Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Institute of Technology of Cambodia
Institute of Technology of Cambodia
Institute of Technology of Cambodia
I INTRODUCTION
II OBJECTIVE
III METHODOLOGY
V CONCLUSION
Introduction
1
Objective
2
Material and Method Gluten free bread recipes
Ingredients (g) F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 F7 F8
FLOUR CHARACTERISTICS:
FLOUR CHARACTERISTICS: STANDARD
STANDARD
METHOD(AACC,1999,AOAC,1990)
METHOD(AACC,1999,AOAC,1990)
Moisture: Oven
Moisture: Oven drying
drying (AACCI
(AACCI method
method 44-15.02)
44-15.02) Oven drying Muffle
Total nitrogen
Total nitrogen content:
content: Kjeldahl
Kjeldahl ,AACCI
,AACCI method
method
44-12.01
44-12.01
Fat content:
Fat content: Soxhlet
Soxhlet (AACCMethod
(AACCMethod 30-25.01)
30-25.01)
Ash content:
Ash content: Muffle
Muffle (AACC
(AACC method
method 08-01.01)
08-01.01)
Crude fiber:
Crude fiber: AOAC
AOAC method
method 973.18
973.18 Kjelflex k- Soxtherm
360 analyzer
Water binding
Water binding capacity:
capacity: Cornejo
Cornejo and
and rosell(2015)
rosell(2015)
Fibertherm FT12 4
Materials and Method
Quality assessment of GF breads Hardness (g)
Cohesiveness
Minolta colorimeter
Weight loss during baking: Weighing
the pan before and after baking Texture Analyzer TA-XT2i 5
Materials and Method
In vitro digestion
Digestible of GF
bread
Equation Kinetic: C = C)
Glucose
Expected glycemic index ( eGI ): 8.198+
0.862HI
60
50
Percentages %
40
30
20
8.28
10 5.04 6.33
4.38
0.53
0
Carb Protein Ash Fat Crude fiber Moisture
Parameters
7
Result and Discussion
62 Moisture of Bread Weigh loss of bread
18
60.96 16.3
61
60.23 16 15.49 14.93
60 59.69 13.98
59.3 13.8 13.89
14 13.07
58.8 12.78
Moisture value (g/100g)
59 58.74
12
58 57.63
Percentages %
10
57
56 55.56 8
55 6
54 4
53
2
52
F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 F7 F8 0
F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 F7 F8
formulation
formulation
8
Result and Discussion
70
Color of Bread L* a* b*
8
40
1.74 1.7
1.63 1.67 1.65
Color
6
30
1.2 23.97
1.11 22.29
21.04 21.75 20.7 20.74
20.34
4 20 18.43
2 10 6.88 7.09
5.18 6.13 5.85 5.92 5.63 4.63
0 0
F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 F7 F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 F7 F8
Formulation Formulation
9
Result and Discussion
400 0.6
361
350 330 0.5
316 323
0.5
300
263 0.38
0.4 0.37
250 233 0.34 0.35
0.33 0.33
Hardness (g)
Cohesiveness
209 0.31
191
200 0.3
150
0.2
100
0.1
50
0 0
F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 F7 F8 F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 F7 F8
Formulation Formulation
10
Result and Discussion
Chewiness of Bread
80
69
70 65
60
54
50
50 45
Chewiness (g)
39
40
30 27
24
20
10
0
F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 F7 F8
11
Formulation
Result and Discussion
Springiness of Bread
0.8
Resilience of Bread
0.7
0.7
0.16
0.14
0.14 0.6
0.13 0.55
0.12 0.48
0.5 0.47 0.47
0.1 0.1 0.1 0.44 0.43
0.1 0.42
Springiness
0.1
0.09
0.4
Resilience
0.08
0.3
0.06
0.04 0.2
0.02
0.1
0
F1 F2 F3 F5 F6 F7 F8 0
F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 F7 F8
Type of bread Formulation
Type of bread Formulation
12
Result and Discussion
Digestibility of starch (%)
14
10
8 7.31 7.29
7.22 7.29
7.01 7.17 7.2
6.89
6.73 6.49
6.03 6.23 6.05
5.95 5.8 5.86
6 5.63
5.32 5.25 5.15
4.98
4.38
3.81
4
0
F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 F7 F8
13
Result and Discussion
Kinetic Constant Maximum Hydrolysis
H y d r o ly s is
K in etic Con stan t
0.06
M a x im u m
0.05
0.05 18 16.66 16.24
15.82 16.1
16
0.04 13.87
13.32 13.56
14
12.25
0.03 0.02 0.02 12
0.02 0.02 10
0.02 0.02
0.01 0.01 8
0.01 6
4
0
F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 F7 F8 2
0
Type of formulated bread F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 F7 F8
14
Result and Discussion
A r e a u n d e r H y d r o ly s is c u r v e
ACU HI
30 28.55
3000 25
2576
20.89 21.02 21.49
2500 19.01 18.21
20 17.35 17.29
1885 1897 1939
2000
1715 1643
HI (%)
1565 1560 15
1500
10
1000
5
500
0 0
F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 F7 F8 F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 F7 F8
15
Result and Discussion
eGI
eGI
35
30
%eGIe
25
20
15
10
0
F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 F7 F8
16
Type of bread formulation
Result and Discussion
In vitro and expected glycemic index of GF breads
17
Conclusion
Nutritionals Value
Volume
Technological quality
18
Thank you for
attention!
21