Present Worth Analysis

You might also like

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 12

Present Worth Analysis

Goal

To convert a series of costs and benefits over a period of time


into one equivalent Present Time Value.
Definition

Present Worth Analysis is an equivalence method of analysis in


which a project’s cash flows are discounted to a single present
value.
Formula

Net Present Worth =

Present Worth of Benefits - Present Worth of Costs

NPW = PW of benefits - PW of costs

Cash Inflows (+ve)


Cash Outflows (-ve)
Functional Notation Version of Formula

Total Present Worth =

- P + A1 (P/A, i, n) - A2 (P/A, i, n) + F (P/F, i, n)


Initial Savings Maintenance Salvage
Cost Cost Value

Uniform Payments
Example 1 (Equal Life Alternatives)
Alternative X has first cost of $20,000, an operating cost of $9,000 per year, and
$5000 salvage value after 5 years. Alternative Y will cost $35,000 with an operating
cost of $4000 per year and a salvage value of $7,000 after 5 years. At MARR of 12%
per year, which should be selected?

X Y
Initial Cost 20,000 35,000
Operating Cost per year 9,000 4,000
Salvage Value 5000 7,000
Life span 5 5
i=12%
Example 1 (Equal Life Alternatives)
X Y
Initial Cost 20,000 35,000
Operating Cost per year 9,000 4,000
Salvage Value 5000 7,000
Life span 5 5
i=12%

PW of X = - 20,000 - 9000(P/A, 12%, 5) + 5000(P/F, 12%, 5)


= - 49,606 $
PW of Y = - 35,000 - 4000(P/A, 12%, 5) + 7000(P/F, 12%, 5)
= - 45,447 $
Example 2 (Different Life Alternatives)
Compare the machines below using present worth analysis a i=10% per year.

X Y
Initial Cost 20,000 30,000
Operating Cost per year 9,000 4,000
Salvage Value 4000 6,000
Life span 3 6
i=10%
Example 2 (Different Life Alternatives)
X Y
Initial Cost 20,000 30,000
Operating Cost per year 9,000 4,000
Salvage Value 4000 6,000
Life span 3 6
i=10%

PW of X = - 20,000 - 9000(P/A, 10%, 6) - 16000(P/F, 10%, 3) +4000 (P/F, 10%, 6)


= - 68,961 $
PW of Y = - 30,000 - 4000(P/A, 10%, 6) + 6000(P/F, 10%, 6)
= - 57,100 $
Merits
➔ Good measure of profitability
➔ Accepts conventional cash flow pattern
➔ Consideration of all cash flows
➔ Considers time value of money
Demerits
➔ Not useful for comparing projects of different sizes
➔ Might be inaccurate sometimes because it does not account
hidden costs
Thank You!

You might also like