Rehabilitation of Drainage System of

Cau Sop Pumping station

GROUP 2
Instructor: Dr. Nguyen Quang Phi
Assoc. Prf. Dr. Nguyen Thi Hang
Nga
TE
TRINH MAI PHUONG

MEET THE

A
VU QUOC HUNG

NGUYEN CONG MINH

 3

CONTENT
01 Background of Cong Sao pumping station

02 Calculation of meteorology and hydrology

03 Design construction

04 Economic efficiency
01
BACKGROUND
01
www.zacomic.com

LOCATION Sat town, Binh Giang district, Hai Dương Province

Latitude: 20° 52' 13.3" N Longitude: 106° 11'36.2" E

“The best company is our company”

 - Area: 2134 ha
- 5 communes: Trang
Liet, Vinh Tuy, Vinh
Hong, Thuc Khang,
Tan Hong and a town
of Ke Sat. Figure 1.2 Map of drain region of Cau Sop
pumping station
 Natural characteristics
I

Topography and 94%

Meteorology and
geology Social and economic hydrology
dministrator
anager ordinator

Topography Geology Social Economic Being

Humid affected
Gradual tropical by Red
Influence Population Cutivation, animal
slope from by Red Alluvial climate river and
soil 33.731 husbandry, fishery Thai Binh
northeast to and TB people production
southwest river river
CURRENT STATE OF DRAINAGE
SYSTEM OF CAU SOP PUMPING
STATION
The drainage coefficient q
= 3.02 l/s/ha do not serve 
as the original design task.

Most of canal axes were


eroded and deposited

Most of the works

on the canal were 
damage.
02
www.zacomic.com

CALCULATION
OF
METOROLOGY
AND
HYDROLOGY
“The best company is our company”
 Station selection Designed frequency Period calculation
Hai Duong station P = 10% 5 days maximum
 Hai Duong meteorological Construction works of  Having high overlap times
station near the study area grade III works  The difference between 5
 Having full data of rainfall in
(according to QCVN days maximum and 7 days
recent 29 years (1990-2019) 04-05:2012/BNNPTNT) maximum is small.
 Having necessary data for  Having highest appearance
planning improvement frequency.
 Using
software
FFC 2008
to draw the
frequency
curve
From the frequency curve, Xp=10% = 320.78mm
02
Calculation of hydrological
www.zacomic.com

The typical rainfall model is 28-1/9/2007 with Xp = 325.7 mm

Table - Calculation of typical designed rainfall model

Total
Time 28/8HYDROLOGY
SURFACE WATER 29/8 30/8 31/8 1/9 precipitation
(mm)
XTP 5 192.2 114.8 13.2 0.5 325.7
KP 0.985
XP 4.9
“The best company is our company”
189.3 113.1 13.0 0.5 320.8
 02
Drainage coefficient
www.zacomic.com

a. Determining the drainage coefficient for rice paddy

3
 
q0i 2
q 0 i=0,273 m b0 i √ 2 g . H ⇒ q i  =  i
8.64
b.SURFACE WATER HYDROLOGY
Determining drainage regime for other types of area

qi =
 
(l/s/ha) with c is flow coefficient of each area.

 
 Drainage coefficient qi == qri. α r + qci . α c + qli . α l + qoi . α o
“The best company is our company”
 Type of area Paddy rice Crops Lake Other Total
Percentage 61.7 18.1 6.0 14.2 100

qr qc ql qo qi
Date
(l/s-ha) (l/s-ha) (l/s-ha) (l/s-ha) (l/s-ha)
Drainage 28/09 0.00 0.06 0.01 0.08 0.15

coefficien 29/09
30/09
4.31
9.95
2.38
1.42
0.26
0.16
2.96
1.77
9.91
13.30

t 31/09
01/10
4.57 0.16
0.01
0.02
0.00
0.2
0.01
4.96
1.18
1.17
02/10 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.31
03/10 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05
 02 www.zacomic.com
D r a in a g e c o e ffic ie n t (l/s -h a )

D r a in a g e c o e ffic ie n t (l/s -h a )
Drainage coefficient

Diagr am o f djuste d dr ainage

Drainage co effi cient (l/s/ha) co e ffi cient (l/ s/ ha)
14 13.30 20
12 SURFACE WATER HYDROLOGY
9.91 15
10
8
10 8.13 8.13
6 4.96
4 4.96
5
2.83 2.83 2.83
2 1.18
0.15 0.31 0.05 0.15
0 0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Drainage
a mm days Draiange days

 The drainage coefficient is qdesign = 8.13 (l/s-ha)

“The best company is our company”
03
www.zacomic.com

DESIGN
CONSTRUCTION
“The best company is our company”
 03
www.zacomic.com

Trapezoid canal
DESIGN CONSTRUCTION

 Roof coefficient m = 1.5 B

 Bottom slope i = 0.0001
 Roughness coefficient n = 0.03 m
 Bottom width b = 11 m b
 Water depth h = 2.37 m
“The best company is our company”
 Determination water levels in suction tank
 Determine the design suction tank water levels

𝐝𝐞𝐬𝐢𝐠𝐧
𝐙  =  𝐀 𝟎  − 𝐡𝟎  −  ∑ 𝐢𝐢 𝐥𝐢  −  ∑ 𝛗𝐢
 

𝐬𝐮𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐤
Determine elevation of channel’s bottom
 Z =–hdesign
channel’s bottom

 
Determine the lowest water level in suction tank
 = Z channel’s bottom + hmin
 Determine water levels in discharge tank
 
Determine the design discharge tank water level
 = + + hloss
 Determine maximum water level of discharge tank
 = + + hloss

Determine elevation of channel’s bottom

 Z =–hdesign
channel’s bottom
 
Determine the minimum discharge tank water level
 = Z channel’s bottom +
 03
DESIGN CONSTRUCTION
www.zacomic.com

Calculation of
water columns
of pumping
Determine the designed water column Hdesign
 H
stations
design = +

 Determine the maximum water column in the case of testing

 = +
Determine the minimum water column in the testing case
 = +
“The best company is our company”
03
DESIGN CONSTRUCTION
www.zacomic.com

Table - The design parameters

Water elevation (m)

Water head Flowrate
Suction tank (m) Discharge tank (m) (m) (m3/s)

Zdesign = 1.45 Zdesign = 3.38 Hdesign = 3.44 Qdesign =17.35

Zmax = 1.96 Zmax = 3.66 Hmax = 4.7 Qmax = 19.12

Z min= 0.46
“The best company is our company” Zmin = 2.39 H­min = 1.93 Qmin = 5.78
 Choosing 8 pumps
Choosing
22

  (m3/h)
HTD8000-4 of Hai

 )
Duong Pump
type of
Manufacturing Joint
Stock Company pumps
Type of Q H (m) N Nmotor Dsuction Ddischarge
pump (m3/h) (r/min) (kW) (m) (m)

HTD 8000 - 4 2601- 1.93 – 4.91 490 170 1.35 1.08

8604
 Table 3 - The plant dimension 23

Parameters Value Unit

Wet-chamber with
Type of pumping station a submersible-floor
machine

The height of whole plant 15.77 m

+ The height of pump floor 7.22 m

+ The height of motor floor 8.55 m

Width of pumping station 7.12 m

The length of a 2.70 m
compartment

The length of whole plant 29.3 m

04
ECONOMIC
EFFCIENC
Y
04
ECONOMIC EFFCIENCY
 Total investment Ci = 28.126.614.000 VND
 Investment distribution: 70 - 30 %
 The annual net income of the project
Construction cost area: 5.066.000.000 VND
 The annual operation management cost
Equipment cost
CQLVH = 843.018.670,50 (VND)
Management cost  NPV = 4.456.330.000 (VND) > 0
 = +
Consultant cost  IRR= 13.3% (i = 12%)
 B/C = 1.08 >1
Other cost
 
he project ensures economic
Redundancy cost efficiency
 THANKS
FOR
LISTENING !
Do you have any questions?
Group2_58nkn@gmail.com