Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cliques and Independent Sets
Cliques and Independent Sets
The complete bipartite graph is -free and has edges,
thus achieving the bound.
March 2020 Cliques and Independent Sets 3
Definition: A complete multipartite graph is a graph
whose vertices can be partitioned into sets so that is an
edge iff and belong to different sets.
Equivalently, ’s (complementary) components are
complete graphs.
We write where ,…, are the partite sizes and ’s
components are .
𝑛 1 𝑛1 ×𝑛2
𝑛 2
𝑛1 ×𝑛3
𝑛2 ×𝑛3
𝐾 𝑛 , 𝑛 ,𝑛
𝑛 3
1 2 3
Theorem: (Turán 1941) Let be an -vertex simple -free
graph. Then with equality iff (isomorphic).
Proof: (Zykov 1949) Use induction on . When there are
no edges. Let and be -vertex and -free.
Choose such that . Set and .
Therefore, by induction with equality iff .
Define by connecting all the vertices of to all the
vertices of an independent set.
𝑛 −𝑘 𝑘 × ( 𝑛 − 𝑘 )
𝑇 𝑟 −1 ,𝑘
𝐻
is -free ⇒ is an -vertex complete -partite graph -free.
⇒
We show that among all -vertex complete -partite
graphs has the maximum number of edges.
Proof: Create an -vertex graph in the -diameter circle
where an edge exists iff .
The former construction is , which by Turán’s theorem is
the largest excluding . Let us show that is -free.
Suppose contains comprising the points , constituting a
quadrilateral.
𝑦
𝑤
𝐾4
𝑥
Otherwise, let 180○. 𝑦
𝑧
The length of the edges is and one of the angles around
120 ○, yielding an opposite edge length , impossible.
Proof: Let be an -vertex graph and let .
Let (adjacent to ) and (nonadjacent to ) .
Since , one and only one of the following holds:
1. 2. .
2. : contains either or . Therefore contains either or .
Because one of 1 and 2 must hold, contains either or ,
⇒.
For the second part, let and be even, and have
vertices.
Consequently one and only one of the following holds:
1. 2. .
As in the former proof ⇒ contains either or ⇒ .
Example: Showing .
The graph neither contains nor ,
hence .
and are even, hence .
Proof: By induction on . It holds for .
. .
Assume by induction it holds for all .
is called diagonal Ramsey number. The above shows
that it grows at most exponentially. It is also bounded
below exponentially.
Theorem: (Erdős 1947) For all positive integer , .
There is therefore .
Suppose .
Then .
0
0 1 2 3 4 0
3
In this example and .
2
0
0 1 2 3 4 0