Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cross-Cult. 5lectures &5 Seminars
Cross-Cult. 5lectures &5 Seminars
Syllabus:
5 lectures
5 seminars
1 module paper
Credit
Lectures in Cross-Cultural Studies
Lecture One. Part One.
- What is culture?
Individual differences in C. – the degree to which
people adopt and engage in the attitudes, values,
beliefs, and behaviors. If you act in accordance with
these values and behaviors, then that C. resides in
you; if not – you do not share that culture.
Are we similar or different
1What are we similar in? Give your reasons.
2What are we different in? Give examples.
3Culture as the basis of cross-cultural studies.
What is culture?
• Goody E.N.
Introduction.Questions and
politeness: Strategies in social
interaction. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 1987.
1 – 5.
• Leech J. Politeness Phenomena.
Principles of Pragmatics. London:
Longmans, 1983. 30 – 45.
• Messenger B. The Complete Guide
to Etiquette. London: Evans
Brothers, 1966. P. 7 -17, 39 – 81,
132.
• Following Kant, Grice related four categories of Quantity, Quality,
Relation and Manner to respective four maxims and submaxims
(rules) of conversation.
• 1. The category of Quantity concerns the quantity of information to
be provided, and it
• subsumes the following maxims:
• 1.1.” Make your contribution as informative as is required for the
current purposes of the exchange”;
• 1.2. “Do not make your contribution more informative than is
required”.
• 2.The category of Quality relates to the truth (and its justification) of
the information:
• 2.1. “Do not say what you believe to be false”;
• 2.2. “Do not say that for which you lack adequate evidence”.
• 3. The category of Relation concerns the relation of each participant to
the purpose of the conversation. Under this category Grice places one
maxim:
• “Be relevant”.
• 4. The category of Manner concerns the modality of conversational
participation.
• 4.1. “Avoid obscurity of expression”
• 4.2. “Avoid ambiguity”
• 4.3. “Be brief (avoid unnecessary prolixity)”
• 4.4. “Be orderly”
Are the maxims always
observed?
• Provide situations when interactional
maxims cannot be violated.
• Provide situations when interactional
maxims are violated/flouted when
infringement of one of the maxims takes
place. Which can be the situations?
Guess what kind of violation takes
place in the following example:
Prof. to a student: “ Please make clear all
the elements of your answer to my
question, because I don’t know the
answer”.
A case of “white lie” (e.g. a doctor’s talk
to a patient or a compliment to a plain
girl)
• (At the bus station) The driver to
the passengers: “The bus goes to
the depot”. – “Which depot?” –
The fourth. ( The driver keeps
aloof. Here we have the violation
of … )
• (In the public transport a girl cries
out to a woman in the far end of
it): “Mom, here is a vacant place”.
The Principle of Politeness
(by J. Leech)
• In interpersonal interaction –
connection with “face”. Face
Saving theory.
• Brown and Levinson make the
following assumptions: All
competent adult members of a
society have a “face”, the public
self-image that every member
wants to claim for himself,
consisting of two related aspects:
positive and negative face.
• Positive face: the positive self-image
or personality claimed by
communicators (the desire that self-
image be appreciated or approved,
the want of a person to be desirable,
to be ratified, understood, approved
of , liked or admired ).
• Negative face: the basic claim to
territories, personal preserves, rights
to nondistraction, i.e. to freedom of
action and freedom from imposition.
In other words – negative face: the
want of every adult member to be
unimpeded by others.
Positive Politeness
8. Joke
9. Assert or presuppose knowledge
of and concern for H’s wants
10. Offer, promise
11. Be optimistic
12. Include both Speaker and Hearer in
the activity
13. Give (or ask for) reasons
14. Assume or assert reciprocity
15. Give gifts to Hearer (goods
sympathy, understanding,
cooperation)
Negative politeness
Positive politeness
Negative politeness
• In Anglo-Saxon and other Northern
cultures the normal speaking distance
between interlocutors is an arm’s length
(even longer). In Southern countries (Italy
etc.) and Slavic culture the distance is
closer.
• E.g. (A scholarly conference in Urbana-
Champaigne.Two professors (Ukr. & Am.) are speaking
during the tea-break). Ukr.:
unconsciously
trying to move closer, American:
unconsciously trying to step back. The
Ukrainian may think of the American as
haughty, while American may feel the
Ukrainian interlocutor to be rather
intrusive. (looks like a dance – moving
forward and backward)
• When communicating we usually keep a
comfortable distance called differently –
“personal space”, “interpersonal distance”,
“comfort zone”, etc. Distance depends on the
nature of relationship and social interaction.
Americans have established the following
distances:
• Intimate distance (An emotionally charged zone)
• Personal distance (from one to four feet. Used
for informal contact // friends)
• Social distance (from four to twelve feet for
interaction with acquaintances and strangers.
Used in business meetings, classrooms, and
impersonal social affairs)
• Public distance (from twelve to twenty-five feet.
A cool interaction distance used for one-way
communication from speaker to audience.
Necessitates a louder voice and stylized gestures)
• Differences in behavior of Slavic
and Western representatives
standing in line.
We tend to stay very close to each
other, to the counter, ticket desk,
ATM (Automatic Teller Machine)
to withdraw money etc. The
Americans/British – at two arms’
length and never approach the
counter until the person at the
counter, ATM etc. has left it.
Linguistic distancing
Issues
1. The notion of competence.
2. Linguistic/grammar competence.
3. Communicative competence
4. Metacommunicative competence
5. Two types of behavior: verbal &
nonverbal
Literature to Lecture
Three
• Issues:
1. The notion of communicative
style.
2. British communicative styles.
3. American communicative styles.
4. Differences between British &
American communicative styles.
Literature to Lecture 5
indifference to any-
body but
themselves
A List of Russian Traits as
Described by Americans
Positive traits
Negative traits
1.culture, erudition snobbery,
supermicism
2.Ability to survive no respect
for personal
space &
privacy
3.Hospitality, honesty self-
depriciation
4.Friendly & open if mean,
pushy when they
they know you don’t know
you
5.Faith & loyalty to difficult to
say ‘no’ to
friends them
6.Generocity sexism
7.Friends are not afraid men
carrying things for
to say what they think (sexism)
8.Helpfulness, insistence
that their
hospitality way is the
right way
9. Warmth, down-to earth, prejudiced
strait-forwardness
10. Modesty ‘I’m better than you’
attitude
11.Love of culture, music, do not like to take
art, land, adaptation risks with money,
feelings, thoughts,
not hospitable if
they
don’t know you
12. Interested in you can take it far &
invade your
emotionally & space
physically
13.Loyalty to each other lack of outlook (no
plans or goals)
Stereotypes about
Americans
Differences in approaches, values &
expectations between people with different
cultural backgrounds have lead to many
failures. Miscommunication across cultures
is usually the most important cause of cross-
cultural problems in multinational relations.
Don’t believe all of the stereotypes you may
have heard about Americans. Even the ones
that are true in general may not be true
about individuals. Although Americans tend
to be louder and more boisterous than other
people, many are quiet & polite. Some
people may be intolerant and xenophobic,
but most will be pleasant & welcoming
Seminars
Seminar 1. Cross-Cultural
Studies
Questions & tasks
1. The subject of cross-cultural studies.
2. Aims pursued by cross-cultural studies.
3. The British / Americans / Ukrainians
viewed cross-culturally.
4. Behavioral models of the contrasted
cultures
5. Attitude to time & space
6. Attitude to silence. Small talk
7. Write down a project for 3-4 pages
about your experience of talking to
foreigners.
8. Write down the project “Why should I
study cultures to know languages?”
minar 2. Moral Concepts Viewed Cross-Cult
Issues for discussions
1. Friendliness vs. friendship
2. Compare Americans and the British. Who of them is
universally perceived as friendly, informal, easy-going.
3. Which of the learned cultures are reserved, formal,
tacit & friendly. Comment on your answer. Give
reasons.
4. Give arguments of different approaches to
understanding
the concept FRIENDSHIP: for Americans: an
acquaintance = a friend; for them three days of
communication are enough to call a person a friend;
for Ukrainians – these are different concepts:
acquaintance – ‘a short-time, not close relationship’;
friend - ‘a life-long close relationship’. Give examples
to prove this.
5. Make notes of Ter-Minasova’s book The War and
Peace of Languages & Cultures. (in Rus. Война и мир
языков и культур. М.: Астрель, 2017. 286 с.)
• Discussing issues and writing projects on the
following:
a) Americans give “a friend” a “loose” meaning
as compared to Ukrainians. It is quantitative
rather than qualitative type of involvement.
b) “To have a steady boy/girl friend” is very
important to Am. college students.
Relationships define sexuality, and so people
who don’t have mates are assumed to be
homosexual or weird”. Prove that Ukrainian
students think otherwise.
c) To have friends and mates means to be social
& friendly. In contrast, it is not viewed as
weird not to have a lot of friends and dates in
Ukraine. But if Americans have a “true”
friend, they call him/her a “best friend” or
“close friend”. Write whether it is true to fact.
d) Courtesy and respect. How can you
account for the fact that in Ukraine a
woman expects a man to open the door
for her, help her to put on a coat. Which
are other actions that a man should
display towards a woman to mean
‘respect’. Americans not doing so are
considered as not courteous. American
females consider these acts disrespectful.
They don’t want men to take care of them,
they wish to be independent and want
respect not just because of their gender,
but because they are valuable members of
society.
Give your arguments to support or reject
such attitude
• Independence. Say if you agree to the
following:
• For Americans: self-governing, self-
reliance, choice, respect of personal
boundaries, informality, security, self-
determination, self-control, individual
responsibility, individual success,
punctuality, friendliness.
• For Ukrainians: involvement (close
connection), hospitality, generosity,
trust, concern, sincerity, directness,
intimacy, loyalty, emotional
commitment, spontaneity, flexibility,
inner freedom for feeling and thoughts
pertaining to morality
Seminar 3.Morality vs
Plagiarism
Discuss the following statements:
1. An important aspect of academic
morality in the USA is the attitude
towards what is called cheating in the
classroom during quizzes, tests and
exams. Using ’cribs’ & other
unauthorized materials and trying to
pass them off as your own, all other
cases of plagiarism when a student
copies whole passages or pages from a
coursebook or a scholarly book
without citing the source – all these &
other similar kinds of behaviour are
considered as academic cheating.
What is your attitude to this ?
Morality vs Plagiarism
(continuation)
2. If in Ukrainian culture plagiarism was
looked upon as a minor offense, in
American culture it is treated as a major
offense – in fact a crime. It is absolutely
inadmissible. A student found guilty in
plagiarism, of trying to find out
beforehand the exact tasks or questions to
be answered during tests or exams, of
using cribs, or of giving promts to other
students will face very serious penalties.
At best s(he) will be suspended, but quite
often dismissed from the university for
good. A special record will be made of
her/his misdemeanor that may prove a
serious obstacle in all the future career. Is
this a hard punishment to your mind?
Classroom behaviour