Professional Documents
Culture Documents
On FP
On FP
OF
FINGERPRINTS
Each one of you has
something no one else has,
or has ever had:
your fingerprints, your
brain, your heart.
The science of fingerprint identification 5 stands out among
all other forensic sciences for many reasons, including the
following:
Has served worldwide governments for over a century to
provide accurate identification of persons. No two fingerprints
have ever been found alike in many billions of human and
automated computer comparisons. Fingerprints are the basis
for criminal history foundation at every police agency on
earth.
Established the first forensic professional organization, the
International Association for Identification (IAI), in 1915.
Established the first professional certification program for
forensic scientists, the IAI's Certified Latent Print Examiner
(CLPE) program in 1977. Far from claiming fingerprint experts
are infallible, for over four decades the IAI's certification
program has been issuing certification to those meeting
stringent criteria and revoking certification for quality
assurance problems such as erroneous identifications.
Continues to expand as the premier method for accurately identifying
persons in government record systems, with hundreds of thousands of
persons added daily to fingerprint repositories worldwide.
For more than a century, has remained the most commonly used
forensic evidence worldwide - in most jurisdictions fingerprint
examination cases match or outnumber all other forensic examination
casework combined. Fingerprints harvested from crime "scenes lead to
more suspects and generate more evidence in court than all other
forensic laboratory techniques combined. 2"
Is relatively inexpensive for solving crime. Expense is an important
factor because agencies must balance investigative resources to best
satisfy timeliness and thoroughness, without sacrificing accuracy. For
example, DNA is as ubiquitous as fingerprints at many crime scenes,
but costs typically 100 to 400 times more than fingerprint analysis for
each specimen, and can require additional months or years before
analysis is complete. Thus, while both fingerprints and DNA are
typically harvested from serious crimes such as sexual assault and
murder, fingerprints are often the primary evidence collected from
lesser crimes such as burglaries and vehicle break-ins.
Other visible human characteristics, such as facial features, tend to change considerably
with age, but fingerprints are relatively persistent. Barring injuries or surgery causing deep
scarring, or diseases such as leprosy damaging the formative layers of friction ridge skin,
finger and palm print features have never been shown to move about or change their unit
relationship throughout the life of a person (and injuries, scarring and diseases tend to
exhibit telltale indicators of unnatural change).
In earlier civilizations, branding or maiming were used to mark persons as criminals. The
thief was deprived of the hand which committed the thievery. Ancient Romans employed
the tattoo needle to identify and prevent desertion of mercenary soldiers from their ranks.
Before the mid-1800s, law enforcement officers with extraordinary visual memories, so-
called "camera eyes," identified previously arrested offenders by sight alone. Photography
lessened the burden on memory, but was not the answer to the criminal identification
problem. Personal appearances change.
Around 1870, French anthropologist Alphonse Bertillon devised a system to measure and
record the dimensions of certain bony parts of the body. These measurements were
reduced to a formula which, theoretically, would apply only to one person and would not
change during his/her adult life.
The Bertillon System was generally accepted for thirty years, however the anthropometric
measurement system never recovered from the events of 1903, when a man named Will
West was sentenced to the US Penitentiary at Leavenworth, Kansas. It was discovered
there was already a prisoner at the penitentiary, whose Bertillon measurements were nearly
the same, and his name was William West.
1685 - Bidloo
Dutch anatomist Govard Bidloo's 1685 book, "
Anatomy of the Human Body" included descriptions
of friction ridge skin (papillary ridge) details.
In 1686, Marcello Malpighi, an anatomy professor
at the University of Bologna, noted fingerprint
ridges, spirals and loops in his treatise. A layer of
skin was named after him; "Malpighi" layer, which is
approximately 1.8 mm thick.
At Buenos Aires, Argentina in 1892, Inspector Eduardo Alvarez made the first criminal fingerprint
identification. He was able to identify Francisca Rojas, a woman who murdered her two sons and
cut her own throat in an attempt to place blame on another. Her bloody print was left on a door
post, proving her identity as the murderer. Alvarez was trained by Juan Vucetich.
Sir Francis Galton published his book, "Finger Prints" in 1892, establishing the individuality and
permanence of fingerprints. The book included the first published classification system for
fingerprints. In 1893, Galton published the book "Decipherment of Blurred Finger Prints," and 1895
the book "Fingerprint Directories."
Galton's primary interest in fingerprints was as an aid in determining heredity and racial
background. While he soon discovered that fingerprints offered no firm clues to an individual's
intelligence or genetic history, he was able to scientifically prove what Herschel and Faulds already
suspected: that fingerprints do not change over the course of an individual's lifetime, and that no
two fingerprints are exactly the same. According to his calculations, the odds of two individual
fingerprints being the same were 1 in 64 billion.
Galton identified the characteristics by which fingerprints can be identified. A few of these same
characteristics (minutia) are basically still in use today, and are sometimes referred to as Galton
Details.
1897 - Haque & Bose
On 12 June 1897, the Council of the Governor General of
India approved a committee report that fingerprints should
be used for the classification of criminal records. Later that
year, the Calcutta (now Kolkata) Anthropometric Bureau
became the world's first Fingerprint Bureau. Working in the
Calcutta Anthropometric Bureau (before it became the
Fingerprint Bureau) were Azizul Haque (shown above) and
Hem Chandra Bose. Haque and Bose are the two Indian
fingerprint experts credited with primary development of the
Henry System of fingerprint classification (named for their
supervisor, Edward Richard Henry). The Henry classification
system is still used in English-speaking countries (primarily
as the manual filing system for accessing paper archive files
that have not been scanned and computerized).
1900 - E.R. Henry
The United Kingdom Home Secretary Office
conducted an inquiry into "Identification of
Criminals by Measurement and Fingerprints." Mr.
Edward Richard Henry (later Sir ER Henry) appeared
before the inquiry committee to explain the system
published in his recent book "The Classification and
Use of Fingerprints." The committee recommended
adoption of fingerprinting as a replacement for the
relatively inaccurate Bertillon system of
anthropometric measurement, which only partially
relied on fingerprints for identification.
1901
The Fingerprint Branch at New Scotland Yard (Metropolitan Police) was created in July
1901. It used the Henry System of Fingerprint Classification.
1902
Dr. Henry Pelouze de Forest pioneered the idea for the first American fingerprinting
file. The fingerprints were used to screen New York City civil service applicants.
1903
In 1903, the New York City Civil Service Commission, the New York State Prison
by a Sergeant from Scotland Yard who had been on duty at the St. Louis World's Fair
Exposition guarding the British Display. Sometime after the St. Louis World's Fair,
the International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP) created America's first
national fingerprint repository, called the National Bureau of Criminal Identification.
1905
U.S. Army begins using fingerprints.
Two years later the U.S. Navy started, and was joined the next year by the Marine
Corp. During the next 25 years more and more law enforcement agencies join in
the use of fingerprints as a means of personal identification. Many of these
agencies began sending copies of their fingerprint cards to the National Bureau of
Criminal Identification, which was established by the International Association of
Police Chiefs.
1907
U.S. Navy begins using fingerprints.
1908
U.S. Marine Corps begins using fingerprints.
1910
In 1910, Frederick Brayley published the first American textbook on fingerprints,
1915
Inspector Harry H. Caldwell of the Oakland, California Police Department's Bureau of
1940s
By the end of World War II, most American fingerprints experts agreed there was no
scientific basis for a minimum number of corresponding minutiae to determine an
"identification" and the twelve point rule was dropped from the FBI publication, "The
Science of Fingerprints."
1946
By 1946, the FBI had processed over 100 million fingerprint cards in manually
maintained files; and by 1971, 200 million fingerprint cards.
With the introduction of automated fingerprint identification system (AFIS)
technology, the files were later split into computerized criminal files and manually
maintained civil files. Many of the manual files were duplicates though, the records
actually represented somewhere in the neighborhood of 25 to 30 million criminals,
and an unknown number (tens of millions) of individuals represented in the civil files.
1973
The International Association for Identification Standardization Committee authored a resolution stating that each
identification is unique and no valid basis exists to require a minimum number of matching points in two friction
ridge impressions to establish a positive identification. The resolution was approved by members at the 1973 annual
conference.
Association for Identification (IAI) voted to establish the world's first certification program for fingerprint experts.
Since 1977, the IAI's Latent Print Certification Board has proficiency tested thousands of applicants, and
periodically proficiency tests all IAI Certified Latent Print Examiners (CLPEs).
Contrary to claims (since the 1990s) that fingerprint experts claim their body of practitioners never make
erroneous identifications, the Latent Print Certification program proposed, adopted, and active since 1977 has
specifically recognized such mistakes sometimes occur and must be addressed.
During the past three decades, CLPE status has become a prerequisite for journeyman fingerprint expert positions
in many US state and federal government forensic laboratories. IAI CLPE status is considered by many identification
professionals to be a measurement of excellence.
1995
At the International Symposium on Latent Fingerprint Detection and Identification, conducted by the Israeli National
Police Agency, at Neurim, Israel, June, 1995, the Neurim Declaration was issued. The declaration, (authored by Pierre
Margot and a fingerprint expert from the US Army Crime Lab), states "No scientific basis exists for requiring that a pre-
determined minimum number of friction ridge features must be present in two impression in order to establish a
positive identification." The declaration was unanimously approved by all present, and later, signed by 28 persons from
the following 11 countries: Australia, Canada, France, Holland, Hungary, Israel, New Zealand, Sweden, Switzerland,
United Kingdom, and United States.
2012
INTERPOL's Automated Fingerprint Identification System repository exceeds 150,000 sets of fingerprints for important
international criminal records from 190 member countries. Over 170 countries have 24 x 7 interface ability with
INTERPOL expert fingerprint services.
2019 - America's Largest Databases
The Department of Homeland Security's Office of Biometric Identity Management (OBIM was formerly US-VISIT), contains
over 120 million persons' fingerprints, many in the form of two-finger records. The US Visit Program has been
migrating from two flat (not rolled) fingerprints to ten flat fingerprints since 2007. "Fast capture" technology currently
enables recording of ten simultaneous fingerprint impressions in as little as 15 seconds per person.
As of July 2018, the FBI's Next Generation Identification (NGI) conducts more than 300,000 tenprint record searches per
day against more than 140 million computerized fingerprint records (both criminal and civil applicant records). The
300,000 daily fingerprint searches support 18,000 law enforcement agencies and 16,000 non-law enforcement
agencies7. At 70% more accurate that the FBI's previous version of automated latent print technology, NGI is the FBI's
most valuable service to American law enforcement, providing accurate and rapid fingerprint identification support.
FBI civil fingerprint files in NGI (mainly federal employees) have become searchable by all US law enforcement agencies in
recent years. Many enlisted military service member fingerprint cards received after 1990, and most (officer, enlisted
and civilian) military-related fingerprint cards received after 19 May 2000, have been computerized and are searchable.
The FBI is continuing to expand their automated identification activities to include other biometrics such as palm, face, and
iris. Face search capabilities in NGI are a reality for many US law enforcement agencies accessing NGI, and several are
participating in iris pilot projects.
All US states and many large cities have their own AFIS databases, each with a subset of fingerprint records that is not stored in
any other database. Many also store and search palmprints. Law enforcement fingerprint interface standards are important to
enable sharing records and reciprocal searches to identify criminals.
International Sharing
Many European nations currently leverage multiple fingerprint information sharing operations, including the following:
Schengen Information System (SIS); Visa Information System (VIS); European Dactyloscopy (EURODAC); and Europol. Additionally,
a biometric-based Entry Exit System (EES) is in planning stages. Many other countries exchanges searches/fingerprint records in
a similar manner as Europe, with automated and non-automated interfaces existing in accordance with national/international
privacy laws and the urgency/importance of such searches.
With a biometric database many times larger than any other in the world, Aadhaar's ability to leverage automated fingerprint
and iris modalities (and potentially automated face recognition) enables rapid and reliable automated searching and
identification impossible to accomplish with fingerprint technology alone, especially when searching children and elderly
residents' fingerprints (children are fingerprinted and photographed as young as age 5). As of January 2017, the Authority has
issued more than 1.11 billion (more than 111 crore) Aadhaar numbers.