LEADERSHIP

THAT GETS
RESULTS

Presented by-
1) Subhash Kursunge 4) Shreya Vairagkar
2) Abhijeet Lad 5) Deepak Gaikwad
3) Pawan Kangane
 RELEVANCE OF TOPIC TO MBA

 MBA is a foundation for corporate leadership

 Management is leading people to get work done

 Manager should know the different style of

leadership

 And also employ right style for specific problem

 This case study explain those leadership style

with practical examples
 CONTENT
 Introduction

 Emotional intelligence

 Authoritative style & Coercive style

 Affiliative style & Democratic style

 Pacesetting style & Coaching style

 Conclusion
 INTRODUCTION

 Leadership is art of motivating group of people to

achieve a common goal

 Job of leader is getting the best result

 Effective leadership is implementing right strategy as per

situation

 Leadership has six different styles as per given research

 We will come across this styles in this presentation

Emotional intelligence
Emotional Self Awareness

Self Awareness
Self assessment

Self control

Initiative
Self confidence Trustworthiness

Self Management Achievement

Orientation Conscientiousness
Empathy
Adaptability

Organizational
Social Awareness Awareness
Visionary
Teamwork & Leadership
Collaboration Influence
Service orientation

Building
Developing others
Social Skill Bonds
Conflict
Communication
management
Change
catalyst
AUTHORITATIVE STYLE COERCIVE STYLE

Mobilizes people toward a Demands immediate compliance

vision

Do what I tell you

Come with me
Drive to achieve, initiative, self-
Self-confidence, empathy, control
change catalyst

Work best in crisis, to kick start

Best at delivering new turn-around
vision & clear direction

Overall impact on work climate

Most strongly positive is negative
 AFFILIATIVE STYLE DEMOCRATIC STYLE

Creates harmony & Forges consensus through

build emotional bonds participation

People come first “What do you think ?”

Collaboration, team
Empathy, relationships leadership &
& communications communication

Works best to heal rifts Works best at building

& mitigate stress consensus & getting inputs

Overall impact -Positive Overall impact -Positive

 PACESETTING STYLE COACHING STYLE

High standards for Develop people for future

performance

“ Do as I do, now !” “Try this !”

Consciousness, drive to Developing others, empathy,

achieve , initiative self-awareness

Works best to get quick result Works best in development of

employee
Overall impact - Negative Overall impact - Positive
 CONCLUSION
Each style of leadership is rich & scarce of certain
components of E.I.

Mastering a single style is not adequate

So Leader has to recognize E.I. components he lacks and

get to master it

Leadership is not exact science

Leader must apply right style at right time in right measure

 REFERENCE
http://www.mchnutritionpartners.ucla.edu/sites/de
fault/files/images/HBRLeadershipGetsResults1.pdf

CONTRIBUTION OF TEAM MEMBERS

 Abhijeet Lad (18102) - Search & selection of case study

 Pawan Kangane (18103) - Initial draft of PPT

Shreya Vairagkar (18104)

 Subhash Kursunge (18101) - Final editing & finishing

Deepak Gaikwad (18105)

THANK YOU