Language exists in varieties associated with geographical areas and social groups. A language is an abstract system used by an entire community, while a dialect is a subordinate variety spoken by a group. Dialects develop through geographical and social separation, leading to regional dialects defined by a region and social dialects defined by factors like class, religion, and ethnicity. Bell established criteria to distinguish languages from dialects including standardization, vitality, and autonomy.
Language exists in varieties associated with geographical areas and social groups. A language is an abstract system used by an entire community, while a dialect is a subordinate variety spoken by a group. Dialects develop through geographical and social separation, leading to regional dialects defined by a region and social dialects defined by factors like class, religion, and ethnicity. Bell established criteria to distinguish languages from dialects including standardization, vitality, and autonomy.
Language exists in varieties associated with geographical areas and social groups. A language is an abstract system used by an entire community, while a dialect is a subordinate variety spoken by a group. Dialects develop through geographical and social separation, leading to regional dialects defined by a region and social dialects defined by factors like class, religion, and ethnicity. Bell established criteria to distinguish languages from dialects including standardization, vitality, and autonomy.
All languages exhibit internal variation, that is, each language exists in a number of varieties and is in one sense the sum of those varieties (Wardaugh: 2006).
We can define variety of a language as a set of linguistic items
or human speech patterns (sounds, words, grammatical features, etc) which can be associated with some external factors (a geographical area or social group) (Wardaugh: 2006).
This can make us conclude that Canadian English, American
English, Brazilian Portuguese, Angolan Portuguese are varieties of English and Portuguese respectively. The terms Language and Dialect are both defined as a vehicle of communication used by a particular community or society. However, language is always seen as a super-ordinate and standard variety. Whereas, dialect, on the other hand, is often seen as a lower, subordinate and non-standard variety.
The term Language is used to refer to an abstract system
underlying the behaviour in speech, writing, and signing of an entire community or society. In other words we can say that language is regarded as a system of speaking, writing, and signing common to a group of people (Mesthrie: 2001). The term dialect has generally been used to refer to a subordinate variety of a language. When there are systematic differences in the way different groups speak a language, we can say that each group speaks a dialect of that language (Fromkin: 2011).
A dialect is not an inferior or degraded form of a language,
and logically could not be so since a language is a collection of dialects (Fromkin: 2011). Bell’s Criteria on the Distinction between Language and Dialect Due to this difficulty we may have to distinguish a language from a dialect, Bell (1976) has listed seven criteria that may be useful in discussing different kinds of languages.
Standardisation – is a process by which a language has been
codified in some way. That process usually involves the development of grammars, spelling books, dictionaries and possible literature.
Vitality – refers to the existence of a living community of
speakers. This criterion can be used to distinguish languages that are ‘alive’ from those that are ‘dead’. Historicity – refers to the fact that a particular group of people finds a sense of identity through using a particular language. Social, political, religious or ethnic ties may also be important for the group, but the bond provided by a common language may prove to be the strongest tie of all.
Autonomy – this criterion suggests that a language must be
felt by its speakers to be different from other languages.
Reduction – refers to the fact that a particular variety may be
regarded as a sub-variety rather than as an independent entity. Mixture – refers to feelings speakers have about the ‘purity’ of the variety they speak. This criterion partly explains why speakers of pidgins and creoles have difficulty in classifying what they speak as full languages.
De facto norms – refers to the feeling that many speakers
have that there are both ‘good’ speakers and ‘poor’ speakers and that the good speakers represent the norms of proper usage (Wardaugh: 2006). Regional Dialects and Social Dialects
Dialectal diversity develops when people are separated
geographically and socially. The changes that occur in the language spoken in one area or group do not necessarily spread to another (Fromkin: 2011).
A change that occurs in one region and fails to spread to other
regions of the language community gives rise to dialect differences. When enough such differences accumulate in a particular region, the language spoken has its own character, and that version of a language is referred to as a regional dialect (Fromkin: 2011). Regional variation in the way a language is spoken is likely to provide one of the easiest ways of observing variety in language (Wardaugh: 2011).
Whereas regional dialects are geographically based, social
dialects originate among social groups and are related to a variety of factors, the main ones apparently being social class, religion, and ethnicity.