Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Theories of Language Acquisition2
The Theories of Language Acquisition2
Acquisition
Mommy
!
I’m right
here
I’m Can I
I’m How are
Hello fine! help
Hungry you? What’s
you?
up?
(Rathus, 2006)
Other Characteristics of Children’s
Speech in the Pre-school Years
Overregulization-Using regular rules (such as -ed
and -s) to change a word that is irregular (such
as go or buy).
Fast-mapping-Quickly defining a word to
increase a child’s vocabulary.
Whole-object assumption-The idea that a word
refers to an entire thing and not just a piece of
the whole.
Contrast assumption/mutual exclusivity-The idea
that things can only have one name, and that
word cannot mean anything else.
(Rathus, 2006)
Two Stages of Language
Acquisition:
Hell Hola
o
Language is a human trait:
It separates our species from other animals.
Language helps us to survive as a group
and maintain our culture. Human
language is effective and economical,
using symbols to represent both the
physical and nonphysical; single items and
whole categories; fixed states and
changing processes; fiction and nonfiction,
truth and lies.
(Zhou, 2003)
PSYCHOLINGUISTICS
The concept that children learn
language through both
environment and innate
abilities.
Rathus, 2006
Language is made of four
subsystems:
• Phonology: the use of phonemes, or the smallest speech sound
unit with a unique meaning. Phonology uses these building blocks
to create syllables and words. “Meat” uses three phonemes /m/, /ē/,
and /t/ to form one syllable.
• Semantics: makes language meaningful. Lexical semantics is the
word meaning and grammatical semantics is the meaning derived
from morphemes, or smallest meaning units.
• Grammar: includes morphology and syntax. Morphology are the
rules to form words (i.e. prefixes, suffixes, compounds). Syntax are
the rules for word order in sentences.
• Pragmatics: are the practical aspects of communication, involving
speech registers, intended meanings, polite expressions,
conversation rules, clearness and clarification.
(Zhou, 2003)
The views are diverse:
Some believe that language development follows one universal path
with stage-like shifts, propelled by innate factors such as cooing,
babbling, using gestures, first words, telegraphic speech, vocabulary
growth spurts, overregularization, vocabulary growth, sentence
complexity, and subtle usages learned via formal education.
(Zhou, 2003)
Cecelia Shore, in her 1995 book, Individual
Differences in Language Development , analyzed
the different pathways of the two styles:
•Phonology: Holistic babies listen to intonation, take risks at trying larger sound
chunks. Analytic babies are phoneme-oriented, listening to distinct speech
patterns, articulation is clearer.
•Semantics: vocabulary size and type varies. Children are known as either having
referential vocabulary (labeling objects), or expressive vocabulary (personal-social
phrases as "don't do dat")
•Grammar: Analytic children use a nominal approach and telegraphic grammar,
while holistic children use a pronominal approach and pivot-open grammar.
Pragmatics: Children may differ in their understanding of the primary function of
language. Referential children appreciate the informative function of language, are
more object-oriented, declarative, with a low variety of speech acts. Expressive
children appreciate the interpersonal function of language, are more person-
oriented, imperative, with a high variety of speech acts.
2. At the biological level, babies seem to prefer the human voice and human face
to other sounds and figures. The developmental sequence is universal
worldwide. Deaf children coo and babble at the same times as hearing children.
Although the language environment is chaotic, it only takes a child 4-5 years to
speak their mother tongue as an adult without overt, systematic teaching.
a. infant brains respond asymmetrically to language versus nonlanguage
sounds. Studies confirm left hemisphere language specialization including
Broca's and Wernicke's areas.
B. Criticisms:
1. Universal grammar doesn't explain grammatical diversity in all human
languages.
2. Growth spurts in the brain do not correspond to language development in a
synchronous manner.
3. Nativist Perspective doesn't cover social interaction, contextual factors,
pragmatic usage, subtle expressions, speech acts and styles. (Zhou, 2003)
Interactionist Theories
Try to bring nature and nurture together. Recognize reciprocal influences:
facilitating/constraining, dependence/modification, and factors from
biological, cognitive, linguistic, and social domains.
B. Not supported:
1. cognitive psychology
a. grammar deficits as a result of global cognitive reduction
b. Broca's aphasia with comprehension impairment and grammar impairment
c. semantically related word substitutions in Wernicke's aphasia
d. plasticity helping to adapt for damaged areas
e. inseparability of phonology, syntax, pragmatics
(Zhou, 2003)
Connectionist Model: an info-
processing model
A. Strength of connections of neural network
1. neurons at work, just like simultaneous
processing of a computer, results in self-
regulated adjustments at the connections.
2. Learner has trial-and-error period that gives
rise to stage-like progressions.
3. input is random, and rules are not
programmed, yet language occurs.
4. This model emphasizes learning, though not
the tabula rasa assumption.
(Zhou, 2003)
Dynamic Systems Model
An ecosystem with heuristic principles modeled
after the biological system in general and
evolutionary system in particular.
A. multiple "species" (i.e. vocabulary and grammar
rules) in interrelated connections:
1.outcomes depend on changes of components
in their mutual dependency in competition for
limited internal and external resources.
(Zhou, 2003)
Thanks for viewing
our presentation.
We hope you learned
a lot about language
acquisition and the
various theories
Bibliography
David, T. (2004, September 16). Theories about how young children acquire and develop
language. Nursery World. Retrieved June 24, 2007, from
http://www.literacytrust.org.uk/talktoyourbaby/theories.html
Holtgraves, T.M. (2002). Language as Social Action: Social Psychology and Language Use. Mahwah,
NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
KQED: KidsWatch. (2005). Articles About Cognitive Development. Retrieved June 21, 2007, from:
http://www.kqed.org/topics/family/parents/kidswatch/articles/cognitivearticles.jsp
Rathus, S. A. (2006). Childhood: Voyages in Development (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson/Wadsworth.
Shore, C.M. (1995). Individual Differences in Language Development. Vol. 7 in R. Plomin (Ed.) Individual
Differences and Development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Wasserman, L.H. (2007). The correlation between brain development, language acquisition, and cognition.
Early Childhood Education Journal, 34 (6), 415.
Zhou, Ling-Yi. (2003). Language. In Magill’s Encyclopedia of Social Sciences: Psychology (pp.876-882).
Salem Press.