Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Statistics For Business and Economics: Anderson Sweeney Williams
Statistics For Business and Economics: Anderson Sweeney Williams
Statistics For Business and Economics: Anderson Sweeney Williams
and Economics
Anderson Sweeney Williams
Slides by
John Loucks
St. Edward’s University
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied
Slide
1
or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Chapter 10, Part A
Inference About Means and Proportions
with Two Populations
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied
Slide
2
or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Inferences About the Difference Between
Two Population Means: s 1 and s 2 Known
Interval Estimation of m 1 – m 2
Hypothesis Tests About m 1 – m 2
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied
Slide
3
or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Estimating the Difference Between
Two Population Means
Let 1 equal the mean of population 1 and 2 equal
the mean of population 2.
The difference between the two population means is
1 - 2.
To estimate 1 - 2, we will select a simple random
sample of size n1 from population 1 and a simple
random sample of size n2 from population 2.
Let x1 equal the mean of sample 1 and x2 equal the
mean of sample 2.
The point estimator of the difference between the
means of the populations 1 and 2 is x1 x2.
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied
Slide
4
or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Sampling Distribution of x1 x2
Expected Value
E ( x1 x2 ) 1 2
12 22
x1 x2
n1 n2
12 22
x1 x2 z / 2
n1 n2
where:
1 - is the confidence coefficient
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied
Slide
6
or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Interval Estimation of 1 - 2:
s 1 and s 2 Known
Example: Par, Inc.
Par, Inc. is a manufacturer of golf equipment and
has developed a new golf ball that has been
designed to provide “extra distance.”
In a test of driving distance using a mechanical
driving device, a sample of Par golf balls was
compared with a sample of golf balls made by Rap,
Ltd., a competitor. The sample statistics appear on
the next slide.
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied
Slide
7
or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Interval Estimation of 1 - 2:
s 1 and s 2 Known
Example: Par, Inc.
Sample #1 Sample #2
Par, Inc. Rap, Ltd.
Sample Size 120 balls 80 balls
Sample Mean 275 yards 258 yards
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied
Slide
8
or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Interval Estimation of 1 - 2:
s 1 and s 2 Known
Example: Par, Inc.
Let us develop a 95% confidence interval estimate
of the difference between the mean driving distances of
the two brands of golf ball.
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied
Slide
9
or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Estimating the Difference Between
Two Population Means
Population 1 Population 2
Par, Inc. Golf Balls Rap, Ltd. Golf Balls
m11 = mean driving m22 = mean driving
distance of Par distance of Rap
golf balls golf balls
m1 – m2 = difference between
the mean distances
Simple random sample Simple random sample
of n11 Par golf balls of n22 Rap golf balls
x11 = sample mean distance x22 = sample mean distance
for the Par golf balls for the Rap golf balls
x1 - x2 = Point Estimate of m1 – m2
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied
Slide
10
or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Point Estimate of 1 - 2
Point estimate of 1 - 2 = x1 x2
= 275 - 258
= 17 yards
where:
1 = mean distance for the population
of Par, Inc. golf balls
2 = mean distance for the population
of Rap, Ltd. golf balls
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied
Slide
11
or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Interval Estimation of 1 - 2:
1 and 2 Known
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied
Slide
12
or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Hypothesis Tests About m 1 - m 2:
s 1 and s 2 Known
Hypotheses
H0: 1 2 D0 H0: 1 2 D0 H0 : 1 2 D0
Ha : 1 2 D0 Ha : 1 2 D0 Ha : 1 2 D0
Left-tailed Right-tailed Two-tailed
Test Statistic
( x1 x2 ) D0
z
12 22
n1 n2
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied
Slide
13
or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Hypothesis Tests About m 1 - m 2:
s 1 and s 2 Known
Example: Par, Inc.
Can we conclude, using a = .01, that the
mean driving distance of Par, Inc. golf balls is
greater than the mean driving distance of Rap, Ltd.
golf balls?
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied
Slide
14
or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Hypothesis Tests About m 1 - m 2:
s 1 and s 2 Known
p –Value and Critical Value Approaches
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied
Slide
15
or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Hypothesis Tests About m 1 - m 2:
s 1 and s 2 Known
p –Value and Critical Value Approaches
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied
Slide
16
or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Hypothesis Tests About m 1 - m 2:
s 1 and s 2 Known
p –Value Approach
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied
Slide
17
or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Hypothesis Tests About m 1 - m 2:
s 1 and s 2 Known
Critical Value Approach
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied
Slide
19
or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Interval Estimation of 1 - 2:
s 1 and s 2 Unknown
When s 1 and s 2 are unknown, we will:
• use the sample standard deviations s1 and s2
as estimates of s 1 and s 2 , and
• replace za/2 with ta/2.
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied
Slide
20
or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Interval Estimation of 1 - 2:
s 1 and s 2 Unknown
Interval Estimate
s12 s22
x1 x2 t / 2
n1 n2
1 2
n1 n2
df
2 2 2 2
1 s1 1 s2
n1 1 n1 n2 1 n2
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied
Slide
21
or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Difference Between Two Population Means:
s 1 and s 2 Unknown
Example: Specific Motors
Specific Motors of Detroit has developed a new
Automobile known as the M car. 24 M cars and 28 J
cars (from Japan) were road tested to compare miles-
per-gallon (mpg) performance. The sample statistics
are shown on the next slide.
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied
Slide
22
or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Difference Between Two Population Means:
s 1 and s 2 Unknown
Example: Specific Motors
Sample #1 Sample #2
M Cars J Cars
24 cars 28 cars Sample Size
29.8 mpg 27.3 mpg Sample Mean
2.56 mpg 1.81 mpg Sample Std. Dev.
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied
Slide
23
or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Difference Between Two Population Means:
s 1 and s 2 Unknown
Example: Specific Motors
Let us develop a 90% confidence interval estimate
of the difference between the mpg performances of
the two models of automobile.
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied
Slide
24
or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Point Estimate of m 1 - m 2
Point estimate of 1 - 2 = x1 x2
= 29.8 - 27.3
= 2.5 mpg
where:
1 = mean miles-per-gallon for the
population of M cars
2 = mean miles-per-gallon for the
population of J cars
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied
Slide
25
or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Interval Estimation of m 1 - m 2:
s 1 and s 2 Unknown
The degrees of freedom for ta/2 are:
2
(2.56) (1.81) 2 2
24 28
df 2 2
24.07 24
1 (2.56)2 1 (1.81)2
24 1 24 28 1 28
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied
Slide
26
or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Interval Estimation of m 1 - m 2:
s 1 and s 2 Unknown
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied
Slide
27
or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Hypothesis Tests About m 1 - m 2:
s 1 and s 2 Unknown
Hypotheses
H0: 1 2 D0 H0: 1 2 D0 H0 : 1 2 D0
Ha : 1 2 D0 Ha : 1 2 D0 Ha : 1 2 D0
Left-tailed Right-tailed Two-tailed
Test Statistic
( x1 x 2 ) D 0
t
s12 s 22
n1 n 2
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied
Slide
28
or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Hypothesis Tests About m 1 - m 2:
s 1 and s 2 Unknown
Example: Specific Motors
Can we conclude, using a .05 level of significance,
that the miles-per-gallon (mpg) performance of M cars
is greater than the miles-per-gallon performance of J
cars?
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied
Slide
29
or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Hypothesis Tests About m 1 - m 2:
s 1 and s 2 Unknown
p –Value and Critical Value Approaches
1. Develop the hypotheses.
H0: 1 - 2 < 0
Ha: 1 - 2 > 0
where:
1 = mean mpg for the population of M cars
2 = mean mpg for the population of J cars
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied
Slide
30
or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Hypothesis Tests About m 1 - m 2:
s 1 and s 2 Unknown
p –Value and Critical Value Approaches
2. Specify the level of significance. a = .05
( x1 x2 ) D0 (29.8 27.3) 0
t 4.003
s12 s22 (2.56) 2 (1.81) 2
n1 n2 24 28
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied
Slide
31
or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Hypothesis Tests About m 1 - m 2:
s 1 and s 2 Unknown
p –Value Approach
4. Compute the p –value.
The degrees of freedom for ta are:
2
(2.56) (1.81) 2 2
24 28
df 2 2
40.566 41
1 (2.56)2 1 (1.81)2
24 1 24 28 1 28
Because t = 4.003 > t.005 = 1.683, the p–value < .005.
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied
Slide
32
or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Hypothesis Tests About m 1 - m 2:
s 1 and s 2 Unknown
p –Value Approach
5. Determine whether to reject H0.
Because p–value < a = .05, we reject H0.
We are at least 95% confident that the miles-per-
gallon (mpg) performance of M cars is greater than
the miles-per-gallon performance of J cars?.
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied
Slide
33
or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Hypothesis Tests About m 1 - m 2:
s 1 and s 2 Unknown
Critical Value Approach
4. Determine the critical value and rejection rule.
For a = .05 and df = 41, t.05 = 1.683
Reject H0 if t > 1.683
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied
Slide
34
or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Inferences About the Difference Between
Two Population Means: Matched Samples
With a matched-sample design each sampled item
provides a pair of data values.
This design often leads to a smaller sampling error
than the independent-sample design because
variation between sampled items is eliminated as a
source of sampling error.
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied
Slide
35
or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Inferences About the Difference Between
Two Population Means: Matched Samples
Example: Express Deliveries
A Chicago-based firm has documents that must
be quickly distributed to district offices throughout
the U.S. The firm must decide between two delivery
services, UPX (United Parcel Express) and INTEX
(International Express), to transport its documents.
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied
Slide
36
or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Inferences About the Difference Between
Two Population Means: Matched Samples
Example: Express Deliveries
In testing the delivery times of the two services,
the firm sent two reports to a random sample of its
district offices with one report carried by UPX and
the other report carried by INTEX. Do the data on
the next slide indicate a difference in mean delivery
times for the two services? Use a .05 level of
significance.
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied
Slide
37
or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Inferences About the Difference Between
Two Population Means: Matched Samples
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied
Slide
39
or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Inferences About the Difference Between
Two Population Means: Matched Samples
p –Value and Critical Value Approaches
2. Specify the level of significance. a = .05
di ( 7 6... 5)
d 2. 7
n 10
2
( di d ) 76.1
sd 2. 9
n 1 9
d d 2.7 0
t 2.94
sd n 2.9 10
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied
Slide
40
or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Inferences About the Difference Between
Two Population Means: Matched Samples
p –Value Approach
4. Compute the p –value.
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied
Slide
41
or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Inferences About the Difference Between
Two Population Means: Matched Samples
Critical Value Approach
4. Determine the critical value and rejection rule.
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied
Slide
42
or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
End of Chapter 10
Part A
© 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied
Slide
43
or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.