrollment Process of

The participants of the study are

Rating Weighted mean Interpretation

Result and Discussion

In order to interpret specifically and clearly the data was

Table 2.0 shows the Institute of the respondents.

Table 2.1 shows the Year Level of the respondents.

1. The current enrollment process would still be

2. The City College of Angeles may change their enrollment

You might also like