Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Corporate Finance: The Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)
Corporate Finance: The Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)
Corporate Finance: The Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)
Outline
1 Individual Securities
2 Expected Return, Variance, and Covariance
3 The Return and Risk for Portfolios
4 The Efficient Set for Two Assets
5 The Efficient Set for Many Securities
6 Diversification: An Example
7 Riskless Borrowing and Lending
8 Market Equilibrium
9 Relationship between Risk and Expected Return (CAPM)
10 Summary and Conclusions
3
1 Individual Securities
• The characteristics of individual securities that are of interest
are the:
– Expected Return
– Variance and Standard Deviation
– Covariance and Correlation
4
Rate of Return
Scenario Probability Stock fund Bond fund
Recession 33.3% -7% 17%
Normal 33.3% 12% 7%
Boom 33.3% 28% -3%
1
2.05% (3.24% 0.01% 2.89%)
3
12
14.3% 0.0205
13
rP w1r1 w2 r2 w3 r3 ...... wn rn
• Consider a portfolio consists of 50% of Stock and 50% of
Bond
15
Risk
• Here you can not calculate the simple weighted average
• An effect that an investment has on the risk of another
investment.
• When we talk about the collection of many assets, level of
risk decreases as the number of invements increase, reason is
that the random risk or co. specific risk is cancelled out
across the different investments
20
Portfolio Return
10% 5.9% 7.4% 11.0%
15% 4.8% 7.6% 10.0% 100%
20% 3.7% 7.8% 9.0% stocks
25% 2.6% 8.0% 8.0%
30% 1.4% 8.2% 7.0%
35% 0.4% 8.4% 100%
6.0%
40% 0.9% 8.6% bonds
5.0%
45% 2.0% 8.8%
0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0%
50.00% 3.08% 9.00%
55% 4.2% 9.2% Portfolio Risk (standard deviation)
60% 5.3% 9.4%
65% 6.4% 9.6%
70% 7.6% 9.8%
75% 8.7% 10.0% We can consider other
80% 9.8% 10.2% portfolio weights besides
85% 10.9% 10.4%
90% 12.1% 10.6% 50% in stocks and 50% in
95%
100%
13.2%
14.3%
10.8%
11.0%
bonds …
25
11.0%
10.0%
9.0%
8.0%
7.0%
6.0%
5.0%
0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0%
Portfolio Return
10%
10% 5.9%
5.9% 7.4%
7.4% 11.0%
15%
15% 4.8%
4.8% 7.6%
7.6% 10.0% 100%
20%
20% 3.7%
3.7% 7.8%
7.8% 9.0% stocks
25%
25% 2.6%
2.6% 8.0%
8.0% 8.0%
30%
30% 1.4%
1.4% 8.2%
8.2% 7.0%
100%
35%
35% 0.4%
0.4% 8.4%
8.4% 6.0%
bonds
40%
40% 0.9%
0.9% 8.6%
8.6% 5.0%
45%
45% 2.0%
2.0% 8.8%
8.8% 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0%
50%
50% 3.1%
3.1% 9.0%
9.0%
55%
55% 4.2%
4.2% 9.2%
9.2% Portfolio Risk (standard deviation)
60%
60% 5.3%
5.3% 9.4%
9.4%
65%
65% 6.4%
6.4% 9.6%
9.6%
70%
70%
75%
7.6%
7.6%
8.7%
9.8%
9.8%
10.0%
We can consider other
75% 8.7% 10.0%
80%
80% 9.8%
9.8% 10.2%
10.2% portfolio weights besides
85%
85% 10.9%
10.9% 10.4%
10.4%
90%
90% 12.1%
12.1% 10.6%
10.6%
50% in stocks and 50% in
95%
95% 13.2%
13.2% 10.8%
10.8% bonds …
100%
100% 14.3%
14.3% 11.0%
11.0%
27
Portfolio Return
10% 5.9% 7.4% 11.0%
15% 4.8% 7.6% 10.0% 100%
20% 3.7% 7.8% 9.0% stocks
25% 2.6% 8.0% 8.0%
30% 1.4% 8.2% 7.0% 100%
35% 0.4% 8.4% 6.0% bonds
40% 0.9% 8.6% 5.0%
45% 2.0% 8.8% 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0%
50% 3.1% 9.0%
55% 4.2% 9.2% Portfolio Risk (standard deviation)
60% 5.3% 9.4%
65% 6.4% 9.6% Note that some portfolios are
70% 7.6% 9.8%
75% 8.7% 10.0% “better” than others. They have
80% 9.8% 10.2% higher returns for the same level of
85% 10.9% 10.4%
90% 12.1% 10.6% risk or less.These compromise the
95%
100%
13.2%
14.3%
10.8%
11.0%
efficient frontier.
28
Two-Security Portfolios with Various
Correlations
return
100%
= -1.0 stocks
= 1.0
100%
= 0.2
bonds
29 Portfolio Risk/Return Two Securities:
Correlation Effects
• Relationship depends on correlation coefficient
• -1.0 < < +1.0
• The smaller the correlation, the greater the risk reduction
potential
• If= +1.0, no risk reduction is possible
30
return
Individual Assets
P
Consider a world with many risky assets; we can still identify
the opportunity set of risk-return combinations of various
portfolios.
31
return minimum
variance
portfolio
Individual Assets
P
return
o nt i er
r
ie nt f
c
effi
minimum
variance
portfolio
Individual Assets
P
return
100%
stocks
rf
100%
bonds
return
CM 100%
stocks
Balanced
fund
rf
100%
bonds
Now investors can allocate their money across the T-bills and a
balanced mutual fund
35
return
L
CM efficient frontier
rf
P
With a risk-free asset available and the efficient
frontier identified, we choose the capital allocation line
with the steepest slope
36
8 Market Equilibrium
return
L
CM efficient frontier
rf
P
With the capital allocation line identified, all investors
choose a point along the line—some combination of the
risk-free asset and the market portfolio M. In a world with
homogeneous expectations, M is the same for all investors.
37
return
L
CM efficient frontier
rf
P
The Separation Property states that the market portfolio, M, is the same
for all investors—they can separate their risk aversion from their
choice of the market portfolio.
38
return
L
CM efficient frontier
rf
P
Investor risk aversion is revealed in their choice of where to
stay along the capital allocation line—not in their choice of
the line.
39
Market Equilibrium
return
CM 100%
stocks
Balanced
fund
rf
100%
bonds
Just where the investor chooses along the Capital Asset
Line depends on his risk tolerance. The big point though
is that all investors have the same CML.
40
Market Equilibrium
return
CM 100%
stocks
Optimal
Risky
Porfolio
rf
100%
bonds
All investors have the same CML because they all have the
same optimal risky portfolio given the risk-free rate.
41
return
CM 100%
stocks
Optimal
Risky
Porfolio
rf
100%
bonds
The separation property implies that portfolio choice can be
separated into two tasks: (1) determine the optimal risky
portfolio, and (2) selecting a point on the CML.
42
Optimal Risky Portfolio with a Risk-Free Asset
L 0 CML 1
return
CM 100%
stocks
Cov( Ri , RM )
i
( RM )
2
44
Estimating with regression
Security Returns
i ne
c L
s t i
r i
c t e
a
har
C Slope = i
Return on
market %
R i = i + i Rm + e i
45
Cov( Ri , RM )
i
( RM )
2
R i RF β i ( R M RF )
Expected return R i RF β i ( R M RF )
RM
RF
1.0
R i RF β i ( R M RF )
50
Relationship Between Risk & Expected Return
Expected
return
13.5%
3%
1.5
β i 1.5 RF 3% R M 10%
R i 3% 1.5 (10% 3%) 13.5%
51
return
borrowing or L
lending, the CM efficient frontier
investor selects a
point along the M
CML.
rf
P
53
2 ( RM )
• The CAPM states that the expected return on a security is
positively related to the security’s beta:
R i RF β i ( R M RF )