Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Index
Index
Index
Framing
(Non-concrete/ non-metal)
Referenced Materials
Jeff Graybill
&
Johanna Mikitka
AE-390
Professor James E. Mitchell
October 20, 2004
Navigate the System:
System Description
Transmission of Loads
Loads to Consider
Detail for Dead Loads
Foundation Systems
Terms of the System
The System According to the class & Comments
Typical Uses
Limitations
Materials and Construction Issues
Numeric Parameters
Alternatives to Timber Construction
Typical Uses and Applications
Aluminum Structural Framing
Aluminum / Fiberglass Columns
Other Potential Alternative Building Materials
Advantages to Non- metal/concrete Structures
Generalizations
System Description
A Framed Building is a structure whose weight is carried by the
framework instead of by load-bearing walls. The term
includes modern metal and reinforced concrete structures as
well as timber-framed buildings.
There are several techniques for wood framed constructions:
Balloon Framing- A skeleton of light machine-cut uprights or studs is attached to the joints or
horizontal members by nails to form a cage or crate, with clapboard covering also nailed so that the
whole is held together by nails. The studs run from sill to roof plate, spaced about 16 inches apart.
Post and Beam- An ancient and, structurally, the simplest type of construction: vertical members
(columns, posts, piers, or walls) support horizontal members (beams or lintels).
Platform Framing- see Balloon Framing (Platform framing differs from balloon framing in that the
vertical members run from platform to platform rather than from sill to roof plate.)
Half-timbering- A method of construction in which walls are built of interlocking vertical and
horizontal timbers. The spaces are filled with non-structural walling of wattle and daub, lath and
plaster, etc.
TRIBUTARY AREA
BEAMS BEAMS BEAMS
C C C
O O O
L L L
U U U
M M M
N N N
S S S
FOUNDATION SYSTEM
THEY MADE IT! THE LOADS HAVE REACHED THE GROUND!
Contents of Table from Hibbeler - based on Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, ASCE 7-98.
Foundation Systems
Graphic: http://www.slcc.edu/tech/techsp/arch/courses/ARCH1210/Photos/Fndtyp.jpg
Terms of the System
1. Posts - In timber-framed buildings the main vertical
timbers of the walls.
2. Girder - A box girder is of hollow rectangular or
other closed cross-section with transverse plates
5 or other diaphragm members at intervals for
7 6 strengthening.
4 3. Principal Beam - In the body of a building a main
horizontal timber supporting floor or ceiling
joists.
4. Joist - Horizontal parallel timbers laid between the
3 walls or the beams of a building to carry the
2 floorboards.
5. King Post - A vertical timber standing centrally on a
tie- or a collar-beam and rising to the apex of the
roof where it supports the ridge.
6. Rafter - Inclined lateral timbers sloping from wall-
top to apex and supporting the roof covering.
7. Ridge Beam - A horizontal, longitudinal timber at
1 the apex of a roof supporting the ends of the
rafters.
All definitions taken from The Penguin Dictionary of
Graphic from Ching. Architecture and Landscape Architecture.
In terms of the Class
Class Definition of a System -"A series of individual components
interacting in order to ensure that a design functions as desired.”
In wood framing, the individual components are the different types of timbers
explained in Terms of the System.
Subsystems of wood framing include the following:
Foundation - needed to support the structure
Walls - often fabricated and installed as single components
Roof - many roof options are available (due to complexity of these systems, no
detail has been provided). Roof constructions include crown-post, king-post, truss,
gable, hammerbeam, hipped, gambrel, mansard, helm, etc.
Joint systems - there are many techniques for connecting the timber members.
Some techniques include mortice and tenon joints, steel plate connections, bolts,
nails, screws, etc.
The desired function for a wood frame is to adequately meet the spatial and
aesthetic needs as well as be structurally adequate to handle all potential loads.
Typical Uses for Wood Framing
Residential Construction
This is the most common use
Timber can be used to create many aesthetically pleasing irregular shapes
Economic/convenient source of building materials
Durable for residential use
Ease/speed of construction
Small Commercial Buildings
Many small commercial buildings are similar to residential construction
Modular quality is advantageous
Barns
Ease/speed of construction
Simplicity & Durability of structure
Modular benefits
Camp/Park facilities
Aesthetically pleasing/appropriate for location
Ease/speed of construction Graphic: http://www.iaw.on.ca/~blkcreek/
Toothed-ring Joints
are used similarly to
the spike grid
installation.
http://www.tpub.com/content/engineering/14070/css/14070_27.htm
Numeric Parameters
Nominal Depth of Beam vs. Span (Solid)
Depth of Beam vs. Span (Laminated)
Design Values: Bending, Tension, Shear,
Compression, and Modulus of Elasticity
How much does it weigh?
Nominal Depth vs. Span
This chart shows span
ranges based on the
nominal depth of the
wood beam selected.
Nominal depths are
slightly larger than
actual depths.
Note that with a 24”
beam depth maximum
span is only 32’.
Depth vs. Span
Laminated Beams
This chart shows span
ranges based on the depth
of the laminated wood
beam selected.
Laminated beams can span
greater distances that their
solid wood counterparts.
This is in part because their
size is not restricted by
nature.
Note that Span is in feet
and depth is in inches.
Design Values - Allowable Loadings
http://www.cwc.ca/products/lumber/visually_graded/us_values.php
Hem-Fir Design Values (psi)
Design values are in pounds per square inch (psi)
Tension Shear Compression Compression
parallel parallel perpendicular parallel to Modulus of
Bending to grain to grain to grain grain Elsasticity
Grade Size Fb Ft Fv Fc perp Fc E
2x4 1950 1160 1955
2x6 1690 1005 1870
Select
2x8 1560 930 145* 370 1785 1700000
Structural
2x10 1430 850 1700
2x12 1300 775 1700
2x4 1500 860 1665
Hem- No. 1 2x6 1300 745 1595
Fir & 2x8 1200 690 145* 370 1520 1600000
(North) No. 2 2x10 1100 630 1450
2x12 1000 575 1450
2x4 860 485 975
2x6 745 420 935
No. 3 2x8 690 390 145* 370 890 1400000
2x10 630 355 850
2x12 575 325 850
*New Shear Design Values
http://www.cwc.ca/products/lumber/visually_graded/us_values.php
Northern Species
Design Values (psi)
Design values are in pounds per square inch (psi)
Tension Shear Compression Compression
parallel parallel perpendicular parallel to Modulus of
Bending to grain to grain to grain grain Elsasticity
Grade Size Fb Ft Fv Fc perp Fc E
2x4 1500 675 1365
2x6 1300 585 1210
Select
2x8 1200 540 110* 350 1155 1700000
Structural
2x10 1100 495 1100
2x12 1000 450 1100
2x4 900 410 975
No. 1 2x6 780 355 935
Northern
& 2x8 720 330 110* 350 890 1600000
Species
No. 2 2x10 660 300 850
2x12 600 275 850
2x4 525 225 575
2x6 455 195 550
No. 3 2x8 420 180 110* 350 525 1400000
2x10 385 165 500
2x12 350 150 500
*New Shear Design Values
http://www.cwc.ca/products/lumber/visually_graded/us_values.php
Wood Densities for Design Loads
Industrial Containers
Advantages to Non-metal and
Concrete Structures
Great design flexibility
Modular, pre-fabricated, ease of manufacturing
High strength to weight ratio
Electrical/thermal insulating properties
Potentially longer lifespan
Cost effective
Ease of installation
Comparably Aesthetic to other traditional
materials
Generalization:
Wood framing is ideal for residential construction
and some commercial construction.
One of the best aspects to wood framing is the
modular concept. This allows you to expand with
great ease.
For further exploration, one could investigate the
combination of the systems presented by the class
in this project. More advanced structures may
need to use more than one structural concept act as
a system and perform the desired functions.
References:
Allen, E., Iano, J. The Architect’s Studio Companion - Rules of Thumb for
Preliminary Design. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons. 2002
Ching, Francis. A Visual Dictionary of Architecture. New York, New York:
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1997
Fleming, J., Honour, H., & Pevsner, N. The Penguin Dictionary of
Architecture and Landscape Architecture. 5th ed. New York: Penguin. 1999
http://www.slcc.edu/tech/techsp/arch/courses/ARCH1210/Photos/Fndtyp.jpg