This document summarizes a presentation on the dynamics of journalistic privileges in India. It discusses how journalistic privilege protects reporters from having to name confidential sources in court proceedings in order to maintain free flow of information and protect sensitive sources. It outlines the need for privileges to avoid contempt charges and difficult choices when courts order source names. The presentation also examines journalistic privileges under Indian law and constitutional provisions, as well as how the judiciary in India has interpreted these privileges. It concludes by suggesting a qualified privilege model may strike the best balance between press freedoms and court functions.
This document summarizes a presentation on the dynamics of journalistic privileges in India. It discusses how journalistic privilege protects reporters from having to name confidential sources in court proceedings in order to maintain free flow of information and protect sensitive sources. It outlines the need for privileges to avoid contempt charges and difficult choices when courts order source names. The presentation also examines journalistic privileges under Indian law and constitutional provisions, as well as how the judiciary in India has interpreted these privileges. It concludes by suggesting a qualified privilege model may strike the best balance between press freedoms and court functions.
This document summarizes a presentation on the dynamics of journalistic privileges in India. It discusses how journalistic privilege protects reporters from having to name confidential sources in court proceedings in order to maintain free flow of information and protect sensitive sources. It outlines the need for privileges to avoid contempt charges and difficult choices when courts order source names. The presentation also examines journalistic privileges under Indian law and constitutional provisions, as well as how the judiciary in India has interpreted these privileges. It concludes by suggesting a qualified privilege model may strike the best balance between press freedoms and court functions.
TOPIC: DYNAMICS OF JOURNALISTIC PRIVILEGES – A STUDY PRESENTED BY: Ritika Sahni PRESENTED TO: MR.Litson Stephen INTRODUCTION
• The protection of journalists’ sources of information is a basic
condition for both the full exercise of journalistic work and the right of the public to be informed on matters of public concern.
• Journalists’ privilege is the right of a journalist to refuse to divulge
sources of confidential information.
• It shields the reporters from being compelled to name confidential
sources in court proceedings. NEED FOR JOURNALISTIC PRIVILEGES
• Free flow of information without any interruptions.
• Protect the secret or sensitive information. • To maintain the anonymity. • To avoid the difficult choice when a court orders them to produce the names of sources, other confidential information, or other materials. • To avoid the contempt. • To protect the identity of confidential sources. JOURNALISTIC PRIVILEGES IN INDIA
• Confidential information.
• The legal obligation to give evidence and exceptions to it.
i. Constitutional privilege ii. Indian Evidence Act, 1872 THE STAND OF JUDICIARY
• Jai Prakash Aggarwal v. Vishambhar Dutt Sharma and Ors.
• Dr. S. Krishna Rao v. Ushodaya Publications
CONCLUSION
• It was suggested to the Congress that the need for an absolute
privilege may fail the function of the courts and that a qualified privilege might be the best. • According to Professor Stone there can be a rule that limits the privilege i. to prevent an imminent and grave crime or threat to the national security; ii. where the disclosure is unlawful. THANKYOU