Results Part II: 自 强 不 息 厚 德 载 物 知 行 合 一 、 经 世 致 用 Central South University

You might also like

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 6

04

Results Part II

汇报人:安标清
知自 行强 合不 一息 、 厚
经 德
世 载
致 物
用 Central South University
Table 5
1. The main effect of feedback type was significant, χ2 (1,524) = 38.54, p <.0001.
2. The main effect of error type was significant as well χ2 (3,524) = 152.25, p <. 0001.
3. Pairwise analyses revealed the interaction between feedback type and error type was also
significant, χ2 (3,524) = 41.53, p <.0001, = error type affected choice of feedback.
4. Feedback preferences didn’t differ for grammatical and phonological errors, χ2 (1,345) .02.
Contingency Table for Loglinear Analysis of Feedback Type by Error Type
Grammatical Lexical Phonological L1 Total

Recast 185 (72.8%) 50 (40.7%) 67 (73.6%) 32 334 (63.8%)

Negotiation of 69 (27.2%) 73 (59.3%) 24 (26.4%) 24 190 (36.2%)


form

Total 254 (48.5%) 123 (23.5%) 91 (17.4%) 56 (10.6%) 524

自 强 不 息 厚 德 载 物 T s i n gCh eu na t rUa nl i S
v eo rust iht yU on fi v Ce hr si ni tay
Table 6
Number and Percentage of Repairs of Errors with Feedback

Phonological (n =104) 64 (62%)


1. 62% (64) of the 104 phonological errors recei
ving feedback were repaired
Lexical (n = 133) 55 (41%)
2. 41% (55) of the 133 lexical errors receiving fe
edback were repaired.
Grammatical (n = 257) 56 (22%) 3. Only 22% of the 257 grammatical errors with f
eedback were repaired,

L1 (n = 64) 11 (17%) 4. Only 17% of the unsolicited uses of L1 with fe


edback were repaired.
自 强 不 息 厚 德 载 物 T s i n gCh eu na t rUa nl i S
v eo rust iht yU on fi v Ce hr si ni tay
Table 7
Distribution of Grammatical, Lexical, and Phonological
Repairs Across Feedback Types
Grammatical Lexical Phonological

repairs repairs repairs


(n = 56) (n = 55) (n = 64)

Explicit correction 3 (5%) 3 (5%) 10 (16%)

Recast 19 (34%) 8 (15%) 39 (61%)


Negotiation of form 34 (61%) 44 (80%) 15 (23%)

自 强 不 息 厚 德 载 物 T s i n gCh eu na t rUa nl i S
v eo rust iht yU on fi v Ce hr si ni tay
Table 8
Contingency Table for Loglinear Analysis of Repaired-Error Type by Feedback Type 
1. The main effect of feedback was significant, χ2 (1,159) = 4.54, p <.05, indicating that significantly more repairs
resulted from the negotiation of form than from recasts.
2. The main effect of repaired – error type was not significant, χ2 (1,159) = .04, reflecting the equal distribution of
error types across repairs,
3. Although there was a significant interaction between feedback type and repaired – error type, χ2 (2, 159) =
38.18,p <.0001.
Negotiation of form was significantly more likely than recasts to precede lexical repairs
Grammatical Lexical repairs Phonological repairs Total
repairs
Recast 19 8 39 66

Negotiation of form 34 44 15 93

Total 53 52 54 159

自 强 不 息 厚 德 载 物 T s i n gCh eu na t rUa nl i S
v eo rust iht yU on fi v Ce hr si ni tay
谢谢大家
THANKS FOR ALL

关注微信公众号
“ 中南云麓谷”新媒体中心 出品
“ 中南云麓谷”
中南大学学生工作部(处)官方微信
定期共享优质资源

You might also like