Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 29

Chapter 18

Operations improvement

Source: Courtesy of Lotus-Haed, www.pixelpusher.co.za

Slack, Chambers and Johnston, Operations Management 5th Edition © Nigel Slack, Stuart Chambers, and Robert Johnston 2007
Operations improvement

Operations
improvement
Operations
Operations
strategy process
improvement
makes processes
better
Operations Total quality
management management
Design Improvement organizes process
improvement
Failure
prevention and
recovery stop
Planning and processes
control becoming worse

Slack, Chambers and Johnston, Operations Management 5th Edition © Nigel Slack, Stuart Chambers, and Robert Johnston 2007
Performance measures at different levels of aggregation

Broad strategic Overall strategic


measures objectives

Functional strategic Market Operations Financial


measures strategic strategic strategic
objectives objectives objectives

Composite
Customer
performance Agility Resilience
satisfaction
measures
Generic operations
performance Quality Dependability Speed Flexibility Cost
measures
Defects per Mean time Customer Time to Transaction
Some detailed unit between query time market costs
performance Level of failures Order lead time Product Labour
customer Lateness Throughput range productivity
measures complaints complaints time Machine
Scrap level efficiency

Slack, Chambers and Johnston, Operations Management 5th Edition © Nigel Slack, Stuart Chambers, and Robert Johnston 2007
Performance measures at different levels of aggregation

Broad strategic High strategic


measures relevance and
aggregation

Functional strategic
measures

Composite performance
measures
Generic operations
performance measures
High diagnostic
Detailed performance power and
measures frequency of
measurement

Slack, Chambers and Johnston, Operations Management 5th Edition © Nigel Slack, Stuart Chambers, and Robert Johnston 2007
The measures used in the balanced scorecard
Financial performance
measures
To achieve strategic impact,
how should we be viewed by
shareholders?

Internal process Customer performance


performance measures Overall strategic measures
To achieve strategic impact, objectives
To achieve strategic
what aspects of impact, how should we
performance should be viewed by
business process excel at? customers?
Learning and growth
performance measures
To achieve strategic
impact, how will we
build capabilities over
time?

Slack, Chambers and Johnston, Operations Management 5th Edition © Nigel Slack, Stuart Chambers, and Robert Johnston 2007
Prioritizing process objectives

Priorities should be determined by …

The Your
IMPORTANCE PERFORMANCE

of each in each
competitive competitive
objective objective

IMPROVEMENT PRIORITIES

Slack, Chambers and Johnston, Operations Management 5th Edition © Nigel Slack, Stuart Chambers, and Robert Johnston 2007
Order-winning Qualifying Less important
objectives objectives objectives

+ve +ve +ve


Competitive benefit

Competitive benefit
Competitive benefit
neutral neutral neutral

Qualifying
–ve –ve level –ve

Low High Low High Low High


Achieved Achieved Achieved
performance performance performance

Slack, Chambers and Johnston, Operations Management 5th Edition © Nigel Slack, Stuart Chambers, and Robert Johnston 2007
9-point importance scale
For this product or service, does this performance objective …

1 …provide a crucial advantage with customers?


Order-winning
2 …provide an important advantage with most customers?
objectives
3 …provide a useful advantage with most customers?

4 …need to be up to good industry standard?


Qualifying 5 …need to be around median industry standard?
objectives
6 …need to be within close range of the rest of the industry?

7 …rate as not usually important but could become more so


Less important in future?
objectives 8 …very rarely rate as being important?
9 …never come into consideration?

Slack, Chambers and Johnston, Operations Management 5th Edition © Nigel Slack, Stuart Chambers, and Robert Johnston 2007
Temperature-controlled – overnight service

IMPORTANCE to customers
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
PRICE X
SERVQUAL (DISN.) X
SERVQUAL (ORDER TAKE) X
ENQUIRY LEAD-TIME X
DROP QUOTE X
WINDOW QUOTE X
DELIVERY PERFORMANCE X
DELIVERY FLEXIBILITY X
VOLUME FLEXIBILITY X
DOC. SERVICE X
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Slack, Chambers and Johnston, Operations Management 5th Edition © Nigel Slack, Stuart Chambers, and Robert Johnston 2007
9-point performance scale

For this product or service, is the achieved performance …

Better than 1 …consistently considerably better than our nearest


ses competitor’s?
competitors
oc e s
lar pr 2 …consistently clearly better than our nearest competitor’s?
i r
Sim stome s 3 …consistently marginally better than our nearest competitor’s?
Cu tation
ec
exp
Same as 4 …often marginally better than that of most competitors?
e s
competitors
roc ess 5 …about the same as that of most competitors?
rp
ila r
Sim ustome ns 6 …often close to that of our main competitors?
C
c t a ti o
e
exp
Worse than es 7 …usually marginally worse than that of our main competitors?
competitorsc ess
o 8 …usually worse than that of most competitors?
r pr
ila r
Sim ustome ns 9 …consistently worse than that of most competitors?
C
c t a ti o
e
exp

Slack, Chambers and Johnston, Operations Management 5th Edition © Nigel Slack, Stuart Chambers, and Robert Johnston 2007
Temperature-controlled – overnight service

PERFORMANCE against competitors


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

COST X
SERVQUAL (DISN.) X
SERVQUAL (ORDER TAKE) X
ENQUIRY LEAD-TIME X
DROP QUOTE X
WINDOW QUOTE X
DELIVERY PERFORMANCE X
DELIVERY FLEXIBILITY X
VOLUME FLEXIBILITY X
DOC. SERVICE X
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Estimated

Slack, Chambers and Johnston, Operations Management 5th Edition © Nigel Slack, Stuart Chambers, and Robert Johnston 2007
GOOD
1

better 2 EXCESS ?
than
APPROPRIATE X
3

a bi lity
ept
PERFORMANCE

COMPETITORS

f acc
same un do
bo
5
AGAINST

as
ow er
6 L IMPROVE
7
X
worse
8 URGENT
than ACTION
9
BAD

9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

less order
important qualifying
winning

IMPORTANCE
LOW FOR HIGH
CUSTOMERS

Slack, Chambers and Johnston, Operations Management 5th Edition © Nigel Slack, Stuart Chambers, and Robert Johnston 2007
GOOD
1
Delivery X
better 2 Volume flex.
than X Window
Drop quote quote
3
X X
X Servqual
4
PERFORMANCE

COMPETITORS

(Disn.)
same 5
Doc service X
AGAINST

as
6
Price/Cost X XDelivery flex.
7
Servqual X
(order take)
8
worse X
Enquiry Lead-time
than
9
BAD

9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

less order
important qualifying
winning

IMPORTANCE
LOW FOR HIGH
CUSTOMERS

Slack, Chambers and Johnston, Operations Management 5th Edition © Nigel Slack, Stuart Chambers, and Robert Johnston 2007
Innovation Kaizen

Short-term,
Short-term,dramatic
dramatic Effect Long-term,
Long-term,undramatic
undramatic
Large
Largesteps
steps Pace Small
Smallsteps
steps
Intermittent
Intermittent Timeframe Continuous,
Continuous,incremental
incremental
Abrupt,
Abrupt,volatile
volatile Change Gradual
Gradualand
andconsistent
consistent
Few
Fewchampions
champions Involvement Everyone
Everyone
Individual
Individualideas
ideas&&effort
effort Approach Group
Groupefforts,
efforts,systematic
systematic
Scrap
Scrapandandrebuild
rebuild Mode Protect
Protectand
andimprove
improve
New
Newinventions/theories
inventions/theories Spark Established
Establishedknow-how
know-how
Large
Largeinvestment
investment Capex Low
Lowinvestment
investment
Low
Loweffort
effort Maintenance Large
Largeeffort
effort
Technology
Technology Focus People
People
Profit
Profit Evaluation Process
Process

Slack, Chambers and Johnston, Operations Management 5th Edition © Nigel Slack, Stuart Chambers, and Robert Johnston 2007
The plan–do–check–act (or ‘Deming’) improvement cycle,
and the define–measure–analyze–improve–control
(or DMAIC) ‘six sigma’ improvement cycle

Define

Plan Do
Control Measure

Act Check Improve Analyze

Slack, Chambers and Johnston, Operations Management 5th Edition © Nigel Slack, Stuart Chambers, and Robert Johnston 2007
The DMAIC Define – identify the
cycle problem, define
requirements and set
the goal

Control – establish Measure – gather


performance data, refine problem
standards and deal and measure inputs
with any problems and outputs

Improve – develop Analyze – develop


improvement ideas, problem hypotheses,
test, establish identify ‘root causes’
solution, and and validate
measure results hypotheses

Slack, Chambers and Johnston, Operations Management 5th Edition © Nigel Slack, Stuart Chambers, and Robert Johnston 2007
‘Breakthrough’ improvement does not always deliver
hoped-for improvements

Planned ‘breakthrough’
improvements
Performance

Actual improvement
pattern

Time

Slack, Chambers and Johnston, Operations Management 5th Edition © Nigel Slack, Stuart Chambers, and Robert Johnston 2007
Continuous improvement

Performance

Standardize and maintain

Improvement

Time

Slack, Chambers and Johnston, Operations Management 5th Edition © Nigel Slack, Stuart Chambers, and Robert Johnston 2007
Continuous improvement
PDCA cycle repeated to create continuous improvement

Performance

Plan
Do
Act
Check

Time

Slack, Chambers and Johnston, Operations Management 5th Edition © Nigel Slack, Stuart Chambers, and Robert Johnston 2007
Combined improvement

Combined
Performance

‘breakthrough’ and
continuous improvement

Time

Slack, Chambers and Johnston, Operations Management 5th Edition © Nigel Slack, Stuart Chambers, and Robert Johnston 2007
Some common techniques for process improvement

Input/output analysis Flowcharts Scatter diagrams


x x

Input Output x x
x
x
x x
x
x x

Cause–effect diagrams Pareto diagrams ‘Why-why’ analysis

Why?
Why?
Why?

Slack, Chambers and Johnston, Operations Management 5th Edition © Nigel Slack, Stuart Chambers, and Robert Johnston 2007
The sandcone model of improvement

Cost
Flexibility
Speed

Dependability

Quality

Quality
Quality + dependability
Quality + dependability + speed
Quality + dependability + speed + flexibility
Quality + dependability + speed + flexibility + cost

Slack, Chambers and Johnston, Operations Management 5th Edition © Nigel Slack, Stuart Chambers, and Robert Johnston 2007
BPR advocates reorganizing (reengineering) processes
to reflect the natural processes that fulfil customer needs
Functionally based processes

Function 1 Function 2 Function 3 Function 4

End-to-end process 1

Customer needs fulfilled


Business processes
Customer needs

End-to-end process 2

End-to-end process 3

Slack, Chambers and Johnston, Operations Management 5th Edition © Nigel Slack, Stuart Chambers, and Robert Johnston 2007
Key Terms Test
Performance measurement
Measuring and assessing the various aspects of the
performance of a process or of a whole operation.

Polar diagram
A diagram that uses axes, all of which originate from the
same central point, to represent different aspects of
operations performance.

Benchmarking
Comparing methods and/or performance with other
processes in order to learn from them and/or assess
performance.

Slack, Chambers and Johnston, Operations Management 5th Edition © Nigel Slack, Stuart Chambers, and Robert Johnston 2007
Key Terms Test
Order-winning competitive factors
Those that directly and significantly contribute to winning
business.

Qualifying competitive factors


Those that have a minimum level of performance (the qualifying
level) below which customers are unlikely to consider an
operation’s performance to be satisfactory.

Less important competitive factors


Those that are neither order-winning nor qualifying, so that
performance in them does not significantly affect the
competitive position of an operation.

Slack, Chambers and Johnston, Operations Management 5th Edition © Nigel Slack, Stuart Chambers, and Robert Johnston 2007
Key Terms Test
Importance–performance matrix
A technique that brings together scores that indicate the relative
importance and relative performance of different competitive factors
in order to prioritize them as candidates for improvement.
Breakthrough improvement
An approach to improving operations performance that implies major
and dramatic change in the way an operation works; for example,
business process reengineering (BPR) is often associated with this
type of improvement, also known as innovation-based improvement,
contrasted with continuous improvement.

Continuous improvement
An approach to operations improvement that assumes many, relatively
small, incremental improvements in performance, stressing the
momentum of improvement rather than the rate of improvement;
also known by the Japanese term kaizen, often contrasted with
breakthrough improvement.

Slack, Chambers and Johnston, Operations Management 5th Edition © Nigel Slack, Stuart Chambers, and Robert Johnston 2007
Key Terms Test
Kaizen
Japanese term for continuous improvement.

Improvement cycles
The practice of conceptualizing problem solving as used in
performance improvement in terms of a never-ending
cyclical model, for example the PDCA cycle or the
DMAIC cycle.

PDCA cycle
Stands for Plan–Do–Check–Act cycle, perhaps the best
known of all improvement cycle models.

Slack, Chambers and Johnston, Operations Management 5th Edition © Nigel Slack, Stuart Chambers, and Robert Johnston 2007
Key Terms Test
DMAIC cycle
Increasingly used improvement cycle model, popularized
by the Six Sigma approach to operations improvement.

Business process reengineering


The philosophy that recommends the redesign of
processes to fulfil defined external customer needs.

Process maps
Diagrams that describe processes in terms of how the
activities within them relate to each other (also known as
process blueprinting or process analysis).

Slack, Chambers and Johnston, Operations Management 5th Edition © Nigel Slack, Stuart Chambers, and Robert Johnston 2007
Key Terms Test
Cause–effect diagram
A technique for searching out the root cause of problems;
a systematic questioning technique, also known as an
Ishikawa diagram.

Pareto analysis/law
A general law found to operate in many situations, which
indicates that 20% of something causes 80% of
something else, often used in inventory management
(20% of products produce 80% of sales value) and
improvement activities (20% of types of problems
produce 80% of disruption).

Slack, Chambers and Johnston, Operations Management 5th Edition © Nigel Slack, Stuart Chambers, and Robert Johnston 2007

You might also like