Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 18

By:-

Sushil kumar
Objective of project
To study international and Indian guideline available for
analysis of multi- story building subjected to seismic
excitation.
To study method available for analysis of multi-story
building.
Using staad pro & matlab for analysis of muti – story
building.
Comparison result of matlab & staad pro.
Method of seismic analysis
Equivalent Static Analysis

Response Spectrum Analysis

Linear Dynamic Analysis

Non-linear Static Analysis

Non-linear Dynamic Analysis


THREE DIMENSIONAL COMPUTER MODEL
Advantage of 3D computer model
Very complex structure analysis.
Real and accidental torsional effects must be considered
for all structures.
Only structural elements with significant stiffness
and ductility should be modeled. Non-structural
brittle components can be neglected.
The P-Delta effects should be included in all
structural models.
The mass of the structure can be estimated with a
high degree of accuracy.
Calculations
Column 450mm x 350mm
Beam 350mm x 250mm
Defining load combinations
1.5(DL+LL) DL- Dead Load
1.2(DL+LL+EL) LL- Live load
1.2(DL+LL-EL) EL- Earthquake load.
1.5(DL+EL)
1.5(DL-EL)
0.9DL+1.5EL
0.9DL-1.5EL
Z = 0.36 considering zone factor v
I = 1.0 considering residential building.
R = 5.0 considering special RC moment resistant frame
(SMRF)
S a /g = 1.65
The spectral acceleration coefficient (Sa/g) values are
calculated as follows.
For medium soil sites,
Sa/g = 1 + 15T, (0.00 ≤ T ≤ 0.10), (T= time period in sec)
= 2.50, (0.10 ≤ T≤ 0.55)
= 1.36/T, (0.55 ≤ T ≤ 4.00)
floor height from ground Seismic
level in m weight Wi in KN
24 2636.0
21 2636.0
18 2636.0
15 2636.0
12 2636.0
9 2636.0
6 2636.0
3 1600.5

Total Seismic weight of the Building W=20052.5 KN


Ta= .075 (h)*0.75 Where h = height of the building
=0.075x24*0.75
=0 .8132 sec
Sa/g = 1.65
Ah ={ZI(Sa/g)}/(2R)
= 0.059706 Ah =Design horizontal seismic
coefficient
Vb = Ah W
Vb= 0.059706x20052.5
= 1197254 KN
Lateral load profiles
IS 1893 (Part 1) 2002 parabolic lateral load (PLL) at floor ‘i’ is given by
Qpi=Vb(Wi hi *2)/∑( Wj hj *2)
Triangular lateral load (TLL) at floor ‘i’ is given by
Qpi=Vb(Wi hi )/∑( Wj hj )
Uniform lateral load (ULL) at floor ‘i’ is given by
Qpi=Vb(Wi )/∑( Wj )
Qpi= lateral loads as per IS: 1893-2002 and ATC-40 at each floor level
W = total seismic weight the structure
Wi = seismic weight of floor i
hi = height of floor measured from base
n = is the number of levels at which the masses are lumped.
h ground level Parabolic Lateral Triangular lateral
i Uniform
Lateral
(m) Load(KN) Load(KN) Load(KN)

3 6.704 27.656
95.559
6 31.008 75.427 157.319
9 60.820 105.358 157.319
12 100.449 136.486 157.319
15 150.135 166.418 157.319
18 209.758 196.349 157.319
21 279.199 227.470 157.319
24 358.697 257.40 157.319
3D DYNAMIC ANALYSIS
Procedure
1. A three dimensional computer model must be created in
which all significant structural elements are modeled.
2. The three dimensional mode shapes should be repeatedly
evaluated during the design of the structure.
3. The direction of the base reaction of the mode shape associated
with the fundamental frequency of the system is used to define
the principal directions of the three dimensional structure.
4. The “design base shear” is based on the longest
period obtained from the computer model.
5. Using the CQC method, the “dynamic base shears”
are calculated in each principal direction due to 100
percent of the Normalized Spectra Shapes . Use the
minimum value of the base shear in the principal
directions to produce one “scaled design spectra”.
6. The dynamic displacements and member forces are
calculated using the SRSS value of 100 percent of the
scaled design spectra applied non-concurrently in any two
orthogonal directions .
7. A pure torsion static load condition is produced using the
suggested vertical lateral load distribution defined in the
code
8.The member design forces are calculated using the
following load combination rule:
𝐹(𝐷𝐸𝑆𝐼𝐺N) = 𝐹(𝐷𝐸𝐴𝐷 𝐿𝑂𝐴𝐷) ± [ 𝐹(𝐷𝑌𝑁𝐴𝑀𝐼𝐶) + |𝐹(𝑇𝑂𝑅𝑆𝐼𝑂𝑁) | ] + 𝐹(𝑂𝑇𝐻𝐸𝑅)
Conclusion
1. 3D Dynamic Analysis is very useful in complex
civil structure analysis and designing.
2. Staad pro is very useful in civil engineering design
and analysis purposes.
THANK YOU

You might also like