Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ongc & Imperial
Ongc & Imperial
• Guided by:
• Prof. salim G Sonnekhan Submitted by:
SDMCET Dharwad Karthik B Ghorpade
ONGC
• The cash offer of 1,250 pence a share is 61.9 percent more than Imperial
Energy's stock price on July 11, the day before the London-based company
said it received a bid, according to a statement distributed by Regulatory
News Service. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. indicated today it may
bid for Imperial Energy.
• MOTIVES OF THE MERGER
They want to increase their market share, spread their costs and risks,
become more international and also for the need to transform their corporate
identity.
India's explorers have been outbid by Chinese rivals as the two most
populous nations compete for energy assets globally.
The explorer paid $1.7 billion to buy a stake in Exxon Mobil Corp.'s Sakhalin-
I field in Russia and $785 million for a stake in the Greater Nile project in
Sudan, both in 2003. State-run ONGC owns 20 percent of Sakhalin-1, which
began pumping oil in 2005 and produced 250,000 barrels a day in February
2007.
Scheme of
merger
Effective Date of 31st March 2010
Merger
Year of Merger 2010
Industry Acquiring company: Oil and Natural gas
Acquired company: Natural Gas
Type of Merger Horizontal with concentric merger (Product
Business Group Extension)
ONGC group
Exchange Ratio It has takeover of Imperial energy with about
2.1 billion.
.
Table showing Pre and Post-merger Key Indicators of
ONGC
N P Margin (in %)
25.07 26.84 107.06
RONW (in %) 23.33 17.18 73.63
Liquidity Ratio 2.99 2.43 81.27
Leverage Ratio 127.58 113.6 89.04
Sales (in crores) 60666 72328.25 119.22
R & S (in crores) 68286.33 101805.5 149.08
EPS (in Rs.) 75.54 38.58 51.07
DPS (in Rs.) 31.66 15.25 48.16
P/E Ratio 3.72 3.55 95.43
BVPS (in Rs.) 329.26 199.88 60.70
Share Price (in Rs.)
282.05 139.075 48.57
Conclusion
Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A) prime motive is to improve the value,
wealth and growth of the enterprise but in the current case it is been
observed that M&A has no effect on the company performance in Oil and
Gas sector
It has been concluded that that there is no significant improvement
in financial and operating standards in post-merger period.
The results have been raised which indicated that there is no significance
difference in the defined financial performance standards between pre-merger
and post-merger due to the significance value is greater than 0.05. Hence, this
study has accepted the null hypotheses which consider that there are no
significant improvements in surviving company’s performance post-merger and
acquisition and rejected the alternative hypothesis which considers that there is
significance improvement in surviving company’s performance post-merger and
acquisition activity.
THANK YOU