Agenda:

1. Rangkuman (BPMIGAS)
2. Introduction (Nara Nilandaroe)
3. Geological Findings (Nuli Yudhandono)
4. Reservoir Description (Loh Lake Liang)
5. Reserves and Production Forecast (Loh Lake Liang)
6. Drilling and Completion (Memet Rachmat / Imanudin)
7. Production Facilities and Field Dev. Scenario (Nurcahya)
8. HSE and CSR (Hendri Sigalingging and Livia Sakidin)
9. Abandonment and Site Restoration (Nurcahya)
10. Local Content (Uky Isfandiari)
11. Project Schedule (Nurcahya)
12. Project Economic (Dwi Putranti)

02/24/21
 Block History
 Original Northwest Natuna PSC is comprised an acreage of 2304.7 km 2 previously relinquished by
Premier in 2002 after drilled Ande Ande Lumut (AAL)-1 (Oil Discovery) in 2000.

 GONPL was awarded the Northwest Natuna PSC Block on 12 th December 2004.

 Exploration by GONPL commenced with the acquisition of 300 km 2 full-fold of 3D seismic survey
over the AAL structure in 2005.

 GONPL drilled AAL-2X-R in 2006. The well confirmed oil accumulation in the Upper Gabus K and
G-sands to the south of AAL Structure. The well was abandoned as an oil discovery at a total
depth of 1356 mBRT in the meta-sediment basement.

 AAL-3X was spudded by GONPL on 20th October 2006. The well was plugged and abandoned at
a total depth of 1290 mBRT as an oil discovery, after carrying out two DSTs of 521 BOPD and
1220 BOPD in the G and K sands.

 MIGAS approved the 15% first relinquishment of the Northwest Natuna on 19 th June 2008.

 Technical discussion for the AAL Field was conducted with BPMIGAS since December 2008.

 LAPI ITB conducted extensive AAL GGR Study in 2009 and certified the AAL Reserve.

 BPMIGAS granted one (1) year exploration period for Northwest Natuna PSC on 8 th November
2010.

 GONPL submitted final AAL First POD to BPMIGAS on 24 th February 2011.

 GONPL submitted a proposal for second relinquishment to BPMIGAS on 16 December 2010.

MIGAS approved on 26th May 2011. Remaining area is 460.94 km 2 (20% of the original area).
02/24/21 2
 Northwest Natuna PSC
Genting Oil Natuna Pte Ltd

Block History
 Outline
• Geological Findings
- Regional Geology
- Seismic Data & Interpretation
- Geological Modeling
- Petrophysical Evaluation
 Khorat Swell

AAL is a
Cahaya Deep basement
drapped
anticline

Belumut High

N-Kakap Deep

Anoa Deep

Basement Map
 Seal

Reservoir

Source Rock

Upper Gabus Reservoir - Deposited in

Fluvio-Deltaic Environment
 AAL IS A NEW PLAY TYPE

AAL is Basement Draped Antincline

Conventional Play
In West Natuna Basin
 Outline
• Geological Findings
- Regional Geology
- Seismic Data & Interpretation
- Geological Modeling
- Petrophysical Evaluation
 Seismic Database

• Consist of 3D data set

covering an area of 311sq
km.

• Three data are available

for advanced interpretation
(Near, Mid, Far)

• Acquired in August 2005

• Total of 1493 stacking

velocity were used for
depth conversion.

• 3 wells data were

available for integration
into the seismic
interpretation (AAL-1,
AAL-2XR & AAL-3X)
 Well Ties

• Model based wavelet estimation

was run iteratively to obtain the
best wavelet in minimizing the misfit
between seismic and synthetic
seismogram.

• Edited VSP data was used as time-

depth relationship in generating the
synthetic seismogram.

• The seismic-synthetic seismogram

indicate a very good correlation.

• Top K sand and Base K sand

markers were correlated to a
positive reflector at both seismic
data and synthetic seismogram.

• Top G sand marker which is too

close to the Base K sand does not
correlate to any reflector at AAL-
2XR & AAL-3X.
 AAL-1 AAL-2XR AAL-3X

Synthetic seismogram indicates good correlation in AAL-1, AAL-2XR, and AAL-3X wells
 Fault & Horizon Interpretation
•Seismic interpretation was
done using Kingdom
software. AAL-1 AAL-3X AAL-2XR

•Top K sand and Base K sand

horizons were interpreted
with confidence as the
seismic reflector are
continuous.
Top Barat
•Top G sand horizons is less Top K-Sand
certain due to its doublet Base K-Sand
nature, it termination or onlap
in the eastern area and poor Top Basement

seismic processing below

Base K sand.

•Basement horizon has high

uncertainty due to poor
seismic processing of the
stacked data around the
Basement reflector.

•No fault was found over the

Ande Ande Lumut structure.
Full Stack Top K Sand Time Structure Map Full Stack Base K Sand Time Structure Map

Full Stack Top G Sand Time Structure Full Stack Near Top Basement Time Structure Map
Map
 Time to Depth Conversion

Time -De p th Curve

VS P : AAL-2 X, AAL-3 X a nd AAL-1 X
•Available stacking velocities, VSP and well
data were used for the depth conversion. Time (miliseconds)
0.000 0.200 0.400 0.600 0.800 1.000 1.200 1.400 1.600
0

•Stacking velocity was conditioned to 100

remove the ‘bull eye’ caused by erroneous
200
stacking velocities.
300

•The processing sequence of velocity 400

volume include data conditioning, optimization, 500

first pass calibration, fine tuning and flexing to 600

generate most likely depth map. 700

Depth (meter MSL)

800

•Kriging Error method was used to generate 900

the fast velocity and slow velocity case.
1000

•The well-based depth maps were 1100

generated using the well velocity data only. 1200

1300
AAL-2X/R
1400

1500 AAL-3X

1600 AAL-1X

1700
Depth Maps Comparison
 Outline
• Geological Findings
- Regional Geology
- Seismic Data & Interpretation
- Geological Modeling
- Petrophysical Evaluation
 GEOMODELLING WORKFLOW (LAPI ITB, 2008)
Genting Oil Natuna Pte. Ltd

Data Loading and Geological Analysis

Structure Modeling and 3D Grid Generation
Zonation/Layering
Neural Net Litho-typing
- Top and Base K-Sand depth grids &
faults from seismic depth maps provide
structural control
- 3 wells (AAL-1 to 3)
- Regional geology and sedimentological
framework
- Approx. 100 ft. core in AAL-3

Log upscaling/QC

Facies Modeling Seq. Indicator Simulation

Petrophysical Modeling Seq. Gaussian Simulation

Model Verification/QC
Dynamic Simulation
Model

Volumetric calculation (STOIIP)

 Structural Modeling, Zoning and Layering

Finely Structured Model:

- Structural control
- Top K-Sand horizon mapped and depth convert
using stacking velocity cube (Jason)
- Base K-Sand derived from K-Sand thickness map

- Isopachs used for Zonation

- total 5 zones (K-1 to K-5)
- zonations aimed to capture vertical heterogeneity in
K-sand

- Layering (each zone 10 – 40 layers)

- 110 Layers

3D Dimensions (50 x 50 m)
187 x 197 x 110
4,031,720 Cells
 Facies Modeling
K-Sand Thickness Map

• K-Sand thickness varies from 112 ft (AAL-1X) to 146 ft (AAL-2XR) Multiple logs as an input for unsupervised neural network
• general thickening towards SSW, suggest sand fairway depocentre
located SSW of AAL-2 and edgein the NNE area

• Model Cells/ Up-scaled Log/ Log Data show good correlation

Unsupervised Neural Network as a facies modeling
framework
 Petrophysical Modeling

100000

1000 0

1000

100

10

y = 0.4154e28.649x
R2 = 0.5789
1
0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.4 0

P o ro sit y

Porosity + Permeability

• Porosity and permeability models conditioned to

lithotypes
• High porosity and permeability corresponds to good
sand lithotype
• Gas saturation is a function of reservoir property and
FWL
• Capillary pressure saturation height used to determine
gas saturation for reservoirs based on FWL’s
• All of the petrophysical model are constraint by facies model
 Ande Ande Lumut Field, Fluid Contact

AAL-3X
• Core, from oil stain intensity : 3777’ SS
MRIAN PRE-DST
• AAL-3X RDT sample at depth 3763’ SS : water + small oil
INTEPRETATION
• AAL-3X MRIAN Interpretation is 3773’ SS
1156.5 m DST#2 (K-sand) - ESP
• Logs interpretation : Perf. Interval:1152.5-1160.5 mBRT
– AAL-1X at depth 3778’ SS Rate : 1220 BoPD
– AAL-2XR at depth 3773’ SS Sp. Gr : 14.2º API
GOR : 55 scf/bbl (PVT)
– AAL-3X at depth 3773’ SS

1167.5 m RDT Sample: Oil

1171 m
Contact By Logs Interpretation RDT Sample: Water + Small Oil
1172 m (3763 ftSS)
(3773 ftSS)
AAL-2X AAL-3X AAL-1X
3.3 km 1.4 km
GR PHI SW GR PHI SW GR PHI SW
RDT 3706’SS
MDT 3714’SS
Rec. Oil
DST#2 (3699-3726’SS; ESP) Rec. Oil 450 cc
DST#1 (3703-3746’SS)
1242 BO/D with API 13.3 No Oil flow with API 25
CORE INTERVAL

RDT 3747’SS
Rec. Oil with
API 30.3
Contact

MDT 3842.5’SS
Rec. Oil 2500 cc
with API 18.3

RDT 3881’SS MDT 3876’SS

Rec. Oil with DST#1 (3875-3898’SS; ESP) Rec. Oil 450 cc with
API 22 521 BO/D with API 9.8 API 22.2

1
3

RDT 4006’SS 2
Rec. Oil with
API 27
 Outline
• Geological Findings
- Regional Geology
- Seismic Data & Interpretation
- Geological Modeling
- Petrophysical Evaluation
Petrophysical parameters Cut-Off Parameters

• a,m,n derived from SCAL.

• Water salinity from Pickett-Plot
• Density from PVT Analysis
 Vclay Cut-Off

There would be no flow for V-clay higher than 10%. This V-clay = 10% is therefore used
for V-clay cut-off
 Porosity Cut-Off

The Cumulative Percentage of Permeability plot represents the contribution of each

permeability component in the rock to the flow, any rock with 20% porosity or lower
will not have any significant contribution to the flow
 Water Saturation Cut-Off

It is indicated that at Sw = 60%, the water cut reaches close to 99%. This Sw = 60% is used for the Sw
cut-off. The rationale is that with the future +/-350,000 BLPD handling capacity and +/-4,000 BOPD oil
economic limit, the water cut reaches 98.6%.
 Log Analysis Results Genting Oil Natuna Pte. Ltd

Gross Oil Average Average

Net Pay
Interval Thickness Sw Porosity
m
m % %
K-Sand
AAL-1X 21.94 19.97 37.28 29.35
AAL-2X-R 8.30 8.30 40.20 27.92
AAL-3X 20.80 18.60 39.12 26.52

G-Sands -
AAL-1X 15.08 4.57 27.31 30.53
AAL-2X-R 13.70 3.1 25.70 26.48
AAL-3X 7.80 7.8 17.15 30.43
104
Thank You
Back-Up
REGIONAL
NORTHWEST NATUNA PLAY TYPES

Gajah Baru, Pelikan, Naga, AA : Channel + Anticline (12) and Compressional Anticline (5)
KF : Compressional Anticline (5)
KRA : Wrench High Side (10) and High Side Horst (8)
KH and KG : Channel + Anticline (12), Wrench High Side (10) and Wrench Anticline
SEISMIC
 Time – Depth Conversion Workflow

Stacking Velocity
Conditioning Seismic Velocity Based scenario
Well-base scenario (FJ – Version)

TZs Optimization

Average Velocity at
First Pass Calibration Well Tops
(conditioned velocity Calculate Kriging Error
calibration)

Fine Tuning Average Minus Plus

Velocity Model
Map Interpolation

Most- likely Case

Fast velocity Case Low velocity Case
average velocity model

Flexed to Well tops

Most-likely Fast velocity Low velocity Well-base Case

Case depth Case depth Case depth depth maps
maps maps maps
 The interval velocity is 9034.79 ft/s
Tuning Thickness in TWT 0.008 sec

(Tuning Thickness in TWT)/2 x Interval Velocity = Tuning Thickness

Example for this is : the interval velocity for this range (0.75 – 1.25 s) is 30.89 ft
9034.79 ft/s

15.46 ft

35.47 ft
So the tuning thickness would be
(0.008/2) s x 9034.79 ft/s = 36.14 ft
16.67 ft

22.13 ft
NNE SSW
A B

1
3

2
B
 Volumetrics Comparison
(Assuming Contact at 1150 m)

Case Volume (m^3)

Base Case Velocity 3.24664+E08

High Case Velocity 3.19035+E08

Low Case Velocity 3.30731+E08

Well Based Velocity 3.4725+E08

 Figure 28: Uncertainty Ranges From Different Velocity Scenarios Vs. Max Difference
(Most Likely, Slow Velocity, Fast Velocity And Well Based Velocity)

a. Individual time-depth map – small error Well Based Velocity

Most Likely Velocity
Slow Velocity
Fast Velocity

b. Max difference – bigger error

 Figure 27: Maximum Depth Difference Between Different Depth Maps
(Most Likely, Slow Velocity, Fast Velocity And Well Based Velocity)

Maximum difference (well base velocity minus fast velocity)

Max difference

Maximum difference (positive)

Maximum difference (negative) Individual time-depth

map

Maximum difference (combined after normalised)

Do we need seismic attribute to derive properties distribution ?

What we have? What we done?

• 3D Simultaneous AVO Inversion by Odegaard (2006);
– Only used 1 well (AAL – 1X)
– Output 3D cubes :
• Acoustic Impedance
• Poisson’s Ratio
• Density
• Rock Physics and Forward Modeling Study by Fugro (2007);
– Feasibility study based on 3 wells to determine extent of lithology and fluid from

the AAL seismic data through simultaneous inversion

– No output 3D cube, only test lines for example
• Rock Property and Seismic Attributes Analysis Upper Gabus K Sand by
Wong Sook Chen (In-house - 2007);
– Review all previous study
– Extract attributes from Odegaard 3D cubes and Full Stack Seismic Amplitude
Do we need seismic attribute to derive properties distribution ?

Odegaard …..
Do we need seismic attribute to derive properties distribution ?

Odegaard …..
Do we need seismic attribute to derive properties distribution ?

Fugro …..
Rock Physics & Forward Modeling
Study Objectives
• Build a petro-elastic model based on the petrophysical results from 3 wells
• Run fluid substitution analysis
• Determine how, and to what extent, lithology and fluid information can be
extracted from the seismic data across the prospect

Conclusion
– A Rockphysics model was built which provides a good overall match with the observed rock
properties from the petrophysics results of the three wells.
– Combination of P-impedance and Vp/Vs can separate hydrocarbon sands from other
lithologies at seismic resolution for the K sand and G2 sand ???????
– G1 sand is too thin for separation of fluid type with simultaneous seismic inversion
– There is some overlap of the petroelastic properties of the brine sands and pay sands. This
can be evaluated using a probabilistic approach such as RockRisk
– Separation between brine and pay sand increases in the event that the actual oil API is
greater than the value of 9 API used in the forward modeling phase of this project
 Genting Oil Natuna Pte. Ltd

6. Simultaneous Inversion and Other Studies

• Rock properties analysis for all wells suggested a typical NW

Natuna basin trend where shale has higher acoustic
impedance than sand.

• The acoustic impedance data from 3D Simultaneous

Inversion study was calibrated to the AAL-1 well. It was
further validated by AAL-2XR and AAL-3X well data after
drilling.

4 November 2008 55
 Rock property analysis
Genting Oil Natuna Pte. Ltd

AAL-1X AAL-2X AAL-3X

Well resolution

Coal

Shale

Brine Sand

Oil Sand

Seismic resolution @ 80 Hz slope 40 Hz, 2ms sampling AAL-1X AAL-2X AAL-3X

Coal

Shale

Brine Sand

Oil Sand

Overlying shale has higher acoustic impedance than K sand.

4 November 2008 56
 Acoustic Impedance data from 3D Simultaneous Natuna Pte.Oil
Genting Ltd

Inversion

Acoustic Impedance map at Top K sand horizon indicates north south trend of
geological features.

4 November 2008 57
 Genting Oil Natuna Pte. Ltd

AAL-3X

AAL-2XR

PDF-A for oil sand

(green) suggest
AAL-3X oil sand in AAL-
AAL-2XR 1X, AAL-2X and
AAL-3X may
extend into north.

4 November 2008 58
 POROSITY IN ALL AREA

AI MODEL EXISTING MODEL

 ONLY IN 2P AREA

AI MODEL EXISTING MODEL

FACIES MODELING
NON RESERVOIR = POR < 0.2

MOD. SAND = 0.2 ≤ POR > 0.27

GOOD SAND = POR ≥ 0.27

PROPERTY MODELING
 Genting Oil Natuna Pte. Ltd
DERIVATION OF SATURATION MODEL FOR K-SAND (LAYER 1)

Facies distribution Porosity distribution Permeability distribution NG distribution

HWL distribution Sw distribution

• Porosity and permeability models conditioned to
lithotypes
• High porosity and permeability corresponds to good
sand lithotype
• Gas saturation is a function of reservoir property and
FWL
• Capillary pressure saturation height used to determine
gas saturation for reservoirs based on FWL’s

4 November 2008 78
 Genting Oil Natuna Pte. Ltd
UNCERTAINTIES SCENARIOS - RESERVOIR GEOMETRY
– Long elongated shapes (6500, 2500, NNW-SSE)
– Moderate elongated shapes (3000, 2000, NNW-SSE)
– Circular shapes (2000, 2000, NNW-SSE)

– multiple realisations facies model are based on random distribution of lithofacies honouring
reservoir parameters
– Due to generally less variable reservoir types in AAL field, the effect of varying reservoir
4 November 2008 85
geometries (dimension and shapes) are small
 UNCERTAINTIES SCENARIOS - POROSITY Genting Oil Natuna Pte. Ltd

Most likely High

Low

4 November 2008
86
 ANDE ANDE LUMUT FIELD, PERMEABILITY MODELLING Genting Oil Natuna Pte. Ltd

AAL-3, Poroperm Crossplot AAL-3, Poroperm Crosplot - Mostlikely case

100000 100000
June core av. K-Phi

DST av. K-Phi

(6497 mD, 0.32) y = 11.337e20.966x
10000 (10000 mD, 0.30) 10000

1000 y = 2.6528e20.966x 1000

100 100

Permeability(mD) Permeability(mD)
10 y = 0.1386e29.116x 10

1 1
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35

Porosity (%) Porosity (%)

• In general measured porosity from AAL-3 core show good match with DST data, measured core
permeability is approx. 7.7 times lower than perm derived from DST
• Re-measurement of core analysis results by alternate laboratory show better match with DST
results used to derived base case model and no multiplier required to match DST data

4 November 2008 87
 UNCERTAINTIES SCENARIOS - SW Genting Oil Natuna Pte. Ltd

• Sw
– Low (based on J-function, fitted to June Dean Stark Sw)
– Most likely (based on log derived J-functions)
– High (based on analog derived J-function)
Depth
0 GR 150 (ft tvss) 0 Sw 1

Low Case
(June DS core Sw)

Most likely
(log)

High case
(analog)

- Original Dean Stark Core measured Sw (erroneous values)

- Re-measured Sw measured from preserved cores

4 November 2008 88
 UNCERTAINTIES SCENARIOS – NET-TO-GROSS Genting Oil Natuna Pte. Ltd

• Net-to-gross
– Low (based on porosity cut-off 14% and permeability cutoff 5 mD)
– Most likely (based on porosity cut-off 12% and permeability cutoff 1 mD)
– High (based on porosity cut-off 10% and permeability cutoff 0.1 mD)

Low Mean=0.9951 ML Mean=0.9962 High Mean=0.9977

4 November 2008 89
 Genting Oil Natuna Pte. Ltd
ANDE ANDE LUMUT FIELD - STOIIP DISTRIBUTION

• STOIIP distribution based on 3000 realisations (3 structural cases, each 1000 runs)
4 November 2008 90
CORE DATA
 Figure 7: Porosity-permeability review, core-to-log depth match

match log depth

Shift to core to
- 2 feet

- 3 feet

- 2 feet

a. Core to log depth match by -5 feet b. Core to log depth match by -7 feet

- Depth match from -5 to -7 ft, better fitting of low and high porosity of core measured and log derived values
 Figure 8: Porosity-permeability review, core measured vs log derived

Porosity from core plug

Porosity from log interpretation

a. Core porosity vs. log derived porosity b. Core porosity vs. log derived porosity (+0.02 PU)
- Log derived porosity appeared to be generally lower than core measured porosity be 2 porosity unit
- adding 2 PU to log derived porosity improved match to core measured porosity, suggesting pessimistic nature
of the current log interpretation
 Figure 9: Porosity review, core measured by different laboratories
Comparison core porosities (2007 vs. 2008)

Legend:
- 2007 core plugs
- 2008 preserved plugs

- core porosities measured by different laboratories display high degree of consistency and
were therefore used as the most likely case in the geomodel
PETROPHYSICS
 Log Analysis Results AAL-1X
Genting Oil Natuna Pte. Ltd

4 November 2008
105
 Log Analysis Results AAL-2XR
Genting Oil Natuna Pte. Ltd

4 November 2008
106
 Log Analysis Results AAL-3X
Genting Oil Natuna Pte. Ltd

4 November 2008
107
MIRIAN AAL-2XR MIRIAN AAL-3XR
Lead & Prospect Inventory
 2D Seismic Batas Teritorial
Inu Kertapati
Data Indonesia – Malaysia

3D Seismic
Data Field
Wilayah
Nakulo Penyisihan Ke-
1 (15 %)
Prospect
Wilayah
SE_AAL Penyisihan
Keong Mas Ke-2
Wilayah Akhir Lead
Timun Mas
(20%)
Kirana
Luas Awal : 2.304,700 Km 2
Luas Area Akhir (20%) : 460,943 Km 2
Luas Penyisihan : 1.843,757 Km 2

Leads & Prospects

Map
DATE : MEI 2011 AUTHOR :
EXPLORATION
Komitmen 750 km akusisi
The retained area (the blue highlight) already fulfilled with seismic data
???????
 AAL FIELD – SEDIMENTOLOGY AND
SCHEMATIC RESERVOIR DISTRIBUTION
AAL-3 Core Summary AAL field, braided channel stacking pattern
AAL-3
Top K-Sand

Cored Interval
Base K-Sand

Schematic K-Sand braided channel

(analogue for Ande Ande Lumut field)

km
3
6
owc km

Brahmaputra River, India

Note: analogue for reservoir geometry and channel stacking pattern only, scale enlarged

• AAL-3X cores suggested that K-Sand deposited in a wide, high sediment supply braided channel complex
• stacked channel, overlying channels cutting the older channel with degree  geometry and dimension of individual channel uncertain
 AAL FIELD : FIELD OVERVIEW AND BASIC DATA

Field Overview
Top K-Sand • Discovered in 2000 by Ande Ande Lumut-1
exploration well
• 2 appraisal wells (AAL-2 and AAL-3)
• Structure
- Four-way dip closure basement drape
anticline
• Stratigraphy and sedimentology
- Oligocene Upper Gabus Formation
- reservoir sands comprise medium (occ.
coarse) to fine grained sand
- < 3% shale
- sandstone erosive based, faintly
crossbedded, massive, laminated and
generally display upward fining character
- sediment comprise stacked channels,
deposited in a wide braided channel complex
(>30 km wide)

02/24/21 77