Spinal Trauma2

You might also like

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 27

Spinal Trauma

Spinal trauma may involve injury to the spinal •


.column, spinal cord, or both
Over 50% o spinal injuries occur in the ■ •
cervical spine with the remainder being
divided between the thoracic spine, the
thoracolumbar junction, and the lumbosacral
.region
There are seven cervical, 12 thoracic, five lumbar, five sacral, and four •
.coccygeal vertebrae

.The cervical spine is the region most vulnerable to injury •

The thoracic spine is relatively protected due to limited mobility from support of the •
rib cage (T1–T10); however, the spinal canal through which
,the spinal cord traverses is relatively narrow in this region. Therefore •
.when injuries to this region do occur, they usually have devastating results •

The thoracolumbar junction (T11–L1) is a fairly vulnerable region as it is •


the area between the relatively inflexible thoracic region and the flexible •
.lumbar region •

The lumbosacral region (L2 and below) contains the region of the spinal •
canal below which the spinal cord proper ends and the cauda equina begins •
:Mechanisms suspicious for spinal injury •
.Diving ■ •
.Fall from > 10 feet ■ •
Injury above level of shoulders ■ •
.)cervical spine( •
.Electrocution ■ •
High-speed motor vehicle crash ■ •
.)MVC( •
Rugby or football injury ■ •
Spinal injuries can generally be classified •
:based on
Fracture/dislocation type (mechanism, ■ •
.stable vs. unstable)
Level of neurological (sensory and motor) ■ •
.and bony involvement
Severity (complete vs. incomplete spinal ■ •
.cord disability)
:Complete vs. incomplete •
Complete spinal cord injuries demonstrate no •
preservation of neurologic function distal to the level of
injury. Therefore, any sensorimotor function
.below the level of injury constitutes an incomplete injury

Sacral sparing :refers to perianal sensation, voluntary •


anal sphincter contraction,or voluntary toe flexion, and
.is a sign of an incomplete spinal cord injury
The exam should include testing o the three readily assessable long •
:spinal tracts

:Corticospinal tract (CST) •


.Located in the posterolateral aspect of the spinal cord ■ •
.Responsible or ipsilateral motor function ■ •
.Tested via voluntary muscle contraction ■ •

:Spinothalamic tract (STT) •


.Located in the anteriolateral aspect of the spinal cord ■ •
Responsible or contralateral pain and temperature sensation and ■ •
.tested as such •

Posterior columns
: •
.Located in the posterior aspect o the spinal cord ■ •
Responsible or ipsilateral position and vibratory sense and some ■ •
.light touch sensation •
Tested using a tuning fork and position sense of the fingers and toes ■ •
Spinal Cord Syndromes
:Anterior cord syndrome-1 •
Pattern seen with injury to the anterior portion of the ■ •
spinal cord or with compression of the anterior spinal
.arteries (artery o Adamkiewicz)

Involves full or partial loss of bilateral pain and ■ •


temperature sensation (STT)and paraplegia (CST) with
.preservation of posterior column function
Often seen with flexion injuries ■ •

.Carries a poor prognosis ■ •


:Brown–Séquard syndrome-2 •
Pattern seen with hemisection of the spinal ■ •
cord usually secondary to a penetrating injury,
but may also be seen with disk protrusion,
.hematoma or tumor
Consists o ipsilateral loss of motor function •
(CST) and posterior columnfunction, with
contralateral loss of pain and temperature
.sensation
:Central cord syndrome-3

Pattern seen with injury to the central area of the spinal cord often in •
.patients with a preexisting narrowing of the spinal canal •

Usually seen with hyperextension injuries, its cause is usually attribute •
to buckling of the ligamentum flavum into the cord and/or an ischemic •
.etiology in the distribution of branches of the anterior spinal artery •

Characterized by weakness greater in the upper extremities than the •
.lower extremities, and distal worse than proximal •

Has a better prognosis than the other partial cord syndromes with a
characteristic pattern of recovery (lower extremity recovery progressing upward •
to upper extremity recovery, then the hands recover strength
:Manegment of spinal cord injuries
Always start with the ABCs of trauma resuscitation-1 •
. •
.Maintain spinal immobilization throughout the resuscitation-2 •

.Estimate level of neurologic dysfunction during the secondary survey -3 •

.Obtain appropriate diagnostic studies -4 •

.Establish early neurosurgical consultation -5 •

If blunt spinal cord injury is diagnosed, begin high-dose methylprednisone -6 •


.)must be given within 8 hours of injury and not for penetrating injury ( •
Loading dose of 30 mg/kg over 15 minutes during hour 1, followed by a -7 •
continuous infusion of 5.5 mg/kg/hr; the infusion is continued for 23 hours •
if the bolus is given within 3 hours of injury, or for 47 hours if the bolus is •
.given within 8 hours of injury •
:Cervical spine films are indicated for •
.Tenderness along cervical spine ■ •
.Neurologic deficit ■ •
.Good mechanism of injury ■ •
.Presence of distracting injury ■ •
Patients with altered sensorium ■ •
Neurugenic shock
A state of vasomotor instability resulting from •
impairment of the descending sympathetic
pathways in the spinal cord, or simply a loss of
tone. sympathetic

Signs and symptoms: Flaccid paralysis, ■ •


hypotension, bradycardia, cutaneous
vasodilation, and a normal to wide pulse •
.pressure
:Spinal Shock
State of flaccidity and loss of reflexes •
occurring immediately after spinal cord injury
Loss of visceral and peripheral autonomic ■ •
control with uninhibited parasympathetic
.impulses •
May last from seconds to weeks, and does ■ •
.not signify permanent spinal cord damage
Long-term prognosis cannot be postulated ■ •
.until spinal shock has resolved
Cervical Spine Fractures And
Dislocation
:General •
As mentioned above, these injuries are usually •
classified on the basis of mechanism(flexion,
extension, compression, rotation, or
combination of these)location, and/or
.stability
Imaging •
Four views of the cervical spine are obtained ■ •
(lateral, anteroposterior,oblique, and
.odontoid)
A lateral view alone will miss 10% of cervical ■ •
.spine injuries
: Jefferson Fracture •
.C1 (atlas) burst fracture ■ •
.Most common C1 fracture ■ •
Consists of a fracture of both the anterior and ■ •
.posterior rings of C1
Results from axial loading such as when the ■ •
patient falls directly on his or her head or
.something falls on the patient’s head
Consider all C1 fractures unstable even though ■ •
.most are not associated with spinal cord injury
: odontoid Fracture •

Type 1: Involves only the tip of the dens ■ •


.(stable)
Type 2: Involves only the base of the dens ■ •
.(unstable)
Type 3: Fracture through the base and body ■ •
.of C2 (generally unstable)
: Hangman’s Fracture •
Fracture of both C2 pedicles (“posterior ■ •
.elements”)
Usually due to a hyperextension mechanism ■ •
Unstable fracture; however, often not ■ •
associated with spinal cord injury because the
spinal canal is at its widest through C2
: Clay shoveler’s Fracture •
Usually a flexion injury resulting in an ■ •
avulsion of the tip o the spinous
process (C7 > C6 > T1) •
.May also result from a direct blow ■ •
:Thoracic Spine Fractures
Most injuries occur at the junction between the relatively •
fixed upper thoracic spine and the mobile thoracolumbar
.region (T10–L5)
The spinal canal in this region is narrow and the blood ■ •
supply to this region of spinal cord is in a watershed area
Most thoracic spine fractures are caused by hyperflexion ■ •
leading to a wedge or compression fracture of the
vertebral body
Most fractures/dislocations in this area are considered ■ •
stable because of the surrounding normal bony thorax;
however, neurologic impairment resulting from injuries in
.this area is often complete
Lumbar Spine Fractures And Dislocation

.Results from axial loading and flexion •


.Potentially unstable •
.Neurologic injury is uncommon •
:Disraction or Seat -Belt Injury •
.Frequently referred to as a Chance fracture ■ •
Horizontal fracture through the vertebral ■ •
body, spinous processes, laminae,pedicles,
.and tearing of the posterior spinous ligament
Caused by an acceleration–deceleration ■ •
injury of a mobile person moving forward into
.a fixed seat belt
Thoracic Outlet Syndrome
Subclavian artery/vein and brachial plexus •
pass through a space defined by the clavicle
.and first rib (thoracic outlet)
Vascular compromise is more common than ■ •
neurologic, Adson’s sign—loss of radial pulse
.on abduction and external rotation of the arm
Can present with T1 sensory loss, wasting of ■ •
thenar muscles
Rotating head away from affected side with •
elevation of arm producing paresthesia/pain is
suggestive of neurologic TOS. Concomitant
reduction of radial pulse suggests vascular
.TOS
:Etiologies •
Fibrous band compressing C8/T1 roots (inferior-1 •
.trunk)
”.Elongated C7 transverse process—“cervical rib-2 •

:Treatment •
Surgical lysis of fibrous band or removal of C7 •
transverse process by either transaxillary or
.supraclavicular approach to thoracic outlet

You might also like