Internship Report Presentation

Department of Civil Engineering

National Institute of Technology, Kurukshetra
Duration: 15th Jan 2020 – 31st May 2020

Presented by : Himank Chawla (11710003) Faculty Mentor: Dr. V.K. Arora

 HOST ORGANISATION
• ECONSTRUCT Design & Build Pvt Ltd is a leading consultancy and
contracting company in India that has executed construction work for
some of the most significant projects in the country.
• Their expertise across diverse infrastructure domains is evident through
the successful execution of various projects covering
• 1. Residential Construction - Ultra Modern Skyscrapers, Luxury Villas etc.
• 2 Commercial & Institutional Construction - IT Parks, Office Complexes,
Hotels, Shopping Malls, Schools, Hospitals etc
• 3. Road Construction - Earthwork & Paving, Electrification, Landscaping,
Widening.
• 4 Infrastructure Development - Underground water tanks, Overhead
water tanks, Septic tanks, Compound Walls, Landscape Design, Rainwater
harvesting tools
 MY ROLE IN THE ORGANIZATION
1. Time Duration:- 15th January- 31st March,2020
Department: Engineering Consultancy
Role: Work on Modelling and Design of Buildings and other infrastructural projects such
as Underground Water Tanks, Septic tanks, OHT.

2. Time Duration:- 1st April- 15th 31st May,2020

Department: Project Management and Planning Consultancy
Role: Civil inputs to Architect, IRR Analysis, Contract management, BOQ formation, Time
and Cost analysis(Scheduling)
SOFTWARES USED
 ENGINEERING CONSULTANCY
Understanding of
the Architectural Create Basic Mathematical
Design and Framing Plan Modelling
drawings

Analysis

WORKFLOW
Stability
Checks
Co-ordination
Design &
with Architect,
Execution at Detailing,
Contractors,
Site DBR
Other
consultants
 WORKFLOW EXPLANATION
• Create Basic Framing Plan- Studying Drawings and create plans using AutoCAD
• Mathematical Modelling- Basic Modelling, assigning loads(DL,LL, Earthquake, Wind,
Temp.) properties using Etabs
• Analysis- Static as well as Dynamic Analysis using Etabs
• Stability Checks- Drift, Deflection, Stress Limits using Etabs (Refernce Various IS Codes)
• Design & Detailing- Slabs, Beams, Columns, Shear walls, foundations, bracings etc.
using Etabs and CSI Detailing
• DBR- Design Basis Report to be submitted and approved from government
departments such as HRC, Mumbai and local municipality
• Co-ordination with Architect, Contractors, Other consultants- Providing Drawings for
execution and 3D Modelling, BOQ etc.
 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

STATIC DYNAMIC

Linear Non-Linear Linear Non-Linear

Geometric Material

Modal
P-Delta Buckling Response
Spectrum Time
Shrinkage History

Material
Creep
Strength
List of Projects Worked on
1. G+2 Residential Project, Tumkur, Karnataka
2. B+G+2 Office Space, Neelmangla
3. G+16 Commercial Building, Navi Mumbai( Flat Slab)
4. B+Podium+G+9 Residential Building, Mysuru (Tower+Non Tower)
5. Underground Water Tank, 2 lac liters
6. Bungee Jumping, Goa (Steel Structure)
7. G+27 Residential Project, Mumbai (Case Study)
PROJECT IMAGES
 CASE STUDY

RAUNAK RESIDENCY

VARTAKNAGAR, MUMBAI
 RAUNAK RESIDENCY

DETAILS OF THE BUILDING

Location Estimated
Vartak Nagar, Cost Of the Dimensions
Mumbai Project of
(Maharashtra ) 50 Crores Project

Plot Area No of flats Height of

2520 sqm 312 Nos building
84m
Built up Area Carpet area for
1430 sqm 1BHK Length of
315 Sqft building
Number of 61.50m
floors Carpet area for
G+27 2BHK Width of
520 Sqft building
22.4 m
ARCHITECTURAL FLOOR PLAN
ARCHITECTURAL 3D VIEW STRUCTURAL RENDER VIEW
 SECTION PROPERTIES
SHEAR WALL
Section Thickness(mm) Material
SHEAR WALL 1 300 M35

SHEAR WALL 2 600 M35

SHEAR WALL 3 450 M35

SHEAR WALL 4 750 M35

TRANSFER SLAB

Section Thickness (mm) Material

Transfer Slab 1 2000 M30
Transfer Slab 2 800 M30
BEAM PROPERTIES

Section Depth (mm) Width (mm) Material

Beam 1 600 300 M30
Beam 2 450 300 M30
Beam 3 750 300 M30

SLAB PROPERTIES

Section Thickness (mm) Material Modeling Type

Slab 1 & 2 150 M30 Shell-thin
Slab 3 200 M30 Shell-thin
Stair 200 M30 Membrane
 LOAD ASSIGNMENTS
SHELL LOADS

S. N TYPES OF LOADS DEAD LOAD (KN/m2) LIVE LOAD (KN/m2)

IS Code 875 Part 1 IS Code 875 Part 2

1. Gym area 2 4

2. Lobby 2 4

3. WC/Bath 3 2

4. Staircase 3 3

5. Terrace 3 2

6. O.H.T 21 0.75

7. LMR 9 0.75
 EARTHQUAKE PARAMETERS
PARAMETERS VALUE REMARK
Based on the IS 1893 (Part 1) 2016
Seismic Zone Factor 0.16 (IS 1893:2016 (Part 1) Table no.- 3
(Z) Clause 6.4.2)
Zone-3
 
Site Type I (IS 1893:2016 (Part 1) Table no.- 4
Clause 6.4.2.1)
Importance Factor 1.2 (Because occupancy is greater than
200 persons.) (IS 1893:2016 (Part 1)
Table no.- 8 Clause 7.2.3)
Eccentricities Ratio 0.05  
Response Reduction 4 (Because of Structural wall system).
Factor (IS 1893:2016 (Part 1), Table no.- 9
Clause 7.2.6)
Mass source D=1, Table no.- 9 (IS 1893:2016 (Part-1)
  L=0.5, L=0.25
(Live Load>3)
Live Load<3)
Time period in X 1.03 sec
direction
Time period in y direction 1.71 sec
  WIND PARAMETERS

Parameter Value Code Clause or table

 
WIND SPEED 44 m/s   Annex- A

TERRAIN CATEGORY 4 Clause 5.3.2.1

STRUCTURE CLASS B Clause 5.3.2.2

IS 875 (Part -3) 1987

RISK COEFFICIENT 1 Table-1

TOPOGRAPHY 1 Appendix-c
X Dir.0.7,
WIND COEFFICIENT 0.4 Table - 4
Y Dir.
0.8,0.1
 GUST FACTOR ANALYSIS

Guidelines for Gust Factor –

 
1. Buildings and closed structures with a height to minimum lateral dimension ratio of
more than about 5.
2. Buildings and closed structures whose natural frequency in the first mode is less than 1
Hz.
 Frequency=0.344 <1 Hz( so gust factor analysis is applicable)
Maximum Design Pressure: 688.713N/m^2 (Terrace)
Minimum Design Pressure: 290.40N/m^2 (stilt and base )
Maximum Force:
Fx-114.45KN
Fy-335.34KN
 MODAL ANALYSIS
TABLE: Modal Participating Mass Ratios 
 
Case Mode Period UX UY Sum UX Sum UY RZ
    Sec          
Modal 1 2.90 0.76 0.00 0.76 0.00 0.01
Modal 2 1.97 0.01 0.11 0.77 0.11 0.58
Modal 3 1.62 0.00 0.56 0.77 0.67 0.11
Modal 4 0.88 0.13 0.00 0.90 0.67 0.00
Modal 5 0.49 0.00 0.02 0.90 0.70 0.16
Modal 6 0.46 0.04 0.00 0.94 0.70 0.00
Modal 7 0.39 0.00 0.16 0.94 0.86 0.02
Modal 8 0.29 0.02 0.00 0.96 0.86 0.00
Modal 9 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.96 0.86 0.00
Modal 10 0.25 0.00 0.01 0.96 0.87 0.03
Modal 11 0.24 0.00 0.01 0.96 0.88 0.00
Modal 12 0.21 0.00 0.02 0.96 0.90 0.02
Modal 13 0.21 0.01 0.00 0.97 0.90 0.00
Modal 14 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.97 0.90 0.01
Modal 15 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.97 0.90 0.00
Modal 16 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.97 0.90 0.00
Modal 17 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.97 0.90 0.00
Modal 18 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.97 0.90 0.00
DEFLECTION PROFILE
Maximum deflection against cantilever or any individual element allowed = Span / 350 or 20
mm, whichever is less (As per IS 456 Clause 23.2).

•• Formula to calculate:
 
• (Maximum deflection - Axial Shortening) Creep Coefficient < Span / 350 or 20-mm. Span length =
1.61 m.
• Calculation = (22.155 – 21.279) 3 = 2.628 < 4.6 mm or 20 mm.
• So, allowable deflection is greater than actual deflection,
Hence passed
 STABILITY CHECKS
Check name Permissible value Check in Uncracked Check in Code
Model Service
Model
Drift 0.004 SPECX=0.002 SPECX=0.004 1. CLAUSE 7.11.1, IS1893
SPECY=0.0006 SPECY=0.001 PART (I) 2016
2. CLAUSE 5.4.1,
IS16700:2017
1. CLAUSE 5.4, IS
Displacement =H/500 WX=0.314 WX=0.41 16700:2017
due to wind =90000/500 WY=8.71 WY=10.01 2. CLAUSE 20.5, IS
(mm) =180 456:2000
3. TABLE-6, NBC 2016
(VOL-1)
Displacement =H/250 EX=28.70 EX=40.75 1. CLAUSE 5.4, IS 16700
due to =90000/250 EY=26.07 EY=36.985
earthquake =360 SPECX=30.09 SPECX=305.57
(mm) SPECY=45.45 SPECY=85.26

Net 20mm or (Total deflection

deflection (Span/350) mm -axial 1. CLAUSE 23.2.B, IS
Whichever is shortening) 456:2000
less = (22.155-
=1610/350 21.8)X3
=4.6mm =2.628mm
Buckling Check:

• Height of the building (H) : 86.35 m

• Least Lateral Dimension (B) : 22.4 m.
• Aspect ratio : H / B = (86.35 / 22
= 3.85 < 6.
• Hence buckling check is not required.
Checking of members passed:
FOUNDATION DESIGN

Type of foundation: Raft footing

Size of Raft: 3.5mX3.5m,
Thickness of Raft= 2.5m
Thickness of Drop= 3m

Grade of concrete: M40

Grade of steel: Fe 500
Safe bearing Capacity of the soil:
450 KN/mm2
 UNDERGROUND WATER TANK
20
Active Soil Pressure on Earth Walls

40

60

80

100

120
Resultant Moment (M11) Detailing (Plan)
PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND PLANNING CONSULTANCY
Understanding of
Civil
the Architectural 3D Modelling
engineering
Design and
Inputs
drawings
MEP
Works

WORKFLOW
IRR
Analysis

Execution at Contracts
BOQ, Scheduling
Site
 WORKFLOW EXPLANATION
• Civil engineering Inputs- Ideas about framing plan, column location, Typical Structures
like dome etc, Parabolic Balconies etc.
• 3D Modelling- Creating realistic 3D Model using Revit Architecture and resolving
clashes
• MEP Works- Mechanical, electrical, Plumbing fittings and drawings along with clash
detection using Revit Architecture
• IRR Analysis- Internal Rate of Return is measure of investment’s expected rate of
return. Cost vs Benefit Analysis
• Contracts- Preparing contracts between client and various contractors with proper
incentives for both sides.
• BOQ- Preparing Bill of quantities of for all components to be circulated for tenders
• Scheduling- Preparing time liner, Gannt charts etc to measure and see progress of
project.
ARCHITECHTURAL FLOOR PLAN
SECTION VIEW 3D VIEW
PLUMBING FLOOR PLAN
3D PLUMBING VIEW SECTION OF PLUMBING VIEW
CLASH DETECTION BETWEEN BEAM AND PIPE
CLASHES RESOLVED
CLASHES BETWEEN FLOOR AND PIPE
TIME LINER
SCHEDULING
 COST ANALYSIS AND BOQ

Cost Analysis

Miscellaneous
Painting According to the BOQ prepared,
7% 4%
Concrete we can see the costs involved in
Flooring 18%
16% various components of
construction.

A major portion of the money

Plastering will be used for steelwork and
6%
concrete.

Blockwork
15% Steel
28%
Shuttering
5%
 RATE ANALYSIS

CONCRETE

According to section 5.1, DAR,2016 Vol

1 prepared by CPWD

We’ve taken the cost of concrete to be at

Rs 6500 per cum, the difference accounts
for the difference in rates of Delhi and
Mumbai along with the time
 RATE ANALYSIS

STEEL

According to section 5.22A.6 , DAR,2016

Vol 1 prepared by CPWD

We’ve taken the cost of steel to be at Rs

56.00 per kg
 RATE ANALYSIS

FLOORING
According to section 11.41, DAR,2016
Vol 1 prepared by CPWD

We’ve taken the cost of flooring to be at

Rs 1720 per sqm, the difference accounts
for the difference in rates of Delhi and
Mumbai along with the time and different
standard sizes of tiles
 COST VS BENEFIT ANALYSIS

Estimated Cost of Project- Rs 50 crores including structures and interior works

Average rate per Sqft for selling in Vartak Nagar, Mumbai= Rs 16000/-

Selling Price for 212 One BHK = Rs 320*16000

=Rs 51,20,000
Selling Price for 108 Two BHK = Rs 520*16000
=Rs 83,20,000

Total Selling Price for the Project = 106,49,60,000+93,18,40,000

= Rs 199,68,00,000 , Say Approx. 200 crores
LEARNING’S FROM TRAINING PERIOD
Learning new Softwares and getting versed
with industry standards

Reading and Analysing Various CPWD and Working on real-time projects with timelines
govt. documents

Enhancement of soft skills

In depth knowledge of IS Codes

Cost Analysis Importance of Proper Planning and Team work

Time Management, Team work

THANK YOU
Name-Himank Chawla
Roll No-11710003
Section -CE-1